View Poll Results: Initial Feedback On Type?

Voters
3. You may not vote on this poll
  • EII Fi-Ne

    2 66.67%
  • SEI Si-Fe

    1 33.33%
  • Something else

    0 0%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 45 of 45

Thread: SEI or EII?

  1. #41
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    25,174
    Mentioned
    624 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jumpintoillusions View Post
    I've been part of World Socionics Society and they were the two types that people seen for me, or IEE and IEI. I joined a Beta focused group who said they couldn't see me as being IEI. I guess I shouldn't be so hasty to discount IEE. It's just throughout my typing journey so far I've been told by some adamantly that I'm SEI and by others that I'm EII. When people's seen visual of me in video hangouts they've commented that I seem very SEI but focus a lot on Fi. However I don't really see myself as being a Si ego or a Fe creative because I feel like I don't really fit in big groups. Plus, in MBTI when initially coming to typology I typed as INFP, and that's what I'm attached to. Even though MBTI is different to Socionics, I still hold that worldview that I can't be a sensor. It's my faulty reasoning to content with in any case. I know no one has the authority over me,yet it's also on me who should know myself better and understand.

    I have watched videos of typed SEIS and EIIS and I see more similarity in visual cues with SEIs. I had one comment once on a video of mine that I was too animated (despite being shy) to be a Fi ego.

    I'm sorry for the confusion everyone. I hate not knowing and I guess it makes me come across as a stupid, crazy weirdo..
    I wouldn’t rule out IEI and I wouldn’t look at stereotypes but ask myself what it is that I supply a relationship and society
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
    Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  2. #42
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    3,609
    Mentioned
    257 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don’t get an IEI vibe. And I’ve typed a lot on here IEI lol.

  3. #43
    What's the purpose of SEI? Tallmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Finland
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    2,499
    Mentioned
    177 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jumpintoillusions View Post

    I have watched videos of typed SEIS and EIIS and I see more similarity in visual cues with SEIs. I had one comment once on a video of mine that I was too animated (despite being shy) to be a Fi ego.
    When finding ones type a good homework to do is to watch an enormous amount of videos of all types. That's what I did. Preferably people who are typed correctly. Self knowledge is not enough since the Socionics/Jung type focuses on some specific typical traits, not the whole personality.

    Here is a SEI for you to observe, typed by myself irl. She is one of the most outgoing SEIs I've met, I am much less outgoing myself. And here is an EII. (video starts 1:34:40). She is also of the more outgoing kind. Hope it helps a little on the journey.
    A true sense-perception certainly exists, but it always looks as though objects were not so much forcing their way into the subject in their own right as that the subject were seeing things quite differently, or saw quite other things than the rest of mankind. As a matter of fact, the subject perceives the same things as everybody else, only, he never stops at the purely objective effect, but concerns himself with the subjective perception released by the objective stimulus.
    (Jung on Si)


    My Pinterest

  4. #44
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    25,174
    Mentioned
    624 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jumpintoillusions View Post
    I've been part of World Socionics Society and they were the two types that people seen for me, or IEE and IEI. I joined a Beta focused group who said they couldn't see me as being IEI. I guess I shouldn't be so hasty to discount IEE. It's just throughout my typing journey so far I've been told by some adamantly that I'm SEI and by others that I'm EII. When people's seen visual of me in video hangouts they've commented that I seem very SEI but focus a lot on Fi. However I don't really see myself as being a Si ego or a Fe creative because I feel like I don't really fit in big groups. Plus, in MBTI when initially coming to typology I typed as INFP, and that's what I'm attached to. Even though MBTI is different to Socionics, I still hold that worldview that I can't be a sensor. It's my faulty reasoning to content with in any case. I know no one has the authority over me,yet it's also on me who should know myself better and understand.

    I have watched videos of typed SEIS and EIIS and I see more similarity in visual cues with SEIs. I had one comment once on a video of mine that I was too animated (despite being shy) to be a Fi ego.

    I'm sorry for the confusion everyone. I hate not knowing and I guess it makes me come across as a stupid, crazy weirdo..
    Have you watched my video or videos of INFJ and INFP together?
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
    Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  5. #45
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    25,174
    Mentioned
    624 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Don’t pay attention to how they describe each other’s functions
    INFP is IEI
    INFJ is EII

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-dd8mt_hNAU&t=70s
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
    Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •