-
Capture1 sunsh1ne.PNGCapture2 sunsh1ne.PNG
Hey! I am interested in your research. Always wondered what Sociotypes had got to do with the Vedic Nakshatras and didn't really find anyone finding the correlation between them on the internet other than your post here. You can add this to your list, mine has always fluctuated between INFP and INFJ however recent test typed me an LII-INTj. Personally though I have been going through changes in perspective and am confused and lost while making decisions but want to know myself better. Would be great to know what you think of this!![]()
I know that there is no correlation between astrology and Socionics type, but here are my guesses about which stereotypical zodiac sign matches each Socionics type.
Alpha Quadra:
ILE: Aquarius or Gemini
LII: Aquarius
ESE: Libra
SEI: Taurus or Libra
Beta Quadra:
SLE: Aries
LSI: Virgo or Capricorn
EIE: Leo
IEI: Pisces
Gamma Quadra:
LIE: Capricorn
ILI: Scorpio
SEE: Leo
ESI: Virgo or Cancer
Delta Quadra:
LSE: Capricorn or Virgo
SLI: Taurus
IEE: Sagittarius or Gemini
EII: Cancer
Attachment 16801
Attachment 16802
SEI. Enneagram 2 or 6 idk.
I can't believe I just discovered this.
What is the goal of this post though? Say our nakshatra and what our type is?
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
Nakshatras are 27 subdivisions of the Vedic astrological chart. While Indian astrologers don't use the western zodiac wheel, it has been used in conjunction with it in modern times.
Its a long story but the link below should help provide a better answer.
https://www.ganeshaspeaks.com/astrology/nakshatras-constellations/
Astrosage is a good site to find out what your birth chart is in the vedic system.
https://www.astrosage.com/
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
IMO if you want to get started on astrology I wouldn't start with Indian astrology since its very complicated and a little different from western astrology.
A good astrology reference site to look at is astro.com they have a lot of free information and you can create your birth chart on there for free.
https://www.astro.com/horoscope
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
Here are mine:
Alpha Quadra:
ILE: Aquarius (Ne sub) or Aries (Ti sub)
LII: Gemini (Ne sub) or Virgo (Ti sub)
ESE: Libra (Fe sub) or Taurus (Si sub)
SEI: Leo (Si sub) or Aries (Fe sub)
Beta Quadra:
SLE: Capricorn (Ti sub) or Leo (Se sub)
LSI: Capricorn (Ti sub) or Libra (Se sub)
EIE: Taurus (Fe) or Cancer (Ni)
IEI: Aquarius (Ni) or Aries (Fe)
Gamma Quadra:
LIE: Capricorn (Te) or Libra (Ni)
ILI: Pisces (Ni) or Leo (Te)
SEE: Gemini (Se) or Scorpio (Fi)
ESI: Taurus (Fi) or Cancer (Se)
Delta Quadra:
LSE: Sagittarius (Si) or Pisces (Te)
SLI: Gemini (Si) or Scorpio (Te)
IEE: Leo (Fi) or Pisces (Ne)
EII: Libra (Fi) or Taurus (Ne)
----------------------------
On the topic: I suspect each nakshatra carries the energy of a particular type. Say, Rohini for example, could carry SEE-Se energy.
Did you know that there's a tunnel under Ocean Bvd?Personal Website: https://sites.google.com/view/the-qams-diaries/the-qams-diaries
Try to guess my sign dear astrology experts![]()
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
Pisces Sun/Pisces Moon/ Virgo Rising
&
Satabhisha Nakshatra
[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8)]Inhabiting the realm of Aquarius, Satabhisha nakshatra, ruled by the planetary power of Saturn and divine power of Varuna; symbolizes spiritual and physical healing. The lunar node of ‘Rahu’ also has its influence on Satabhisha nakshatra.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8)]
Nakshatra Malayalam Tamil Telugu Hindi Shatabhisha ചതയം (Chatayam) சதயம் (Satayam) శతభిష (Satabhisa) शतभिषक् (Shathabhishak)
[/COLOR]
Basic information about Satabhisha Birth Star
[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8)]Also known as the ‘veiling star’; Satabhisha nakshatra involves the general characteristics of mysticism, spirituality, secretive vision apart from healing. The star symbol of ‘empty circle’; representing this nakshatra pertains to the realm of illusory perception or ‘maya’. Attraction for the cosmic reality and a mysterious inclination towards concealment are the other general characteristics of Satabhisha nakshatra. Etymologically connoting the concept of medication or ‘bhesaja’; Satabhisha nakshatra influences varying forms of aquatic life.[/COLOR]
Yeah, I suppose it's time to get the thread back on topic lol.
My Sun and Ascendant signs are in Bharani.
My Moon is in the Shravana Nakshatra.
I have Rahu in Vishakha and Ketu in Krittika.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
My rising sign changes between Vedic and regular astrology. I will pick whichever one suits me better and/or makes me feel more special lol:
- Scorpio sun
- Aquarius rising
- Taurus moon
or
- Scorpio sun
- Capricorn rising
- Taurus moon
All my signs change in Vedic astrology.
In Western:
Pisces sun
Libra moon
Virgo rising
In Vedic:
Aquarius sun
Virgo moon
Leo rising
I usually stick with western since it just seems easier to me and I fit Pisces sun, Libra moon so much. I also have my moon in the 1st in Western astrology which would totally change in Vedic. Also Vedic seems to be a lot harder to understand and get used to.
Side note: When I first looked into socionics I was like "the way how IEIs are described is such a stereotypical Pisces". And I would say Pisces and Libra are the two types that correlate with SEI to me.
Chronic "grass is always greener" syndrome