Typology Random Thoughts

[Sol]

ESEs have got to be the best types at pretending to work and getting out of obligations.

You are talking about taken objective obligations and then objective results. It's Te. For F types is harder to use such criterions.

To "pretending to work" predispose different reasons. Efficient management needs besides a control, a good planing and organising, motivation, using abbilities and personal attractions of wokers.
Place ESE to a kitchen and those will be motivated and good there, with minimum of controlling need. Place them on calculations - and you should get problems instead of good results. Additionally, their significant efforts will be directed to keep the occupation, what makes results even worse.

[Sol]

What can the rational/irrational dichotomy be confused with?

examples:
disorders as ADHD should change the behavior to common of P types
good verbal skills (FN) and education allows (when wished) to talk with good structure to shift the behavior closer to J types

> On description alone, maybe with valued and unvalued functions Ne-Si and Ni-Se

bad theory understanding and lack of quality data may lead to anything
valued functions is doubtful to understand without IR (including with yourself). or without cases of radical expression, to know which may need to know a human better than in typing interview and small public data

I remember when "EII" said that likes one of violence/guro accented anime (Se value). This interest was not clear in questionnaire or interview, nothing of close. After geting doubts and gathering of different data, including IR with pals, I assigned IEI.

[HeInin]

Noooooo!!

[HolyKnowing]

Actually I'm not LII. @Ocean Man correctly discerned my type as ILI. A certain tell-tale sign that I must be ILI happened.

[VewyScawwyNawcissist]

[Bethanyclaire]

The weirdest type to me is probs certain LIE-ni. Although I can think of one cool LIE-ni and one interesting LIE-ni. Weird to think ESE-si might see me this way- even though it’s the type I most idolise in a way.

Edit: scrap that I remembered I had a crush on an LIE-ni once. Maybe it is more about women and generally about this type. But certain ones will stand out as cool.

[Nunki]

If I understand Socionics correctly, an individual's PoLR is supposed to be their weakest information element. This makes no sense. If, for example, Ni is your strongest IM, your weakest IM should be its opposite, Se. When two things oppose each other, intensifying one of them makes the other weaker; e.g. more darkness means less light, and more light means less darkness.

[Alive]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2hzYmL2AkQ&t=258s

occasionally watching speedrun explanations really makes me more and more convinced that Ni is perfectionistic, detail-oriented thinking. like, who else comes up with this stuff? it's obsessive, almost autism like thinking. this can be applied to aerospace engineering, or to people discussing 800 gender pronouns. most people in typology focus too much on character traits when they should be focusing on general patterns. one Ni base type can know all the variants of some horoscope, the next one has studied plants in-depth. they have nothing in common interest-wise, but they share the same detail-orientation.