User Tag List

Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Yo!

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    kannonzak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    TIM
    5w6 582
    Posts
    28
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Yo!

    Starting a new account. Hoping for more luck to discuss things in this forum.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    13,331
    Mentioned
    1265 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    making videointerview for typing adds +100 to the luck
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  3. #3
    kannonzak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    TIM
    5w6 582
    Posts
    28
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    making videointerview for typing adds +100 to the luck
    will probably do that if i start to doubt my type again next time.

    but i am open to discussion about my type anytime tho lol

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    13,331
    Mentioned
    1265 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anagata View Post
    will probably do that if i start to doubt my type again next time
    to be sure in own type I'd recommend only after IR checking with >10 people IRL
    you type them and check how IR effects from them fit to the theory. those people should be in informal and relatively close communication with you, for significant time

    it's much harder to be misleaded about your type if you'll get positive results after this checking
    also you'd got not bad confirmation about your typing skills and types theory understanding
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  5. #5
    kannonzak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    TIM
    5w6 582
    Posts
    28
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    to be sure in own type I'd recommend only after IR checking with >10 people IRL
    you type them and check how IR effects from them fit to the theory. those people should be in informal and relatively close communication with you, for significant time
    So far i've typed like 6 people irl, three of them still arguable tho
    but for the other three, our IR based on our types are quite consistent, either for the advantages or the shortcomings. But i still let the options wide open.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    it's much harder to be misleaded about your type if you'll get positive results after this checking
    also you'd got not bad confirmation about your typing skills and types theory understanding
    guess i need to learn the theory deeper before try to type more people lol, since it seems like socionics has less confusions yet complex typing than mbti. will discuss the questions i get about it later, thanks!

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    13,331
    Mentioned
    1265 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anagata View Post
    So far i've typed like 6 people irl, three of them still arguable tho
    3 humans mb not enough to be sure in your concrete type

    when I did that, among first people I typed were close relatives, meaningful pals known for years and some classmates - to get those >10 of people. I used VI much - intuitive impressions from peoples' nonverbal, to which types traits they seemed to be closer - to emotional F or reasonable T, as example. some people as relatives did a test also. to type only by common behavior would made the task go too slowly. it took some monthes to understand own type and peoples types to the degree all has fited good to the theory of IR and about types behavior

    it's what I recommend to be sure in your type. the only good way, I'd say. based on what was with me. I've studed typing during this process and understood what types are on practice, on real people I know good. that was many years ago, I typed many people later, saw how people of types may behave differently, changed opinions about some % of people. but never doubted in own type still

    > guess i need to learn the theory deeper before try to type more people lol

    I trust to and prefer to use basics: dichotomies, 8 functions, values, strong/weak functions, IR theory
    to assume types is possibly to start with dichotomies descriptions. then to understand ego functions in a human, his valued ones
    it's not much of info to read

    Filatova's book is the only normal Socionics source in English today. amazon sells it. good for beginners. Jung's book is obligate to read, X chapter. then mb read the rest mess as you'll get the base to accept it more correctly, to understand what is the typology essence and where go secondary and more muddy hypotheses which deserve lesser of trust

    > since it seems like socionics has less confusions yet complex typing than mbti

    MBTI users practically are concentrated on dichotomies and the rest is not used seriously. they even recommend that MBTI test results stayed untouched in majority of cases - just to ignore other theory lol. while as any dichotomy test MBTI should to have <50% of accuracy. so they may get a half of cases which suspect were wrong but they are demanded just to ignore that. it's about relation there to anything besides dichotomies

    by talking style you remind me ILI
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •