what if I'm an LSE and it's just my enneagram making you think I'm an IEI?Originally Posted by mclane
There's plenty of statements you're making and not using evidence to back them up. I'm with Samson, we should just label you a cretinous troll and move on, you can be the village idiot and never taken seriously again.
That's what you betas do, right? Name calling and labeling things (incorrectly) with your own faulty interpretations of things. You truly are contemptible; since you are unable to produce anything of value, you have to put down those who due their natural ability to observe and derive connections from things are able to come up with a correlation like this I've expounded on this thread. What a pity.
You're a drama queen, you're disrespectful, attention seeking, and not too bright. If you are not an EIE-Fe, or an IEI-Fe (a negative one since I hold these types in semi-high regard-- among betas that is), you must be an ESE. LSE's have more worthwhile contributions than this (such as Sol, as faulty as he is, his contribution is infinitely more valuable and worthwhile, than yours).
"Name calling and labeling things (incorrectly) with your own faulty interpretations of things. "
I like the irony. You're good at this.
In your own (faulty) opinion"Name calling and labeling things (incorrectly) with your own faulty interpretations of things. "
If I'm behaving like his towards queentiger is because she might seem to need this kind of attention or at least it seems it's what she is inviting with her behavior.
ESEs are Fe+ leads, they are absolutely not attention seeking, disrespectful drama queens. Clearly the mockery of your simple toddler mind has gone over your head.
However, you are yet to provide evidence for any of your correlations. You can tell others how genius you are with all this unnecessary posturing all you want, but no one buys it. Also you (if I remember rightly) believe in God, therefore proving how dumb you truly are.
First of all, ESE is -Fe base. Being a blunt fucker and angrily telling others their bullshit is intimately related with -Fe. Furthermore, 95% of people believe in a higher power (in one way or another). You are saying 95% of humanity are retarded? Einstein for example was agnostic. Was Einstein retarded?
I don't care if any if you beta fuckers believe my correlations or not. Let's see for example what the reaction was of an ILI who posted in this thread: he realized there might be something to what I am saying, and came up with his own correlation, then asked me to discuss them. Mission accomplished (on my part). But from you ESE/beta fuckers, I expect very little from you. Keep on with you inability to type yourself correctly and your useless drama (starting a thread calling those who have valid alternative typings "retards", etc).
I mean there is a good chance the majority of people are retarded and/or easily manipulated. Being agnostic is not retarded, every human is technically agnostic.
ESE is not "Fe-" base at all, learn some model G. You're saying I have an inability to type myself correctly based on absolutely nothing besides you disagreeing with it - as if you're always right and everyone else is always wrong. You have not provided any sort of evidence for what you are claiming as fact. Your hatred for betas is clouding your judgement, and your lack of intelligence is noticeable.
Model G is shit. Gulenko went off the deep end with model G. Model B is a much better model.
What sort of evidence would you like to see, ma'am? Is there evidence for socionics at all?. I think you might have mistaken your expenditure of ample mental resources (since you feel entitled to emit a judgment on mine) on coming to this fringe theory known as Socionics.
No but the difference is you are claiming others can't type themselves correctly based on just your opinion. You are the one using your hatred of a certain quadra to type others. You are the only making dumb mistakes like "SEE-Si". I mean if you lack this much self awareness then you should probably just leave.Model G is shit. Gulenko went off the deep end with model G. Model B is a much better model.
What sort of evidence would you like to see, ma'am? Is there evidence for socionics at all?. I think you might have mistaken your expenditure of ample mental resources (since you feel entitled to emit a judgment on mine
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote