Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Socionics Type and Teaching Style

  1. #1
    Chakram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    304
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default Socionics Type and Teaching Style

    What patterns have you noticed regarding a person's socionic type and their manner of teaching others?

    Specify the type of teaching environment with your examples and thoughts; include whether they were teaching you or others for a job, in a class, for random knowledge impartment, etc.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    11,346
    Mentioned
    1044 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    base T types give good structured and clear explanations and descriptions. being also base T I like this, it's easier to study for me
    lectures of LSIs tutors were best in uni from the point to understand technical themes. I remember 3 such tutors. also they all were harder on exams

    the style of base N may look as chaotic for me
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  3. #3
    a two horned unicorn renegade COVID 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    At the korona table
    TIM
    ILE-C-I
    Posts
    5,157
    Mentioned
    227 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I prefer synthetic style especially when random mental images start to form and I see the process in my mind's eye. When people give imagination extinguishing ways for operation the point seems to be largely sacrificed for trivialities.

    Anyway, I have encountered many different ways and I just have to do the work for myself if it is totally incompatible.
    Measuring you right now

    Winning is for losers

  4. #4
    Impermanence para's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    1,012
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nihilist 007 View Post
    I prefer synthetic style especially when random mental images start to form and I see the process in my mind's eye. When people give imagination extinguishing ways for operation the point seems to be largely sacrificed for trivialities.

    Anyway, I have encountered many different ways and I just have to do the work for myself if it is totally incompatible.
    I seem to respond the same way - amalgamation of imagery forming a synthetic whole or ''monad'' of information, inseparable. I actually have difficulties following the ''parts'' of some systematics, but have an easy time grasping abstractions that only have few parts. Imaginary faculties work best with unity i suppose.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •