Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Wiki definition of Si and SEI

  1. #1
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    EII land
    EII INFj
    698 Post(s)
    6 Thread(s)

    Default Wiki definition of Si and SEI

    My SEI nephew doesnít relate to the Wikipedia definition of Si... itís got me wondering what is wrong

    Any answers? Donít mistype him heís SEI!
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?

    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:

  2. #2
    Jesus is the cruel sausage consentingadult's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    109 Post(s)
    0 Thread(s)


    The definition on Wikipedia (or did you mean Wikisocion?) is too short to be meaningful to the average person. Apart from that, in general self-knowledge is typically not an individual's strong point. At least that is what social psychologists teach us, and I agree.

    And finally there is the option that you are wrong after all....
    ďI have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.Ē --- Pippi Longstocking

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts