Quote Originally Posted by Singu View Post
Wow Myst, kinda disappointed that you've already given up the fight without you having to explain anything. Not that I really care.

Anyway, you say that Socionics is wrong, but you can't really explain why it's wrong. You just think that "science" will somehow prove it wrong and that the authorities of "science" will bring down the judgement. Ironically this is the kind of thing that make people accuse it of being "scientism".

I already know why it's wrong. You're not going to make Socionics "more scientific" by making it more statistical.
No, Singu, I just do not debate with an idiot.