Results 1 to 24 of 24

Thread: Ethical to hire only Deltas in my company?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Ethical to hire only Deltas in my company?

    Hi guys.

    My first post here!


    Anyway.

    I'm EII and plan to start my own company at some point in the future.

    I have a few questions that I would appreciate some input on.



    Do you guys think it would be unethical for me to insist on only hiring other Deltas?

    I my previous job, it was a mix of primarily Gamma and Delta, and I found that virtually all of the toxic office politics originated from the Gammas engaging in destructive power struggles, making everyone's lives miserable in the process.

    By contrast, in my current workplace it just so happens that everyone is Delta, and the work environment has been absolutely sublime in its total lack of conflict. Everyone literally gets along perfectly, and it genuinely feels like one big happy family.

    Naturally, when I start my own company, I want that same kind of harmony and peace. I see office politics and power struggles as a total waste of time and productivity.

    However, in conversations with HR people in the past, I've heard them say that it's unethical to hire people based on their MBTI types. This makes me wonder if the same principle would apply to Socionics?

    Or could it be argued that it's unethical to hire people if I already know they will be incompatible and likely to clash with each other? Can it be reasonably said that I have a "moral obligation" to hire only people of compatible Socionic types?

    What do you guys think?

  2. #2
    What's the purpose of SEI? Tallmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Finland
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    2,501
    Mentioned
    177 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hawkeye View Post
    Hi guys.

    However, in conversations with HR people in the past, I've heard them say that it's unethical to hire people based on their MBTI types. This makes me wonder if the same principle would apply to Socionics?

    What do you guys think?
    HR people have their own guidelines and they are no experts on typology. If you have your own company you decide yourself. Besides, it would be a mistake to hire based on MBTI. Socionics is different though.

    Why are you even asking this? Of course you put together the team you want to work with if you have a chance to do so.
    A true sense-perception certainly exists, but it always looks as though objects were not so much forcing their way into the subject in their own right as that the subject were seeing things quite differently, or saw quite other things than the rest of mankind. As a matter of fact, the subject perceives the same things as everybody else, only, he never stops at the purely objective effect, but concerns himself with the subjective perception released by the objective stimulus.
    (Jung on Si)


    My Pinterest

  3. #3
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    7,950
    Mentioned
    887 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hawkeye View Post
    Hi guys.

    My first post here!


    Anyway.

    I'm EII and plan to start my own company at some point in the future.

    I have a few questions that I would appreciate some input on.



    Do you guys think it would be unethical for me to insist on only hiring other Deltas?

    I my previous job, it was a mix of primarily Gamma and Delta, and I found that virtually all of the toxic office politics originated from the Gammas engaging in destructive power struggles, making everyone's lives miserable in the process.

    By contrast, in my current workplace it just so happens that everyone is Delta, and the work environment has been absolutely sublime in its total lack of conflict. Everyone literally gets along perfectly, and it genuinely feels like one big happy family.

    Naturally, when I start my own company, I want that same kind of harmony and peace. I see office politics and power struggles as a total waste of time and productivity.

    However, in conversations with HR people in the past, I've heard them say that it's unethical to hire people based on their MBTI types. This makes me wonder if the same principle would apply to Socionics?

    Or could it be argued that it's unethical to hire people if I already know they will be incompatible and likely to clash with each other? Can it be reasonably said that I have a "moral obligation" to hire only people of compatible Socionic types?

    What do you guys think?
    @Hawkeye, I've thought about this a lot. A lot. I've been experimenting for years, as a matter of fact.

    Yes, it is unethical to hire based on MBTI or on Socionics or race or color or creed or anything else, other than the ability to do the job.

    On the other hand, I was in a factory near Detroit and there were no blacks working there. When I asked the foreman about that, he said "We don't hire ******s here." The place went out of business a few years later from lack of talent.

    So hiring the best, regardless of what they look like or what they do in their spare time, is going to be your most essential strategy. If you only hire your friends or the people that you like, you will find yourself engaged in an emotionally difficult and very expensive waste of as much time as you keep that clusterfuck going.

    Human talent is your only advantage. Don't start building your house on a foundation of stuff you brought home from the city dump because you liked it. Hire the best. And if you don't believe that the best arise from all groups, then you are already at a disadvantage to your competitors.

    OK, having said that, you should start your hires with people who can help you the most with the least amount of input from you. The whole idea of hiring someone is to offload the work that you are doing onto someone who is better at it than you, so you can concentrate on 1. Making your vision a reality, and 2. The things that you do best.
    That means, most likely, hiring Duals, Identicals, and Mirrors. People from your Quadra. You don't need to justify your choices in most states when the number of employees is small. Also, look for quality minorities. They are often just waiting for a chance to prove themselves, which is much better than hiring some entitled asshole who thinks that he or she invented language so they are done working for the day.

    Once you have a few people on board who share your vision and who think the same way you do, you will (should) find that they lack talent in certain areas that you need talent in. If you are Delta, those areas are Ti and Fe, but what you will practically find is that you can't get any Deltas to do a job very well that is essential to your business. You are going to have to hire Alphas or Gammas. You might even have to hire some Betas. Your ability to manage this successfully will say a lot about who you are as a person.

    You might even discover why most businesses fail in the first two years.

    But hopefully not. Best of luck to you.

  4. #4
    Jesus is the cruel sausage consentingadult's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,496
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It is not uncommon for groups cultures to organically develop into a specific quadra culture, by people unconsciously selecting other people from their own quadra. So ethically th ere is no objection, imho.

    One should, however, keep in the back of ones mind that Deltas are not suitable for every kind of job. Especially in sales it pays not to place your bets on one specific quadra. Also, not all Deltas are mentally healthy people and as such can screw up your business or team spirit.

    Last but not least. in this day and age there can be some overlap between quadra values and subcutural values. Over here in the Netherlands, if you only hire Deltas, you probably won't be catching a lot of people with color of skin. You figure out the consequences of that.
    “I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    11,790
    Mentioned
    1079 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    it's doubtful you'll can type good enough to be sure anyone has types you think

    if you want "nice" people - choose which you perceive so
    if you want good in something else - the same

    there are no objectively good typing methods and typers. a half can be typed incorrectly and you may understand this after a time. you may also reject deltas due to mistypings

    Where good friendship is not supposed to be main requirement, types are lesser useful.
    Besides you may reject people good enough and even better, but having lesser "nice" Jung type. Also, to be "nice" Jung type is one of factors.

    In sum. To use more common approaches is more reasonable in your situation.

    -

    If you very want people of some types. At 1st it's good to make or find an IRL communication group and watch people there for some time to identify their types. To type correctly people which you don't know good needs higher skills. Such group may to be for people having interests in a region where you want to cooperate. Also you may communicate individually. This may reduce the quantity of mistakes from >40% to mb <30% - they may stay in significant quantity. Think, is it acceptable %.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  6. #6
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    3,887
    Mentioned
    269 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    it's a bad move to mix "friends" and work

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Under your bed
    TIM
    LSI
    Posts
    925
    Mentioned
    50 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i don't think it's unethical

    i think on the surface, don't even mention it to avoid legal issues

    but if you're the owner, you gotta do you and what's best for your company

  8. #8

    Default

    No awareness for logic of dynamics.

  9. #9

    Default

    Post also smells like someone, who needs to have their scapegoats ready for day x.



  10. #10
    shotgunfingers's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    the rice fields
    TIM
    ILE-Ti
    Posts
    446
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hawkeye View Post
    What do you guys think?

  11. #11
    xerxe xerxe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ministry of Love
    Posts
    6,395
    Mentioned
    104 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    One company I've worked for uses Myers Briggs to make hiring decisions. I think it's ridiculous.

    Personality theory isn't exactly empirical science, and my advice is to not rely on it for major decisions. Just go with your gut. Unless you have an actual Socionics test on hand, none of which are reliable to begin with, your method of typing people is already going to rely on guess-work and intuition.
    Last edited by xerxe; 06-29-2020 at 08:52 PM.

  12. #12
    COOF Grendel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    TIM
    bad (the bad kind)
    Posts
    1,709
    Mentioned
    126 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There's nothing ethical about narrowing the outrageous standards of employability even further than they already are. It's impossible enough to land anything these days as it is. These suits trying to psychotype people from a distance with formulas to determine who they want to use and who they don't deserve to be shot. If you can be as audacious as to claim things like healthcare are somehow human rights, you must believe work is a fundamental human right as well.

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Under your bed
    TIM
    LSI
    Posts
    925
    Mentioned
    50 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Mike Krzyzewski, Dukes basketball Coach (probably one of the most successful) recruits only the best of the best players on Duke's basketball team.

    Would this coach be unethical because he's not allowing subpar players in?

    If deltas are (what u discern) to be the best of the best for your squad.... and they have the credentials/passed the interview process (+ demonstrating those qualities)...

    Why not?

    Factor in (while not automatically eliminating other types) being a delta as part of the decision making process... for your company and its values

    Equal oppportunity without forcing the outcome

    When you force the outcome (without emphasizing the best of the best) you get this:

    Last edited by onfireee; 06-29-2020 at 06:15 PM.

  14. #14
    COOF Grendel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    TIM
    bad (the bad kind)
    Posts
    1,709
    Mentioned
    126 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by onfireee View Post
    When you force the outcome (without emphasizing the best of the best) you get this:

    All-[demographic] casts like this aren't the result of settling with what you can find and getting first-come first-serve. In fact, they're the more calculated recruitment: getting only people with a certain trait, rather than taking what you get. Yes, within certain limits of basic qualification, mediocre-jobs should be recruiting on a first-come first-serve basis. You can't just dump all the mediocre into the furnace like this.

    You cannot have a working society where only the top 50% most competent are even qualified to subsist for themselves. Not every company is a major-league sports team, niches like janitors and trashmen exist as well. Corporate culture has never been notorious for taking social responsibility "too far," only for their egregious entitlement to the highest efficiency at the cost of human well-being. This craze needs to stop, it's killing us.

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Under your bed
    TIM
    LSI
    Posts
    925
    Mentioned
    50 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
    You can't just dump all the mediocre into the furnace like this.
    I never said that. It depends on the owner and their values

    If u want to win in basketball get people that are good at basketball.

    If u want a nice cozy environment where everyone holds hands and gets along perfectly + not concerned with max performance... then fine, hire whom-ever, if those are your company values

    You cannot have a working society where only the top 50% most competent are even qualified to subsist for themselves. Not every company is a major-league sports team, niches like janitors and trashmen exist as well. Corporate culture has never been notorious for taking social responsibility "too far," only for their egregious entitlement to the highest efficiency at the cost of human well-being.
    Same response as above

    Quote Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
    This craze needs to stop, it's killing us.
    The equality craze and the obsession with not being racist is actually killing us

  16. #16

    Default

    It's not a question of ethics. Just because a person is Delta does not mean he will be right for the job or have the right skill set. And having a team of all Deltas will most likely emphasize certain blindspots. Do those blindspots overshadow the pros? A successful company is about finding people who can help cover your blindspots and optimize the company.

    It comes down to the questions: What are the needs of the company and who would be the best fit? Personality type can only tell you so much.
    Last edited by JustWandering; 06-29-2020 at 08:53 PM.
    “There are things known and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors of perception.”
    Aldous Huxley

  17. #17
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    25,174
    Mentioned
    624 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yes deltas work so well together except LSE with IEE- that’s more like war
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
    Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  18. #18
    Jesus is the cruel sausage consentingadult's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,496
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JustWandering View Post
    It's not a question of ethics. Just because a person is Delta does not mean he will be right for the job or have the right skill set. And having a team of all Deltas will most likely emphasize certain blindspots. Do those blindspots overshadow the pros? A successful company is about finding people who can help cover your blindspots and optimize the company..
    Sheer nonsense. Many especially smaller businesses over time develop into quadra-centric organizations through a process of 'natural selection'. Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Delta teams, and all these teams work fine. I have seen teams fall apart because someone left and was replaced by someone who didn't fit quadra wise. I mean, how difficult is it to figure out that replacing an LSE manager in a Delta team by an SLE is a recipe for disaster? I have seen it happen productivity dropping by 50% because Deltas didn't want to go beyond the call of duty anymore because of the management style of an SLE, which in itself was not really a bad style, but not suitable to lead a Delta team.
    “I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking

  19. #19

    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tallmo View Post
    HR people have their own guidelines and they are no experts on typology.
    Ain't that the goddam truth lol.


    Besides, it would be a mistake to hire based on MBTI.
    Yes, in my experience MBTI is pretty useless on a practical level. I would never hire anyone on this basis.

    Of course you put together the team you want to work with if you have a chance to do so.
    True. I guess I'm trying to figure out how overt or covert I need to be about the fact that I'm including Socionics as a factor in my hiring process, considering how easily triggered people are these days, and how easy it's become for careers to end because of one small error in judgment.

  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by consentingadult View Post
    Sheer nonsense. Many especially smaller businesses over time develop into quadra-centric organizations through a process of 'natural selection'. Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Delta teams, and all these teams work fine. I have seen teams fall apart because someone left and was replaced by someone who didn't fit quadra wise. I mean, how difficult is it to figure out that replacing an LSE manager in a Delta team by an SLE is a recipe for disaster? I have seen it happen productivity dropping by 50% because Deltas didn't want to go beyond the call of duty anymore because of the management style of an SLE, which in itself was not really a bad style, but not suitable to lead a Delta team.
    Ok. Experiences will vary. My small business would sink to the ground if it was all Beta because there would be too much of an echo chamber and the vision would get too lofty. It really depends on the needs of the particular company.

    To your point, having a manager who doesn't align with the company culture would of course create friction, but sometimes having people who share similar values but from a different vantage point can be invaluable (that can't always be explained by socionics, sorry).
    “There are things known and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors of perception.”
    Aldous Huxley

  21. #21
    Jesus is the cruel sausage consentingadult's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,496
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JustWandering View Post
    Ok. Experiences will vary. My small business would sink to the ground if it was all Beta because there would be too much of an echo chamber.and the vision would get too lofty. It really depends on the needs of the particular company.

    To your point, having a manager who doesn't align with the company would of course create friction, but sometimes having people who share similar values but from a different vantage point can be invaluable (that can't always be explained by socionics, sorry).
    I look at it from a perspective of a cultural anthropologist, and that's what I see all the time. Now there are situations where people from different quadras can intermingle, e.g. you might see teams of mostly ST people in workshops. Such teams can coexist quite well, especially if people in such teams are allowed to work a lot just by themselves. Now the question is: what happens over time with such teams when people leave and have to be replaced? Now if team leader is the one who is hiring the new employee, you will see that over time the team will grow into something that centers heavily around one quadra. If the hiring is done by someone outside the team e.g. an HR Manager, than chances are more likely that the team stays diverse. Obviously, it is not always a good thing for a team to center on one quadra. Often it can go good for a while, until circumstances change and the team hasn't got the ability to adapt to the new conditions.
    “I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking

  22. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by consentingadult View Post
    I look at it from a perspective of a cultural anthropologist, and that's what I see all the time. Now there are situations where people from different quadras can intermingle, e.g. you might see teams of mostly ST people in workshops. Such teams can coexist quite well, especially if people in such teams are allowed to work a lot just by themselves. Now the question is: what happens over time with such teams when people leave and have to be replaced? Now if team leader is the one who is hiring the new employee, you will see that over time the team will grow into something that centers heavily around one quadra. If the hiring is done by someone outside the team e.g. an HR Manager, than chances are more likely that the team stays diverse. Obviously, it is not always a good thing for a team to center on one quadra. Often it can go good for a while, until circumstances change and the team hasn't got the ability to adapt to the new conditions.
    The bold was what I was trying to get at. It's prudent for the OP to pay attention to the evolving needs of the company more than hiring based on quadra. However, if having only Deltas fits the bill, then all the power to the OP.
    “There are things known and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors of perception.”
    Aldous Huxley

  23. #23
    thework.com Kalinoche the Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    currently belgium
    TIM
    Fe Esfj
    Posts
    3,410
    Mentioned
    205 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    it is your company. You could start by hiring only deltas and see how that works out. you may even attract attention by telling the press that this is what you do. will be quirky. Actually maybe it's better to keep this under your hat. dunno. Also, it might be helpful to think that you are not doing this because it is ethical/not ethical/right/not right but because you are curious. Plus, a small company size may be more forgiving of this kind of experimentation.
    Last edited by Kalinoche the Child; 06-30-2020 at 12:30 PM.
    honest labor needs no master

    Nothing good is a miracle, nothing lovely is a dream.

    Επί πάντων μέμνησο τα έσχατά σου, και ου μη αμαρτήσης

  24. #24
    Jesus is the cruel sausage consentingadult's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,496
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    One a side note, here is a scene from the movie 'Capitalism: A Love Story'. It runs from about 58:20 till 1:01:38. In this scene Michael Moore makes a case for what he sees as 'democratically led and worker-owned companies', which he sees as a fair alternative to the typical capitalist way of organizing businesses.

    https://youtu.be/yLDIoO_ug2c?t=3500

    My question is: what do we see when we look at the faces of these workers, especially in the first example? And what can we conclude from that, what is it Michael Moore fails to see? Try to look at this situation from a Socionics perspective, like a sociologist or a cultural anthropologist, not from the POV of a single individual who projects his own personal experiences onto a larger whole. And also not from a political or political science perspective.
    Last edited by consentingadult; 06-30-2020 at 11:18 AM.
    “I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •