Filthy alpha know-it-all
Filthy beta aristocrat
Coeruleum is not merely a natural human being
I loathe Coeruleum with my shriveled soul
Socionics can't into real
If you are amused by or “like” something... then why is that not a good way to look for what people value? Do you think say, Director Abbie, would like exactly the same kinds of sick owns all the time as, say, flames? It’s certainly a much more organic and scientific manner of doing it than asking them, where they are already going to be fully aware of what archetypes indicate certain types.
I sometimes press like not because I like or agree with what they're saying, but because they make a fair point, or I respect their passion. Maybe I'm just crazy.
It is very clear to me that coer has 4D Fe/Ne and 1D Si/Ti. Coer is using both Ne and Fe in a way that it exceeds standardized social norms, hence both IEs aren't two dimensional. I can't see 3D Ti. I have seen EIEs who are more explicit about their Ti-seeking and I have seen EIEs who wants to appear more efficient at it. Just to note that, the ones who are more explicit actually more all over the place when they are explaining themselves or a phenomenon. I think coer could explain herself more clearly, however, Ti isn't equal to expressing yourself clearly. In overall, all representatives of each type would be different due to different enneagram type, stacking and subtype, hence they will have a different level of accentuated IEs and they will represent themselves differently. Hence, it isn't valid to type someone as another type because of different preferred representation.
This kind of attack make sense for 2D Se, plus if coer is indeed a Fe-dom and so first, coer's Se will manifest itself by attempts to diminish her targets socially since Se in social hierarchy is more valued than personalized attack. Fi valuers (especially Fi>Fe) with so last more prone to attempt to personalized attacks. However, Se role also does this.
Both ENFx makes sense for coer. I don't see any Fi, but it isn't the only reason that I think coer is EIE, since same behavior can be explained in terms of NeFe or FeNe. I agree with Alonzo, coer manifest DA cognition and Ne of coer is very synthetical, coer combines different kinds of perception in order to create somehow a completely different perception. Ne- of IEE generally manifests itself with finding alternative perception, pointing a single essence of perception much more than synthetical perception. Hence, I strongly think that coer is EIE instead of IEE.
I am thinking C or D in terms of coer's DCHN type. I am still undecided about her subtype in two subtype system any opinions?
Ok this fucks me up. But in any case, liking a post (except in the case of accidental likes) should mean that there is SOME aspect of the post (or poster) that you value. Or that it’s some political action, such as done sarcastically.
Edit: Oh ok. Formal logic /lalaland bubble-esque logical is not the same as overall logical to me and in the layman’s sense of it.
"The bluestocking is the most odious character in society...she sinks wherever she is placed, like the yolk of an egg, to the bottom, and carries the filth with her."
Does this look like a “direct Se HA” insult to you @voider ? He is copypasting lines from poems.
Or is he a mistyped IxE...
Ok, given that I am once again riding the no sleep choo choo train all the way from Wally World to Las Vegas, I’m going to give my greatest effort on compiling a post out of all these clusterfuck replies. Bear with me! I have picked up that to others it seems my Ne base typing is stemming from some type of venomous feelings surrounding her/Ne bases— wrong. It’s just impossible to not be slapped in the face by her Ne all the time and I understand it is the demonstrative function of an Ni creative individual but... When I examine her behavior and compare it to other Ni creatives on here I simply see in her a constant effort in gathering more and more off-the-wall ideas just for the sake of that alone and sharing it with the world... Ne. Ne. Ne. That is all I see. I am able to see the argument for either side (Ni creative vs. Ne base...), and I think sbbds made an especially great argument for it (Alonzo, I think you are very gifted in intuition and explaining the facts of a situation but I thought sbbds Se/Ti observations were spot on, so this brings us to another argument of “Typology is not a perfect system and some people simply DO NOT fit into one type... I am familiar with this myself in my wars waged between EIE and SEE, but not the crossover that is IEE, for me lol.) Anyways, let me a attempt to find the point and runneth along your palms.
If I really wanted to, I could go through her other posts/threads for more evidence, but what stuck out to me like a sore thumb in this thread was:
“Social causes are meh”
This is a tiny statement but it confirms what has been lurking in my head over all this: she does not care about the greater good of the group and the survival of the pack and doing everything, to a neurotic extent, of making it and the emotional environment constantly running. Her use of Fe is just “Look at me! Praise me and everything I have to say” —> Fe HA. And she does so in a totally unfiltered way. ENFx is controversial in general but I would say Ne is by far the more controversial, argumentative, unfiltered punch in this case. EIE has Se HA - they thirst for everything Se base has, underneath their other oriented exterior: shiny things, money, power, glory, looks, etc. They are the ultimate try hards at being “cool” and they compact their Ne with Ni in a way that will make them more easily accessible; there is no great leader without an accessible image and clearly defined messages. As far as I’ve observed, she does not give a grated fuck about any of that- she is scattered to the extreme, does not care about any Se related images, is very vague and unloads things that would not be easily accessible to anyone who isn’t informed on what she’s speaking of (random german shit, etc.).
Screaming for attention does not make you EIE.
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
I think these are all spot on points you’re making too @flames .
I feel like in socionics, Fe should in theory not be about caring about the group so much, as just being about emotional expression, especially in EIE. Fe leads have Fi ignoring. They don’t really explicitly care about inner sentiments, or value it more than expression. I very rarely if ever see sincere, personal, heartfelt one-on-one dialogue between coer and other members. It is an internet discussion forum, but any static type with conscious Fi is going to be more personal and hands on. Anyway, I think this bit about the ignoring function is a good addition of info compared to the MBTI/JCF rendition of Fe dominant types. I feel like this distinction is not really exposed or explored enough in socionics. We also don’t have too many people identifying as Fe leading types on this forum.
Besides the Ne vs. Ne demonstrative stuff, I also can’t see evidence of her valuing Si over having a more hot-cold approach to it, or being drawn to things that seem to represent devaluation of it.
MBTI Fe is certainly a different beast that I have ran my pitchfork at, you’re correct... But that was another thing I was going to bring up: what other EIE is there on here for us to compare her to? I know there were a handful of self identified ones in forums’ past, but NONE of them are anything like her... And if we are to compare me to her, considering mostly everyone up at this point has changed their perception of me through the EIE lens... I value my emotional expression over any inner sentiment but “having a more hot-cold approach to it, or being drawn to things that seem to represent devaluation of it.” is precisely how I would describe my own relationship to Si, as someone who is supposedly Si ignoring.
If anything, I see her being Fi PoLR because she is totally blind to people’s inner sentiments, not merely just ignoring them.
Back to Fe, though. Fe values interaction for the purpose of emotional expression or getting hooked on sharing feelings, because sharing a feeling leads to greater expression of a feeling. So, by this nature, they revolve around groups far more than Fi, in either system. Fi is turned off by this and views it as shallow, and their inner sentiments carve through the expression of feelings and shared emotions in a way that makes it more complicated; Fi will be the party pooper, the passive-aggressive, etc. because they value the inner sentiment above all. Fe will get enveloped in a warm, fuzzy feeling because of something great that’s happened in their life and want to go out and party with a group of people and share this emotion with everyone... unless suddenly the party goes cynical, then they will become confused and emulate that feeling because they see it as the main emotion being expressed at the time and they want to express the hell out of it, damn you! ...Fi will have something great happen in their life and simply be happy with that. They might want to go out and party too, but they don’t feel this soul crushing urge to express it with everybody (which, would definitely lead to a group forming. ).
Hopefully this all made sense.
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
Intensity does not indicate competence. Suggestive is usually used where base is in use.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Well, there’s @Dauphin for EIEs I guess lol.
Who, again, I don’t think is anything like her, beyond a superficial “2deep” thing. I find his “intuitive” remarks a lot more blistering and focused compared to how her intuition works (Ni can come off as simultaneously deep and blunt, smothered in bitchy), and his Fe seems quite different. But I think he is actually Ni base TBH. But he is for sure Ni ego, and his posts don’t seem anywhere near as scattered.
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
BTW, I am not closing the EIE option; I was set on IEE, then I briefly agreed with EIE, then back to IEE, now ILE... I am simply comparing what I’ve seen from her over the years to the new things that are being thrown at us. This can take us on a typological rollercoaster, if you will.
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
I know it is, I just meant it could be just as easily used as a response to typing her any ego, not just Ti, if we were to nitpick everything she says.
Or that I could turn it on myself by my own intensity of what would be labeled “X” function and type myself totally different than anything anyone else has typed me as.
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
Most of my intellectual posts have been on philosophy of science, logic, topology, etc. Do I like literature? Yes, but that's an art. I couldn't care less about moralistic social justice nonsense. I had to teach everyone algebra in 5th grade because I had already learned calculus and set theory. Think whatever you'd like though and go complain about how the world did wrong you.
I was also way more antagonistic and pretentious way back. Are you even reading the same forum as me? It's OK, your wife will be back to tie you down shortly.
If you all have nothing better to do than play insincere games arguing about how someone objectively acts, you don't get a 16types Adventure.
...Or better yet, you do, but you'll be immortalized in quite unflattering ways. I'm not asking you to like me. I'm asking you to not be disingenuous.
My quadra cuz you like my story.
That is overly simplistic but I don't know what else.....
I don't really see Fi valuers saying things like 'Normie' or anything. They instead would just BE Normies (without realizing they they are or paying any attention to it because it sounds so childish yet accurate) and then talking down on the non-Normies. Or something like that.
An IEE might say 'Normie' once in awhile as they like to balance and include everybody but secretly be wishing the person would just stop saying Normie and instead be more delta and proper. Like how the IEE Te valuing therapist from Psychology Today will want to relate to the nerdy IEI But also just wish they would get a real job and stop with the dumb video games.
But maybe, that is my harsh /unfair version of how I view 'Fi' but it seems that way to me objectively.
1.) I don't have a pipe.
2.) I don't worship Jung and I'm not very interested in reincarnation.
3.) I never claimed to be a great mathematician, unlike you claiming to be Steve Jobs. I could probably be considered an applied mathematician though. I have an account on Knot Atlas, the only site more dead than this, and as Verbrannte/Wyrd/Pallas I was doing a topological analysis of enneagram to sort out all the IELD forum beliefs. @Heretic 007 is more mathematical than I am, but I'm more of everything except a troll than you.
yeah, I relate labels such as "normie" to beta, hierarchies are important in beta, group belonging too, establishing power hierarchies and classify those who don't conform with derogatory terms seems a kind of Ni-Se game to me. Ne-Si types be more chill wtv
Right @ooo.
Normie is the epitome of Fe/Ti valuing. Ti because it's essentially a logical category and Fe because well.. you're calling somebody Normie. LoL
Like idk, a Delta news reporter person would totally ruin the essence of Normie. They would just say it all wrong and with the totally wrong tone. But... there are a few of them I think are Beta that would use it more correctly. 85-90% of them or so seem delta as hell tho.
Anyways, does anyone else find the following rather ridiculous:
Five people have ever discussed advanced mathematics on 16types.
1. @Heretic 007: seems to be mostly interested in multivariable calculus and non-Euclidean geometry, self-types ILE
2. @Vilen: seems to be mostly interested in number theory and also programming, self-types IEI
3. @Grendel: seems to mostly be interested in formal logic and also programing, self-types ESE or ILE-ish but doesn't care much anymore
4. @Subteigh: seems to be mostly interested in statistics and also programming, self-types EII
5. @coeruleum: seems to be mostly interested in lower-dimensional topology and formal logic, self-types EIE or ILE-ish but doesn't care much anymore
When four of your five mathematicians are typed as ethical types, something is wrong, though it might be sample bias rather than the typings considering having any mathematical skill and ethics are not exclusive in principle.
Let’s all abandon personality theory and call it a day.
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
One thing I didn't really mention or elucidate at any point: the stem-focus was mainly the product of a career choice I made because I was super pessimistic about the near-future job market, rather than an intrinsic love for it. In practice I actually really suck at more left-brained practices. I figured if I wanted to do something like learn video or sound editing or read up a repetoire of philosophy texts, those things would be easy enough that I could learn them in free time, while topics that came more difficult to me would come through the more rigorous formal academic route.
The subtle shit-talking I give to humanities has more to do with the fact that a sizable chunk of society absolutely refuses to take them seriously, rather than personal taking for granted. It was more playing to my weaknesses out of fear that I'd never get a reliable career as a museum curator or something like that. In general I have a hyper paranoid and logical-positivist outlook that puts a lot of stock on material conditions but not a lot of faith in personal determination.
On the other hand, teachers specifically I have a lower respect for than I probably should, likely due to how often some of them whinge about how hard their lives are in front of a captive audience of students who are even more in the dark than they are. And also a lot of them do seem constantly stressed from having to read and grade things all the time, so I didn't want to go there under any circumstances. Most people who know me say my best skill is high-quality writing, but I don't have much faith in the job market for this skill, especially not now that AI is replacing things like the Copywriting business, for instance.
Just thought this bit would be elucidating.
I don't think society takes all the STEM stuff very seriously either, but just uses it as an excuse to bash the humanities and arts. Look how horrible social sciences are right now, for example, or string theory still being popular somehow. Idiots just like making people worry about money when that doesn't help anyone ever, as nice as money is to have. Personal determination is overrated and you should listen to The Killing Moon on loop instead.
In a few days I could collect a bunch of extra literary magazines and send them to you. Just because people fling around "hahaha your art/philosophy degree is dumdum" jokes doesn't mean people aren't forced to take the arts, culture, politics, and "liberal arts" areas seriously anyways (and I do prefer this kind of "liberal arts" over "left-brained" fields, but I still have some of an intrinsic interest in them that's much higher than, say, any "studies" field. Softer sciences and arts also tend to have huge overlap, for example, Thoreau's naturalism, or all the math and color theory every painter knows, or "math and music go together" starting with Pythagoras. So left-brained and right-brained are useful but not near a bimodal distribution.)
Don't use your classes to learn. Learn by networking and treat your classes like tests. If possible, CLEP out of as many as you can, though taking a couple is more useful than transferring to Exeter University or another obscure but real college like that since you get more programs to choose from and you can meet the people in them. No one will support this decision though, because they prefer to glamorize "the college experience" and slacking to not "be a nerd."
That doesn't exclude you from being a feeler? Posts like this makes it obviously so. That wasn't directed at you in any case.
I'm pretty sure more than 5 people have discussed advanced mathematics here, in your time being here maybe it's only those five, but not "ever." I have a bachelor degree in IT. I must be a mathematician too! Showing interest online doesn't equal competence. Your argument falls apart when these 4 people type themselves as ethical.
For the record, you regularly make personal jabs that are uncharacteristic for a logical type. You use personal stuff people share here against them nonchalantly. I have seen you do it at least twice. That is highly disrespectful, especially considering the nature of this forum where people are likely to share private things they have never shared with anyone else. That is my biggest issue with you. I don't know if it's immaturity or what, but I'm not surprised you have been banned before. It doesn't seem like there are things that are off limits for you.
If you do that to an ILE/SLE, you have made an enemy for life. These people very rarely share private matters that show weakness or vulnerability, and for a reason. They do not trust that people will not use that information to make hurtful remarks, like you do. LIE/LSE will not appreciate that part of you as well.