Belle Delphine

[gone]

i read this thread and felt motivated.my friends read this thread and felt motivated.my neighbors read this and were motivated.we rent a projector in a big field and my village people read this and felt motivated.thank you so much for this thread. may god bless you.

[ooo]

smh

[Adam Strange]

people pay quite a lot of money for her bath water. hard to judge how much she's worth tbh.

Maybe they plan to clone her from her shedded skin cells.

[para]

EVERYONE I DO NOT LIKE IS IN MY EPHEMERAL OPPOSITE QUADRA

[ooo]

I like ESIs, they're nice bitches <3

[ooo]

SEEs are bad bitches but they make good friends, sometimes

[Raver]

I know you're being intentionally obtuse, but anyway -- I didn't say that Peterson assaulted anyone; just that he deceived them. That's what a grifter does.

How does he deceive them? He offers advice, people can take it or leave it, it is their choice. He sells books that have value to the men and women who buy them. If someone doesn't like him or what he has to say then they don't buy his books, pretty simple. The same goes with his other capitalistic opportunities, nobody is pressured to do any of it, they go on their own volition.

His expert advice all boils down to "conservatism improves mental health."

It looks like you haven't really delved into anything he wrote or says and you are just looking at the surface level of his interviews.

Do you consider it a psychological statement to call women "dragons of chaos"? Because that is the type of psychology he peddles.

On the other hand, what exactly do you find dishonest about Delphine?

Take him with a grain of salt by all means, but don't throw the baby out of the bathwater because he said a few things you disagreed with.

Fyi, I was exaggerating when I called Belle Delphine a grifter. On a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 is a respectable businessperson and 10 is a grifter, I would say she is a 6 and Jordan Peterson is a 4. She is an opportunist that is seeking to make money off of her body.

Basically being a whore without actually having sex. If she wants to do that, it is in her right to do so, but I see nothing wrong with calling a spade a spade. Jordan is a capitalist and an opportunist as well just like her, but it is less blatant and overt unlike Belle who uses her body and looks for the maximum amount of profit possible.

Let's not forget the subjective aspect of this, Belle looks more of an opportunist and deceiver to me and Jordan less, while the opposite is true for you because you like Belle more and I like Jordan more. Which is fine, it is a part of human nature to be blinded by bias at times, but let's not pretend that any of us are immune to that.

I'm suprised that so many people on this website use visual identification as a typing method. it's a very dubious approach in my opinion.

I don't use VI personally because I know I am not anywhere near good at it, but I think it has some limited use. However, the issue is that it requires a high level of expertise because it requires a lot of practice to get good at it and it is easy use it incorrectly, which a lot of people do. Unfortunately, they are unaware of their incompetence and incorrectly VI a lot of people.

[on a peaceful hiatus]

I don't use VI personally because I know I am not anywhere near good at it, but I think it has some limited use. However, the issue is that it requires a high level of expertise because it requires a lot of practice to get good at it and it is easy use it incorrectly, which a lot of people do. Unfortunately, they are unaware of their incompetence and incorrectly VI a lot of people.

the problem I see with it is that it's not a researched field. there are obviously patterns that should be analysed more, but there can also be exceptions. V. I. can give you a hint on what a person's type might be, but you should mostly focus on observing the cognitive functions that someone uses.

saying that she V.I.'s as SEI is really not an argument, and as a reader I can't really judge the subjective patterns that the person observed. I can however judge if someone's explanation of functional behaviour makes sense or not.

[Raver]

No matter what you think of Belle Delphine, this is pretty hilarious:

the problem I see with it is that it's not a researched field. there are obviously patterns that should be analysed more, but there can also be exceptions. V. I. can give you a hint on what a person's type might be, but you should mostly focus on observing the cognitive functions that someone uses.

saying that she V.I.'s as SEI is really not an argument, and as a reader I can't really judge the subjective patterns that the person observed. I can however judge if someone's explanation of functional behaviour makes sense or not.

Yes, which is why I don't use VI at all for typing people and rely on other methods. If someone wants to use VI then that's perfectly fine if they are competent at it, which is only really a handful of people in this forum tbh.

[on a peaceful hiatus]

Yes, which is why I don't use VI at all for typing people and rely on other methods. If someone wants to use VI then that's perfectly fine if they are competent at it, which is only really a handful of people in this forum tbh.

another thing that is imo important to consider is that a subtype seems to also play a huge role in someones appearance. Ekaterina Filatova mentioned this when she was collecting photos of types. with 7,7 billion people on this planet, it's hard to say how many subtypes even exist. Gulenko's DCNH system is the best system we have right now (imo) and it only differentiates 4 subtypes. there a just too many aspects that haven't been researched yet to make V.I. a valid way of typing.

[Raver]

another thing that is imo important to consider is that a subtype seems to also play a huge role in someones appearance. Ekaterina Filatova mentioned this when she was collecting photos of types. with 7,7 billion people on this planet, it's hard to say how many subtypes even exist. Gulenko's DCNH system is the best system we have right now (imo) and it only differentiates 4 subtypes. there a just too many aspects that haven't been researched yet to make V.I. a valid way of typing.

That's true. Personally, I put more stock into the two subtype system more than DCNH, but DCNH is still interesting regardless. Also, I think trying to VI her when she has a ton of makeup on to give her a specific look would probably skew her type a bit. This video might come in handy for that reason:

[The Reality Denialist]

there is no question about her DCNH type. It screams C.

But yeah H look sluggish, D's are domineering or power seeking and N are responsive ones like conforming to own their ideal via role (like LII who is bit of family man and gives compliments bit forced kind of way). It might be just me but lots of N's seem like they tend to lick the anus of their system they represent.

[on a peaceful hiatus]

there is no question about her DCNH type. It screams C.

But yeah H look sluggish, D's are domineering or power seeking and N are responsive ones like conforming to own their ideal via role (like LII who is bit of family man and gives compliments bit forced kind of way). It might be just me but lots of N's seem like they tend to lick the anus of their system they represent.

normalising subtypes have a low openess for things that contradict their own understanding. it takes a long time for them to open up for something new. this is actually a reason why socionics is so unknown. I've spoken with a couple of university professors in germany and they were all normalising subtypes. it's very hard for them to open up for new unknown theories that they haven't heard of yet, even if they are Ne base types. they advance faster in school compared to creative subtypes, because they are very orderly and do better at memorizing random data for tests. creative subtypes are messy, but they show much more creative thinking and are instinctively drawn to new theories (like Gulenko's SHS), but they are outsiders in the real world because of the terminating/initiating dichotomy. it's very hard for them to stick with something for a longer time period. since normalising prefer order so much, they prefer that everything just stays as it is, instead of risking change that could lead to chaotic consequences.

not sure about belle's subtype. haven't seen much of her to judge that. creative subtype probably makes the most sense.

[Spermatozoa]

She looks like the type to release your load in then detach from and leave discreetly.

[sbbds]

I thought ESI.

.... I mean ...

The golddigger sports model stereotype.

I guess she could be an SEI but normally the ratchet stereotype is the other way around.

[sbbds]

I'm suprised that so many people on this website use visual identification as a typing method. it's a very dubious approach in my opinion.

Yes, all of these people who have the time on their hands to post in some dark web corner peoplewatching forum, can't be expected to be using dubious approaches in life at any time.

[sbbds]

like I said, I haven't really analysed her that much. I remember watching an H3H3 video recently where she send Ethan a jar full of her own spit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQscyzNOBNY

I thought that her behaviour could be linked to Si as vulnerable or surpressed ignoring function, which is linked to sexuality, meaning that types with weak Si (LIE, EIE, SEE and SLE) often display their sexuality openly, or are even prone to perversion, or they have an unhealthy or unorthodox approach to sexuality. I think it applies to belle delphine. from my own observation and various socionics sources it seems that SEE is the type that is most inclined to prostitution, but belle delphine seems to also be a rather strategic and creative person, making me lean more towards EIE (who have Ne as 4 dimensional function). just my 2 cents.

I mostly agree with what you say here and EIE.

I don't think Si valuing would be into disgusting shit like this. In this video she spits, drinks it again, and spits it back out. That's exactly Si polr. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQscyzNOBNY

Her business capacity and weirdness are possibly Te role and Ne demonstrative. I'm gonna go with EIE, followed by ESI.

I know 3 women who have been prostitutes. 1 EIE, 1 ILE, 1 ESI.

[gone]

I thought ESI.

.... I mean ...

The golddigger sports model stereotype.

I guess she could be an SEI but normally the ratchet stereotype is the other way around.

yah if any type is to be seen as the thot type it's probably ESI lolol, since Alpha is probably the quadra that cares the least about material wealth etc

[sbbds]

yah if any type is to be seen as the thot type it's probably ESI lolol, since Alpha is probably the quadra that cares the least about material wealth etc

This chick makes bathwater for people to drink and makes them sick. Exactly the opposite of Si caretaking.

[Anglas]

Not gamma, thats for sure.

[Anglas]

What do you think @Adam Strange
Personally after watching couple videos, it felt like my energy went away or something.

[Adam Strange]

What do you think @Adam Strange
Personally after watching couple videos, it felt like my energy went away or something.

I think she's SEI. Her makeup video, and the entire way she surrounds herself with very, very high production values screams Si to me. All of her props are fun, light-hearted, and non-serious. Her best friend, the ILE, is an ugly octopus.

She is trying soooo hard to attract an ILE. She's acting like a little girl in the kitchen "Hey, little boy, come and play with me. I'm kind of stupid at this, so you can explain how to do everything! And I will listen in rapt attention to you and never, ever criticize. I mean, I looooooove ugly octopuses."

In her makeup video, she came out, dropped the masks, and revealed just how awesomely competent she is at doing public presentations. In that video, I thought she approached VI'ing like an ESI, but ESI's and SEI's have the same dimensionality of functions, and EVERYTHING else about her screams Alpha.

Anyone who can't see Alpha should brush up on their research, IMO.

[Adam Strange]

As to selling her bath water and making everyone sick, maybe she just doesn’t understand germ theory.

[lynn]

This chick makes bathwater for people to drink and makes them sick. Exactly the opposite of Si caretaking.

apparently she put a disclaimer that the bathwater is "not for drinking and should only be used for sentimental purposes”. however, what people actually do then with it is another matter.

[on a peaceful hiatus]

ugh, can't believe I've watched this video...

what I got out of the video is that I'm leaning towards Ni-Se valuing. she makes some small aristrocratic comments ("worship me peasant" @4:09). her whole apartment looks like a mysterious fantasy world, not really focused on reality. she has a lot of chokers. at 6:50 she shows a giant skull with a moon prism hanging on her wall... @9:51 there's a gun in her puppet house. lot's of Ni creativity in her, dunno why people think she's an SEI...

she kinda looks like Marzia in this video tbh.

despite having some much random stuff, her apartment looks extremly orderly, making me lean more towards her being a normalising subtype. so yeah, I think EIE makes the most sense for me (she didn't mention anything about her person, so it's still basically just an intuitive guess)

I feel like I've analysed her enough for now.

[ashlesha]

I wanna rule out my own type because the screenshots are gruesome in their sparkle and fluff but I don't wanna watch

[Aster]

Kind of wonder if people don’t just associate her disney-esque aesthetics with si/ne.

Idk I’m unable to watch the videos with volume right now but wtf lol

[xerx]

So I delved a little bit into the bathwater controversy. Jordan Peterson is still the bigger grifter.

[The Reality Denialist]

I think Alpha Si type is clear. She seems more ESE than SEi because she is actively doing Si.

Anyway, she is highly welcomed change after countless gamma/beta BSDM medieval smashing in the media.

[sbbds]

apparently she put a disclaimer that the bathwater is "not for drinking and should only be used for sentimental purposes”. however, what people actually do then with it is another matter.

I see. Still gross af and not Si at all, or very distorted Si. Saliva and dirty water for sentimental purposes...

[on a peaceful hiatus]

I think Alpha Si type is clear.

how do you explain her mystical dream like home? her open display of sexual topics (which you can almost never see in alpha types)? SEI seems like such an odd typing for her. makes me shake my head tbh.

[on a peaceful hiatus]

watch this video from 8:45 on and tell me again that she's an SEI...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQscyzNOBNY&t=716s

Hila Klein seems very shocked by it, and we agreed in the H3H3 thread that she's an SEI.

[The Reality Denialist]

watch this video from 8:45 on and tell me again that she's an SEI...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQscyzNOBNY&t=716s

Hila Klein seems very shocked by it, and we agreed in the H3H3 thread that she's an SEI.

I'll watch but I typed her ESE.

OK her sexuality is more implicit rather than explicit hence Si/Ne >Se/Ni.

[on a peaceful hiatus]

I'll watch but I typed her ESE.

OK her sexuality is more implicit rather than explicit hence Si/Ne >Se/Ni.

https://www.instagram.com/p/Bvg7LvYhEbR/?hl=de

[The Reality Denialist]

Yeah pretty much very implying style. Nothing is said very directly.

[ashlesha]

She's just eating a banana, nothing explicit about that. Pervert.

Jk

She is very cute, banana or not.

[on a peaceful hiatus]

She's just eating a banana, nothing explicit about that. Pervert.

Jk

She is very cute, banana or not.

hey let me have fun. she's supposedly my dual

[The Reality Denialist]

Am I the only one who has met ESE's who were pretty much climbing on the walls while giggling?

[WinnieW]

She's just eating a banana, nothing explicit about that. Pervert.

Ok, then I'm probably Pervert #2

The gesture she shows is lascivious. If you don't recognize it you're likely as moral as an angel.
It's when a cigar isn't just a cigar, to cite good old Sigi F.

I don't know for sure, but I guess what we see in her videos is a Youtube act. I value cosplay as a spare time activity only.
And a few people already successfully did what she wants you to do: To watch her videos. Many clicks, much $ for her.

If it's her real life persona, I'd say: Get mature, woman.

...and the server this board runs on is as slow as in the past... I'm not amused.

[bohemienne]

I've never heard of her before this, but I just went and watched her YouTube videos. Am I crazy to think she could be EII? She has this eccentric, maybe even bizarre aesthetic that I usually associate with intuitive types. I suppose she could be SEI.

I don't see ESI, whatever she might be.