And she does it again. The way you keep insulting me means I hit your PoLR -- you're reacting emotionally, from a vulnerable place, like an Fi PoLR.Originally Posted by sbbds
I do think ESI is a good typing for me though, so thank you, indirectly.
And she does it again. The way you keep insulting me means I hit your PoLR -- you're reacting emotionally, from a vulnerable place, like an Fi PoLR.
I do think ESI is a good typing for me though, so thank you, indirectly.
You realize also that I was making points while insulting you, because of your shitty attitude?
Of course there’s some emotion in all insults but if you think that was emotionally vulnerable then idk lol, it doesn’t make sense to see yourself as Fi leading is all that I can say.
You only made points so you could insult me without having your comments removed. Also, you are the only one that thinks I have a shitty attitude. The others have been perfectly pleasant to interact with. Yet more evidence that I'm supervising your ass.
That’s not a good excuse for not addressing my points, but nice try.
I don't need any excuse except that you insulted me and didn't make valid points in the first place.
Also, I'm not an IEI. You disgust me in every possible way, I think you are a filthy woman, so you are not my dual anyway. In my language, we have a word for you, but I have a feeling that the translation of that word will get me banned from this forum.
If you really think this then it’s perfect evidence for your Te polr. I’m about to make one more.
You're confusing Te suggestive with Te PoLR.
You responded before my edit, but I'm not an IEI. You disgust me in every possible way, I think you are a filthy woman, so you are not my dual anyway. In my language, we have a word for you, but I have a feeling that the translation of that word will get me banned from this forum.
"I’m about to make one more" - and it will fall on deaf ears, because I'm not responsive to your Se or Ti, which I would be, if I was an IEI.
Your ass is still getting supervised.
Do you really think an ESI, or SEI for that matter with fucking 4D Si would bitch about something like this?
As for “Te seeking” at the end, we seek strong forms of our weaker unvalued IEs to a degree too. Desiring pragmatism alone is not evidence for Te seeking. Just like desiring love and intimacy would not be evidence for Fi seeking over Fi polr.
If they had the vision problems I've had since birth, yes.
Your second point contradicts the basic socionics tenet of dual seeking. So, this is (not surprisingly) another invalid point from your invalid, worthless Ti.
Anyway, since you are disgusting and filthy, this will be my last post to you. I'm not interested in catching the diseases that women like you carry around.
But can you prove it?
I didn’t expect the typical Te polr to be able to.
Edit: You will find in time that my understanding is the canonical one on here. It may not be stated explicitly in articles, but it’s directly implied with dynamics like supervision and dimensionality theory. Any amount of basic experience with correctly typed individuals will let you see that as well.
Last edited by sbbds; 03-19-2020 at 03:06 AM.
My point with this still stands too, because a 4D Si type would be more likely to ensure they have those problems dealt with in order to have them not become a daily nuisance, especially for normal activities like reading regular text on screen. It’s one more data point of evidence against 4D Si.
In any case, you have yet to give any evidence that you have more than 2D Si.
Incel spotted
I'm also a woman lol, I'm not an incel. The difference is that I'm a real woman, who keeps my legs together and my heart with Christ, not a... word that would get me banned.
Women can still be incels, dumbass.
I see why you relate to stereotypical ESI descriptions.
Not my dual.
Actually, I don't use type descriptions for typing and I've never read an ESI description.
Right, then you're just a fucking idiot. Got it.
Typing based on IEs instead of superficial descriptions is the correct way to do it. If you type based on superficial descriptions, then I see why you think you are a LIE. The descriptions tell you what you want to hear, and you eat it up.
Good to know. In that case, I will identify as an incel going forward. Unfortunately, male incels don't agree with you though. Are you aware of any support groups for female incels?
You are not my dual either. You are not a LIE. And the SLE whore is not my dual either.
You grossly misunderstood me LOL. I agree that typing based on IEs is the best way to do it.
I was suggesting that I don't see how you would type as ESI if you were typing by IEs, as you don't seem to fit ESI on anything more than a superficial level. I mean, SEI perhaps, but not ESI.
And for that matter, I'd rather be an Se lead if I could be any type, lol.
Strong Te polr. Not Te seeking. Case closed.
"Support groups"
Very Fi there.
lol You barely know your own type and yet somehow you think you're qualified enough to type ME? FOH. Whatever you are, it's boring af and I don't like it. Could barely get through your mundane, pedestrian ass questionnaire without my eyes glossing over. Immediate impression was that you were some kind of autistic SLI, but upon closer inspection, don't know if logic is your strong suit. Maybe you're a particularly basic and uninteresting SEI.
Alonzo is most certainly an LIE, get a fucking grip lol. Focus on your own type.
SEI is what I considered originally but I was told that I was too aggressive for that. I'm very traditional so I would love to be an SEI. Thank you. You've paid me a huge compliment.lol You barely know your own type and yet somehow you think you're qualified enough to type ME? FOH. Whatever you are, it's boring af and I don't like it. Could barely get through your mundane, pedestrian ass questionnaire without my eyes glossing over. Immediate impression was that you were some kind of autistic SLI, but upon closer inspection, don't know if logic is your strong suit. Maybe you're a particularly basic and uninteresting SEI.
I value Se much more so than Si, so SEI doesn't make sense because of that. Other than that, yes. I wish I could be SEI. I'm very traditional, so SEI is basically my ideal of a woman.
My own type is decided now.
You value Se? Bitch where?
Throughout this entire thread. It's all combativeness, pushing, aggressiveness, force. If I were an Si valuing type, I would have defused these conflicts and backed out long ago.
I mean not exactly, you haven't really provided any convincing arguments of ESI. Instead what you've done is directed insults at everybody elses type and sexuality to passive aggressively change the subject because you can't handle the spotlight being on you. Doesn't really say Se ego to me lol.My own type is decided now.
I don't see why I have to provide convincing arguments to others. I'm convinced, I have decided now. And throughout this thread, the spotlight has been on me, and I have been regularly insulted. So, your assessment is simply inaccurate.
Because when you call others whores and filthy and suggest other people are mistyped on your own thread, you need to back it up with actual substance.
Oh, I see your confusion. You think that I have to Te on my own. I don't. That's your job.
So you're allowed to sling shit around without anything to back it up because your Te is shit? I didn't think ESIs were the type to form bs excuses such as that, but pop off sis.
It's your job to back up my values with facts. Get on it.
Not quite how that works, because that's assuming I agree with your "values" (which I do not - as you can tell).
I thought you were going to be some incompetent yet hot twink IEI guy who I could give one of my multiple STI and other viruses to. I’m sadly disappointed.
It's still your job to give the viruses, you disgusting filthy whore. Lol.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote