I KNOW THIS HAS BEEN GONE OVER A MILLION TIMES, AND I APOLOGIZE IF THAT BOTHERS YOU. HOW MUCH CAN BE SAID ABOUT SOCIONICS ANYWAY, SHOULD I MAKE UP A NEW SUBTYPE SYSTEM? BAH
Just curious what will be said by the forum as it stands in the current climate. I also find it to be an interesting topic.
I request that you go forth. An objective and detached description, a life story, whatever.


Reply With Quote


- 
(as per tcaudilllg)
); and it looks like Ti for its will to understand the world, but with the difference that Ni doesn’t advance a strict vision to anything, while Ti are overly categorical.
: "N" refers to input that has a predominantly relativistic perspective on information while "i" refers to a process of continually comparing input to a central reference that is comprised of a body of knowledge having an N-perspective. The reference is information that has been validated by the ego (as being true) even though some of it may not be entirely accurate. "N" and "i" are independent of one another; "i" refers to how "N" is configured in an information control system.
