Something I might have noticed.
Anecdotal evidence welcome
"Friends with Benefits" > Benefit ITR ?
Something I might have noticed.
Anecdotal evidence welcome
Then, the angel asked her what her name was. She said: "I have none"
The term "friends with benefits" I met for the meaning of long time pals relations which have a sex sometimes.
I do not expect large % of order IR in such relations, as this IR is not placed to good ones.
Needs to note, that an orderer has higher than average possibility to inspire a sympathy, but it's doubtful to have an interest to support interactions for long.
For fwb it seems three prerequisites must be met:
The two people must like each other/be friends.
They must find each other physically or sexually attractive.
They both must be willing to establish such a relationship.
Based on what I have observed, the following ITR's are the most appropriate for this type of relationship.
In descending order of recommendation:
Beneficiary
Benefactor
Mirror
Quasi-Identical
(*)
Take note that these are the most common due to the fact that the participants are not as likely to fall in love with each other, in which case it would probably become a formal relationship, or a passing romance.
(*)I had included conflict too, but conflict usually develops into a failed romance, and sometimes from fwb slides into an unhappy marriage, so it's not recommended
Then, the angel asked her what her name was. She said: "I have none"
Interesting. I've never personally experienced this or observed this. Any specific type pairs you've seen?Originally Posted by lavos
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote