Something that I've noticed with DCNH typings is that often what I see as most obvious, people use as the DCNH instead. DCNH with strongest apparent Ne is creative sub. And pretty much universally people type Elon as C-sub. There was a thread over in delta where what I saw as most striking and obvious about a person was their Si (and I thought they were SEI), but for others the Si is instead used to justify the subtype ascribed rather than assumed to be their main type. I like DCNH, but I don't like that it excuses or rewrites the entire way a person can come across, because then it just seems like a lot of muddying the waters. The approach of "looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, is probably a duck" is more the way I go about it.