My SEI nephew doesn’t relate to the Wikipedia definition of Si... it’s got me wondering what is wrong
Any answers? Don’t mistype him he’s SEI!
Wiki definition of Si and SEI
My SEI nephew doesn’t relate to the Wikipedia definition of Si... it’s got me wondering what is wrong
Any answers? Don’t mistype him he’s SEI!
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
The definition on Wikipedia (or did you mean Wikisocion?) is too short to be meaningful to the average person. Apart from that, in general self-knowledge is typically not an individual's strong point. At least that is what social psychologists teach us, and I agree.
And finally there is the option that you are wrong after all....
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote