I wouldn’t rule out IEI and I wouldn’t look at stereotypes but ask myself what it is that I supply a relationship and societyOriginally Posted by jumpintoillusions
I wouldn’t rule out IEI and I wouldn’t look at stereotypes but ask myself what it is that I supply a relationship and society
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I don’t get an IEI vibe. And I’ve typed a lot on here IEI lol.
When finding ones type a good homework to do is to watch an enormous amount of videos of all types. That's what I did. Preferably people who are typed correctly. Self knowledge is not enough since the Socionics/Jung type focuses on some specific typical traits, not the whole personality.
Here is a SEI for you to observe, typed by myself irl. She is one of the most outgoing SEIs I've met, I am much less outgoing myself. And here is an EII. (video starts 1:34:40). She is also of the more outgoing kind. Hope it helps a little on the journey.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Have you watched my video or videos of INFJ and INFP together?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Don’t pay attention to how they describe each other’s functions
INFP is IEI
INFJ is EII
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-dd8mt_hNAU&t=70s
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
