This test has 306 questions! I don't think if you answered 50 questions wrong you will still have an accurate result, just answer as honest as you can, if you have that patience lol.
This test has 306 questions! I don't think if you answered 50 questions wrong you will still have an accurate result, just answer as honest as you can, if you have that patience lol.
I have done it to know my subtype. The problem is I just wanted to know if I am sp/sx or sx/sp 2, and I got sp (got 7 answers) and sx (got 7 answers) so (got -1), I don't know what the hell is this, is this a curse, just done 306 questions test and still didn't know my instinctual variants lol. I believe it's a curse.
Is it accurate?
With wing 7 lol
Quite accurate for me... I managed to get -33 so...
Did you keep a screenshot?
LoL WTF, no I didn't.
Last edited by Farag; 02-21-2020 at 08:28 PM.
Checkout this test COOL!
Ah yeah, I've taken that one, it's accurate enough, but I'm not sure if it's qualified to do tritype and that sort of thing... it's still just a test.
socionics.jpg
I got 5w4 sx/sp. I think the type 6 (my actual type) questions were super dumb.
interesting....🤔
@aster, I thought the same thing. Most EII’s are e4w5 or e9w1. Almost none are e1.
My guess is that all that reading you’ve been doing about that ESE/LSE couple who disappeared their kids and previous spouses and left a trail of bodies has made you hyper-alert to imperfect behavior.
This one worked for me
Screenshot_2023-01-21-00-15-52-25_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg
@Miss Messy , I recommend.
Then, the angel asked her what her name was. She said: "I have none"
This is a massive test which I will do later
https://sakinorva.net/test/rowe
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
That took forever. Here are my results:
Most likely Enneagram type: 4
(with wing): 4w5
possible instinctual variant stacking: sx/sp/so
4: 19
9: 15
5: 13
1: 12
2: 12
6: 6
3: 3
7: -3
8: -16
Type me here: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...nnaire-(Nunki)
I took it and it gave me my type. But that isn't saying much since, you know, it relies on self reported data. I think the wings and the instincts were a little off but not bad. I don't pay too much attention to those things since they are more likely to vary.
Pretty accurate test! My results were 9w1 sx/sp/so.
Second highest result was sexual 2; lowest result was social 5.
The problem with this test is that it calculate instinctual variant stacking in a poor way
It collects what the person got in the instinct of each Enneagram, then arranges them from the higher number to the lower number
For example this result:
If you looked at " possible instinctual variant " section you'll find that it's supposed to be So/Sx
But if you looked at E4 section in the table bellow, you'll find that the result was 5 points for 4 Sp , 3 points for Sx and So
But the test gave So/Sx because it collected all the numbers in the field of Sp, Sx, and So , and found that the number of So is the biggest (12 points ) , followed by Sx ( 13 points ), then Sp ( 9 points )
Except for this problem, it's good
Another problem with it: it relies on descriptions that are less accurate than some descriptions