Thanks, I don't mind still discussing btw.
re SLE-Ti: I forgot I'd mentioned the previous SLE typing; I understand now why you didn't mention it.
Yes, I did think it was notable what you pointed out earlier:
"Also, bringing up a possibility -> evaluating it for logical consistency -> another possibility -> evaluating it for logical consistency, Ti-Ne, iteration, is a common theme throughout this whole questionnaire."
And as I replied earlier, the iteration "should" be inverted for an LII: state a logical rule/principle -> bring up possibilities about it -> state another logical rule/principle -> bring up possibilities about it.
But on reflection, I do your version much more than mine. This suggests I'm coming up with possibilities (Ne) first,
then checking them for logical consistency (Ti).
As for your question, it depends on the context. I usually, but not always, like to fit ideas into theories or with other ideas, and not just consider them for their own sake. But, I don't mind that either.