Starting a new account. Hoping for more luck to discuss things in this forum.
Starting a new account. Hoping for more luck to discuss things in this forum.
making videointerview for typing adds +100 to the luck
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
to be sure in own type I'd recommend only after IR checking with >10 people IRL
you type them and check how IR effects from them fit to the theory. those people should be in informal and relatively close communication with you, for significant time
it's much harder to be misleaded about your type if you'll get positive results after this checking
also you'd got not bad confirmation about your typing skills and types theory understanding
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
So far i've typed like 6 people irl, three of them still arguable tho
but for the other three, our IR based on our types are quite consistent, either for the advantages or the shortcomings. But i still let the options wide open.
guess i need to learn the theory deeper before try to type more people lol, since it seems like socionics has less confusions yet complex typing than mbti. will discuss the questions i get about it later, thanks!
3 humans mb not enough to be sure in your concrete type
when I did that, among first people I typed were close relatives, meaningful pals known for years and some classmates - to get those >10 of people. I used VI much - intuitive impressions from peoples' nonverbal, to which types traits they seemed to be closer - to emotional F or reasonable T, as example. some people as relatives did a test also. to type only by common behavior would made the task go too slowly. it took some monthes to understand own type and peoples types to the degree all has fited good to the theory of IR and about types behavior
it's what I recommend to be sure in your type. the only good way, I'd say. based on what was with me. I've studed typing during this process and understood what types are on practice, on real people I know good. that was many years ago, I typed many people later, saw how people of types may behave differently, changed opinions about some % of people. but never doubted in own type still
> guess i need to learn the theory deeper before try to type more people lol
I trust to and prefer to use basics: dichotomies, 8 functions, values, strong/weak functions, IR theory
to assume types is possibly to start with dichotomies descriptions. then to understand ego functions in a human, his valued ones
it's not much of info to read
Filatova's book is the only normal Socionics source in English today. amazon sells it. good for beginners. Jung's book is obligate to read, X chapter. then mb read the rest mess as you'll get the base to accept it more correctly, to understand what is the typology essence and where go secondary and more muddy hypotheses which deserve lesser of trust
> since it seems like socionics has less confusions yet complex typing than mbti
MBTI users practically are concentrated on dichotomies and the rest is not used seriously. they even recommend that MBTI test results stayed untouched in majority of cases - just to ignore other theory lol. while as any dichotomy test MBTI should to have <50% of accuracy. so they may get a half of cases which suspect were wrong but they are demanded just to ignore that. it's about relation there to anything besides dichotomies
by talking style you remind me ILI
Types examples: video bloggers, actors