"Inasmuch as it is nothing but pure communicability, every face, even the most noble and beautiful, is always suspended on the edge of an abyss"
she's very much Se, to me, using her body to sell.. quite the prototype of a gamma SF (I think she's ESI-Se)
how does she do it
I thought that her behaviour could be linked to Si as vulnerable or surpressed ignoring function, which is linked to sexuality, meaning that types with weak Si (LIE, EIE, SEE and SLE) often display their sexuality openly, or are even prone to perversion, or they have an unhealthy or unorthodox approach to sexuality. I think it applies to belle delphine. from my own observation and various socionics sources it seems that SEE is the type that is most inclined to prostitution, but belle delphine seems to also be a rather strategic and creative person, making me lean more towards EIE (who have Ne as 4 dimensional function). just my 2 cents.
no way she's a N, she's just too confident in her own body, makes great use of it, to be a N
Plenty of Si doms and non-Se egos do sex work. There are quite a few SEI prostitutes and porn stars especially.
Se is about power, dominance, money, body aesthetics; Si is about comfort, caring, body pleasure, body needs.
no doubts she's oriented toward the first.
if you can't perceive the violence in her gestures idk what to tell you, perhaps you don't mind it and therefore, no Si valuer.
another thing I considered is that she never really completely sells herself. meaning she doesn't do nudes. you could argue that it's a marketing strategy to keep people interested in her, but SEE usually have a very direct approach to their sexuality, while belle delphine tries to keep mysterious and probably cares a lot about her image. that' anothet point that made me lean towards EIE.
like I said, I don't know much about her personal life and it could probably help with the typing.
"There are quite a few SEI prostitutes and porn stars especially."
I doubt that. of course, porn is a huge business and you might find any type there, but saying that there are a lot of SEI prostitutes seems like a stretch.
"hag is the elizabeth bathory of t16t" – Luminous Lynx
She's also terrible. I'm not mad at her business hustle, tho--people pay big money for a lot of dumb, seemingly useless shit (that obviously has some degree of value for them); tale as old as time.
SEis are driven to positive aesthetic experiences and all of her activities (bathing, reading books, cooking, eating, playing boring ass games, brushing her teeth) point to a physically relaxed focus on the steady, methodical, flow of the moment as if attempting to achieve optimal internal homeostasis and balance with the external world [Si]; she focuses a lot on "going through the (physical) motions," creatively executed in a way that imparts some emotional resonance (desire, lust) to her intended audience [Fe], that is ordered, structured and categorized by some internal framework that probably makes sense to her even if it doesn't to anyone else [Ti]--she essentially has the same formula that she routinely carries out, and sprinkled with bits of whimsy and novelty [Ne] that is clearly sublimated to her overarching Si program.
B) The matter of whether S is connected to sexuality aside, her sexuality is not 'open' in the way you describe. Her entire sexuality is about an impression as an innocent child. She tailors her clothing -- which is less revealing and form-fitting than a typical sex worker's -- and environment to give this holistic sort of impression rather than making use of blunt sexuality and sensuousness itself. She is clearly not an Se ego.
Also consider her relaxed demeanor. She isn't naturally busy; relaxment and comfort is her natural mode of being, as is common with Si valuers (i.e. the Judicious/Decisive dichotomy). This attitude is strengthened proportionally to Si's valuation. Her entire videos, where she's in her home, she's relaxed, not stressed, and, though active, never truly busy -- sometimes doing light, pleasurable 'work', like cooking, which she probably enjoys a great deal. Compare an SEE's attitude toward getting stuff done.
we been know
"hag is the elizabeth bathory of t16t" – Luminous Lynx
only extroverts get blowjobs lol
and intros skullz broken, aye
It's interesting how much faith people put in descriptions. Reality isn't so black or white. There's a lot of overlapping.
If a type description, of SEI in this case, keeps from mentioning something about the type, it's just to accentuate an artificial distinction from one other type, so as to simplify things. Just like if someone said black people only do rap or soul music, it's just an oversimplification, made in an attempt at clarity.
you don't get body comfort with money lol, wtf
of course everybody cares about money to some extent, if you're ready to sell your ass to get it, though, that's quite a stretch of how much you value money (a lot) and your own well being (not a lot)
If you picture any kinda introverted slut (is that word offensive?), she's probably SEI.
Edit: there are different kinds of sluts of course so to clarify, IEIs are sluts to manipulate the men they sleep with, ESIs fall in lust with different men, one at a time, and SEIs are the school sluts who suck guys' dicks in the bathroom for the sheer pleasure and fun of it.
Last edited by FreelancePoliceman; 08-01-2019 at 07:06 PM.
all props to typing smn with "she looks cute/disgusting" or "I like her/I don't like her", aye
Anyway, it's probably pointless to argue about her type, but all I'm saying is to go watch some porn and play spot the SEI. It's really strange to me you think Si types are averse to sex work. SEIs are one of the most common types in it.
There are also a lot of SEI men in porn now that I think of it. Especially in porn geared more toward women. Passionate, sensual, usually nice, etc., usually focusing on his partner's pleasure.
I've never seen you formulate an elaborate, independent, original thought in any of your posts. You just vomitate what descriptions say like a tape recorder, never doubting or questioning them, it's like you're a Socionics vending machine.
I speak from experience. I spent a considerable amount of time asking people to type themselves, and a lot of them didn't resemble totally what written in their type descriptions, even though the function order was correct. You instead continue to look at descriptions like Moses at his tablets, like something immutable and eternally true.
The entire Socionics is a theory, theories leave always something to be improved. Yes, the earth isn't flat.
lol @ thinking that male pornstar focus on their partner's pleasures
Also, I like how everytime soundconfusion feels he can't win an argument, he always says he prefer to end the discussion.