Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Bored? Help me find my DCNH subtype (video)

  1. #1
    Emily's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    TIM
    IEI-Fe 1w2
    Posts
    199
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Bored? Help me find my DCNH subtype (video)

    Last edited by Emily; 01-25-2020 at 10:50 PM. Reason: Broken link

  2. #2
    a two horned unicorn renegade COVID 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    meta^{∞}physical realm
    TIM
    ILE-C-I
    Posts
    5,269
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Based on your link

    I'd say a robot and therefore normalizing.
    Measuring you right now

    Winning is for losers

  3. #3
    Emily's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    TIM
    IEI-Fe 1w2
    Posts
    199
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Heretic 007, working now?
    Last edited by Emily; 01-25-2020 at 10:52 PM.

  4. #4
    silke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4,910
    Mentioned
    424 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Emily View Post
    @Heretic 007, working now?
    It's working and .... you're giving off creative subtype vibes. Which is an interesting combination for an e1.

    edit: actually change that to Harmonizing
    Last edited by silke; 01-25-2020 at 11:28 PM.

  5. #5
    Emily's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    TIM
    IEI-Fe 1w2
    Posts
    199
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silke View Post
    It's working and .... you're giving off creative subtype vibes. Which is an interesting combination for an e1.

    edit: actually change that to Harmonizing
    Thanks @silke. At this point I can see any of the types except Normalizing...but yeah, leaning towards Harmonizing. Was curious if anyone else would see that, too, or if I'd get an insight that would help me see a blind spot.

  6. #6
    silke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4,910
    Mentioned
    424 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Emily View Post
    Thanks @silke. At this point I can see any of the types except Normalizing...but yeah, leaning towards Harmonizing. Was curious if anyone else would see that, too, or if I'd get an insight that would help me see a blind spot.
    Hmm yeah as you have mentioned yourself in the video you're not ignoring, and since you don't VI/speak like a D-subtype that only leaves Harmonizing on the table.

    On a typing sidenote, you might also take a closer look at the instincual stacking, bc you VI like syn-flow so/sx and not the contra flow sx/so.

  7. #7
    Emily's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    TIM
    IEI-Fe 1w2
    Posts
    199
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silke View Post
    On a typing sidenote, you might also take a closer look at the instincual stacking, bc you VI like syn-flow so/sx and not the contra flow sx/so.
    I wonder if it's just the Fe coming through? Or being a little nervous, I wasn't fully myself.

    I toy with the idea of So/Sx every so often. Have had people close to me IRL confirm they think I'm Sexual, but it's hard to know which area I feel the issues most strongly since I've had seasons where one instinct feels harder or more "triggered" than in another season. I looked at Beatrice Chestnut's descriptions of the Social One as "Non-Adaptability" and Sexual One as "Zeal" and didn't find much clarity there, but I resonate with the idea of being a countertype
    Last edited by Emily; 01-26-2020 at 05:57 AM.

  8. #8
    a two horned unicorn renegade COVID 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    meta^{∞}physical realm
    TIM
    ILE-C-I
    Posts
    5,269
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    You don't seem to fit H or C.

    Anyways there are presubtyped IEI's.

    Dominant: Renata Litinova https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zP8dFR9tSA
    Creative: SergeyZverev https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arvUE_7dHGQ
    Normalizing: Gregory Vitsin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zHxzr74jZQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPlM9wm01Jk
    Harmonizing: Oleg Mityaev https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLyQZaotoUE

    I think your organization fits best with dominant – the most financially capable IEI.
    Measuring you right now

    Winning is for losers

  9. #9
    Emily's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    TIM
    IEI-Fe 1w2
    Posts
    199
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Heretic 007 View Post
    You don't seem to fit H or C.

    Anyways there are presubtyped IEI's.

    Dominant: Renata Litinova https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zP8dFR9tSA
    Creative: SergeyZverev https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arvUE_7dHGQ
    Normalizing: Gregory Vitsin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zHxzr74jZQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPlM9wm01Jk
    Harmonizing: Oleg Mityaev https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLyQZaotoUE

    I think your organization fits best with dominant – the most financially capable IEI.
    The bathtub! The cat! Lol, where are these videos from? Thanks for your input...even though the cat video is more like my own life , I could see dominant considering the financially capable piece. I am pretty driven with my business and with goals in general.

  10. #10
    a two horned unicorn renegade COVID 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    meta^{∞}physical realm
    TIM
    ILE-C-I
    Posts
    5,269
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Emily View Post
    The bathtub! The cat! Lol, where are these videos from? Thanks for your input...even though the cat video is more like my own life , I could see dominant considering the financially capable piece. I am pretty driven with my business and with goals in general.
    Those are Gulenko's own typings from his machine translated website.
    https://socioniks.net/famouspeople
    Measuring you right now

    Winning is for losers

  11. #11

    Default

    the problem with the three dichotomies is that depending on your type you might not relate that much with them.

    contact types don't fear dangerous situations, and that doesn't mean social anxiety, but life threatening situations. their body releases adrenaline and noradrenalin, which makes them move towards a source of potential dangers, while distant types try to get away from a source of danger. (most women in my opinion fall into the distant dichotomy, which probably has biological reasons). contact types even look for this sort of thrill, regularily provoking arguments with others etc.

    terminating and initiating is a bit tricky depending on your rational/irrational dichotomy. terminating irrationals won't plan everything through, but they are able to set goals and go through with them on a long term basis. intitiating subtypes can be compared to sprinters. they move forward to tackle new problems, but it is difficult for them to bring things to completion when they get bored or lose interest. terminating subtypes can for example study something for a long period of time simply out of responsibility.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2c7ajzZ4zk

    connecting/ignoring can also be tricky if you are an ethical type, because you are constantly aware of the emotional atmosphere around you. what it means is more that you pay attention to external factors that change in your enviroment, and if the opinions of others influence your decisions or not.

    from your 2 minute video, my intuition got the impression that you are a normalising subtype.

  12. #12
    a two horned unicorn renegade COVID 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    meta^{∞}physical realm
    TIM
    ILE-C-I
    Posts
    5,269
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Emily View Post
    The bathtub! The cat! Lol, where are these videos from? Thanks for your input...even though the cat video is more like my own life , I could see dominant considering the financially capable piece. I am pretty driven with my business and with goals in general.
    Yeah very business-like style. Also very driven style in the video. That is a lot for Te PoLR.
    Another normalizing here IEI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62Aeh7CwxNw - kind of grounding and withdrawn thinking you are quite far and it actually looks like you would "appreciate" this sort of "dictation".
    Measuring you right now

    Winning is for losers

  13. #13
    Emily's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    TIM
    IEI-Fe 1w2
    Posts
    199
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soundofconfusion View Post
    terminating irrationals won't plan everything through, but they are able to set goals and go through with them on a long term basis.
    This is usually me if I really want something. I think it's what has enabled me to be so self-sufficient, but self-sufficiency can also make you look like you never need anything...trying to get better about that.

    connecting/ignoring can also be tricky if you are an ethical type, because you are constantly aware of the emotional atmosphere around you. what it means is more that you pay attention to external factors that change in your enviroment, and if the opinions of others influence your decisions or not.
    I'll have to think on this one more...my Ni is hard to sway and I've pretty much always followed my own path, but I can see how others' opinions have influenced me if we're really close.

    from your 2 minute video, my intuition got the impression that you are a normalising subtype.
    And now one vote for normalizing! @Heretic 007 noticed I seem driven (which I am), is that common for normalising?

    Hey thanks for taking the time to contribute your knowledge, I appreciate it I'm curious if you've experienced a change in subtype in your own life?

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Emily View Post
    This is usually me if I really want something. I think it's what has enabled me to be so self-sufficient, but self-sufficiency can also make you look like you never need anything...trying to get better about that.



    I'll have to think on this one more...my Ni is hard to sway and I've pretty much always followed my own path, but I can see how others' opinions have influenced me if we're really close.



    And now one vote for normalizing! @Heretic 007 noticed I seem driven (which I am), is that common for normalising?

    Hey thanks for taking the time to contribute your knowledge, I appreciate it I'm curious if you've experienced a change in subtype in your own life?
    I have always been a creative subtype. I've noticed subtype changes among my family and friends, but it was usually during a life changing event. I would say that dominant subtypes are very unlikely to browse this website, since they have a low focus on introverted functions and are therefore not very self-reflective (it's a hindrance for dominant behaviour). they are usualls out there improving the efficiency of their enviroment

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    11,601
    Mentioned
    1058 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    subtypes is non-Socionics nonsense
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  16. #16
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    7,585
    Mentioned
    846 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    subtypes is non-Socionics nonsense
    Hi, @Sol. Nice to see you again.

    And no, subtypes are not nonsense. They go a long way towards explaining why the ESI-Fi types drift towards me and the ESI-Se subtypes are irritated by me. Lol.

  17. #17

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    11,601
    Mentioned
    1058 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    And no, it isn't.
    Socionics is Jung + Augustinavichiute [in their correct and possibly correct parts, where Jung's word is weighter] + anything new objectively proved about Jung types

    Gulenko's fantasies about DCNH subtypes are non of this. formally, it should be called as one of hypothetical personality typologies

    the other approach is to mislead noobs by assigning random hypotheses to Socionics brand. baseless and doubtful ones which have high chance to be incorrect. then people think about Socionics what it's not and do mistakes which could be avoided
    the main application of those theory additions is to mask the controvertion to normal theory. to mask the mistakes, which are very common for today typology practice (what's evident in high % of typing mismatches)

    use the normal scientific approach to Socionics as you'd do with other knowledges. that Socionics stays on hypotheses level does not mean anything may be called by this term. it's not a game
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  18. #18
    What's the purpose of SEI? Tallmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Finland
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    2,430
    Mentioned
    167 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This is how I type IEI subtypes:

    Dominant IEI: Maria Veitola, Finnish talk show host
    Creative IEI: Roman Polanski, movie director
    Normalizing IEI: this guy, gardener
    Harmonizing IEI: Emmanuelle Seigner, actress

    Hope it helps. Just my 2 cents
    A true sense-perception certainly exists, but it always looks as though objects were not so much forcing their way into the subject in their own right as that the subject were seeing things quite differently, or saw quite other things than the rest of mankind. As a matter of fact, the subject perceives the same things as everybody else, only, he never stops at the purely objective effect, but concerns himself with the subjective perception released by the objective stimulus.
    (Jung on Si)


    My Pinterest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •