Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 54

Thread: Fe-Valuing: Anyone Else Notice This?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,309
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Fe-Valuing: Anyone Else Notice This?

    For me, as someone Fe-valuing, the 'laughing gas' is turned on like crazy on the inside: almost any joke - really anything funny - makes me laugh. I can't help but wonder if it bothers Fi-valuing types. Anyone else have this or notice this?

  2. #2
    pinkcanary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    TIM
    SEI-Si 648 sp/sx
    Posts
    272
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm a laughing maniac too.

  3. #3
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,235
    Mentioned
    335 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pinkcanary View Post
    I'm a laughing maniac too.
    I don't have to. I'm already a maniac. Or am I?

    maniac

    • n.
      A psychotic or otherwise mentally ill person who exhibits violent or bizarre behavior. Not used in psychiatric diagnosis.
    • n.
      A person who has an excessive enthusiasm or desire for something.
    • n.
      A person who acts in a wildly irresponsible way.

    Yep.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  4. #4
    rizz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    LT
    Posts
    1,423
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Lol

  5. #5
    Bento's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    281
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Sometimes Fe-egos laugh even when my jokes are stupid so I don't feel bad about myself. Thanks, Fe-types.

  6. #6
    Dauphin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    North Carolina
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    946
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jason_m View Post
    For me, as someone Fe-valuing, the 'laughing gas' is turned on like crazy on the inside: almost any joke - really anything funny - makes me laugh. I can't help but wonder if it bothers Fi-valuing types. Anyone else have this or notice this?
    that seems like much more of an Alpha SF thing. My mother's an ESE and laughs at every joke other people make in conversation, and last year I had an ESE girl in one of my classes who would laugh at almost everything. It's rather annoying to me.
    As an EIE, most of the time I'll give a small "polite laugh" or smile and exhale out of my nose a bit. Actual laughing is relatively infrequent for me.

  7. #7
    mindless Aeris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    nowhere important
    TIM
    heartless
    Posts
    481
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I grew up hearing about the benefit of laughter, how wonderful it is for health, how people who don't laugh a million times a day are sorry hallow husks of human shells. I grew the habbit of laughing a lot, making stupid jokes I find useless waste of breath which made me feel dead inside, what a joke. I hate laughing, still better to play along around certain people.
    I remember having a one hour class of therapy laughter in primary school. Horrifying.
    Laughing out loud is a cultural thing around here, or at least it seems like it to me.

  8. #8
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,263
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jason_m View Post
    For me, as someone Fe-valuing, the 'laughing gas' is turned on like crazy on the inside: almost any joke - really anything funny - makes me laugh. I can't help but wonder if it bothers Fi-valuing types. Anyone else have this or notice this?
    As someone who has been ordered to laugh before, yes.

  9. #9
    c esi-se 6w7 spsx ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the center of the universe
    Posts
    15,833
    Mentioned
    912 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    If this is a thing, I guess I haven't noticed enough for it to bother me. It seems like a luxurious thing to get in a twist over?

    I rarely laugh but I love the feeling of being inspired to laugh a lot, which happens maybe a couple times a year.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    one of IEE I know liked to laugh loud. liked to remember humour situations from the life

  11. #11
    Moderator myresearch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    2,043
    Mentioned
    199 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yes, it is not so easy to turn on the laughing gas but when it is turned on, it stays turned on. I am not sure if it is solely about Fe. I know some delta STs who have this similar trait. So I think it is not about Fe valuing, maybe it is about low Fe or Fx.

    I think when people genuinely start to laugh, they keep on laughing. I think that's why there are funny video compilations, even if you don't laugh for a while, after watching the video for a while, you start to laugh and then keep on laughing, not because those parts are more funny but because the laughing gas is turned on. I think it is a human trait. However, strong F types may have better control over the button of their laughing gas.

    Yet again, ofcourse some types can find their laughing gas turned on more frequently than others and/or some types would be more willingly to turn it on.

  12. #12
    Revelations's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Connecticut
    TIM
    Gamma SF. E2 sx/so
    Posts
    73
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Oh, I do laugh at every joke. But that's because I'm lucky enough to find them all funny. Fake laughter? I wish I could sometimes. Just to cover someone up like Bento said..

  13. #13
    Dauphin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    North Carolina
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    946
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Perhaps it's not actually type related. I can see how Alphas and Deltas can laugh more often but I'm not sure exactly what exactly might cause that, other than both quadras coming off as "happier" in a vague sense.

  14. #14
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,475
    Mentioned
    332 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I am easily amused - I can find humor in almost anything.

  15. #15
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm often criticized for having a dead pan face, SEEs especially criticize me for not laughing when they make idiotic jokes "oh! you could smile once in your lifetime!" no, fuck u

  16. #16
    Marep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    TIM
    EII Sx/Sp 9w1 (954)
    Posts
    599
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    I'm often criticized for having a dead pan face, SEEs especially criticize me for not laughing when they make idiotic jokes "oh! you could smile once in your lifetime!" no, fuck u
    Sounds more like what an ESE would do, honestly.
    If they really are SEEs, then they would do the same with ESIs (which is a type I consider even more serious than EII).

  17. #17
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,475
    Mentioned
    332 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marep View Post
    Sounds more like what an ESE would do, honestly.
    If they really are SEEs, then they would do the same with ESIs (which is a type I consider even more serious than EII).
    I agree that this sounds much more like an Fe valuer. Could be SLE or something, but SEE is less likely. They'd have trouble getting along with Fe-4 types if they did that.

  18. #18
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    I agree that this sounds much more like an Fe valuer. Could be SLE or something, but SEE is less likely. They'd have trouble getting along with Fe-4 types if they did that.
    Fe-4 types? you mean ExE and xEE? or Fe-1 LxI and xLI? how does that make sense?

    and since when is Fe about imposition and personal rank?


  19. #19
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,475
    Mentioned
    332 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    Fe-4 types? you mean ExE and xEE? or Fe-1 LxI and xLI? how does that make sense?

    and since when is Fe about imposition and personal rank?

    Fe in the 4th function, i.e. Fe vulnerable.

    Wanting someone to smile isn't about personal rank. However Fe can be "imposing" in the sense of trying to change someone's emotional state.

  20. #20

    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    1,024
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Probably something to do with ethics and extraversion, if one HAD to make categorical observations.

  21. #21
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ok, but no I don't think they are ESEs. I know it's weird, especially considering their duals are ILIs, but that's it. ESI instead are more at ease in social situations and can easily engage in "proper" behaviors

  22. #22

    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    1,024
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    ok, but no I don't think they are ESEs. I know it's weird, especially considering their duals are ILIs, but that's it. ESI instead are more at ease in social situations and can easily engage in "proper" behaviors
    I've read somewhere that SEE does this ''automatic'' prodding, as to search for a dual to coax out of the shell. I think it's just Se.

  23. #23
    FreelancePoliceman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    5,701
    Mentioned
    524 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I did that when really young. I’d sometimes just think of a joke and laugh so hard I’d have trouble breathing. When I was 11 or so I obsessively read cracked.com and sites like it, and I thought it was the best thing in the world. I also watched comedians on Youtube a lot. I laughed to almost every sentence I read or heard.

    I like to think my sense of humor is more refined now, but I’ve noticed when interacting with my girlfriend that I have a constant compulsion to make jokes and use humor, especially when she’s upset, and this is pretty difficult to consciously control — e.g. if she asks me to be serious, it feels very difficult to prevent myself from making a cheap joke (I’m not defending this behavior, just explaining it). Also, the more comofortable I feel with someone, the more impulse I have to push their buttons, so to speak: that is, I don’t mean to irritate them, but to use absurd humor that subverts expectations, because I want to see them weirded out — the impression and shudder people give when their sense of normalcy and reality is challenged. I get an enormous kick out of it.

    I once, without really thinking of it, convinced my girlfriend that jackalopes were a real animal, because it made me endlessly amused to see her rewriting her view of reality to accomodate jackalopes. But it was an asshole thing to do, so I felt bad and apologized a couple days later.

  24. #24
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    EII typed by Gulenko
    Posts
    4,671
    Mentioned
    339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah, there are some people who *want* to have more fucked up darkness in their lives, and can’t appreciate that others want to relish the bits of joy and dopamine that pop up in this often otherwise disturbed, dark world... The laughter ruins their quality of life.

  25. #25
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^precisely

    ESEs don't command people to laugh, they have no Se, SEEs just do that to establish a form of hierarchy, and even this prodding is meant to be fun for them... guess it comes natural having ILIs as duals

  26. #26
    Alonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    TIM
    SLE-C; E864 SX-SO
    Posts
    1,088
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    ^precisely

    ESEs don't command people to laugh, they have no Se, SEEs just do that to establish a form of hierarchy, and even this prodding is meant to be fun for them... guess it comes natural having ILIs as duals
    Actually, ESEs have strong 4D Se, similarly to how their SEE quasi-identicals have 4D Fe. And ESEs utilize Fe to regulate and modulate the mood of the environment; if you're fucking up the ambient vibes with whatever you're feeling, they'd certainly possess the wherewithal to "nudge" you in whichever direction they saw as more favorable/conducive to the overall mood.

  27. #27
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    tell me smt i dont know

    "having no Se" means to not have it in the ego, nor valued. ESEs deal with Si, it forbids them to push people into wtv is the mood of the environment, else they would alienate their duals, who'd join the environment only if really interested in it, and not out of a threat (Se polr). Se push can be delivered in many ways, using it to establish a power hierarchy is not Si valuing.

  28. #28
    Alonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    TIM
    SLE-C; E864 SX-SO
    Posts
    1,088
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    tell me smt i dont know

    "having no Se" means to not have it in the ego, nor valued. ESEs deal with Si, it forbids them to push people into wtv is the mood of the environment, else they would alienate their duals, who'd join the environment only if really interested in it, and not out of a threat (Se polr). Se push can be delivered in many ways, using it to establish a power hierarchy is not Si valuing.
    Something you clearly don't know is that one's diction matters as far as being intelligible and properly understood. For example, when you say "no Se," it sounds as if you're invoking MBTI phraseology, and MBTI as a system comes with different concepts, theories and paradigms. Also, to say that Si "forbids" ESEs to "push people" is also problematic; to "forbid" means to make something/some action impossible and seeing as how theoretically there are 7 other functions that to some degree play a role in the psyche and how ESEs have 4D demonstrative Se (where 'the individual is able to be convincingly commanding, tough, challenging, or confrontational for brief periods of time without taking himself too seriously, as a sort of show or game'), obviously Se does actually play a part and serve some purpose, and so using the word "forbid" goes too far.

    Lastly, in a lighthearted social situation where ESE briefly became a bit intense and confrontational, an LII would not be utterly put off because they'd more than likely be able to cognitively discern the "lack of seriousness" involved with an occasional, demonstrative "flair up" of a function that is usually not a recurring, important aspect of their duality. You aren't LII, and so flexing Se around you wouldn't be an issue. As I've mentioned to you once or twice before, in certain scenarios, benefactors can be perceived as douchebags that demonstratively do "too much" from the perspective of their beneficiaries.

  29. #29
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alonzo View Post
    Something you clearly don't know is that one's diction matters as far as being intelligible and properly understood. For example, when you say "no Se," it sounds as if you're invoking MBTI phraseology, and MBTI as a system comes with different concepts, theories and paradigms. Also, to say that Si "forbids" ESEs to "push people" is also problematic; to "forbid" means to make something/some action impossible and seeing as how theoretically there are 7 other functions that to some degree play a role in the psyche and how ESEs have 4D demonstrative Se (where 'the individual is able to be convincingly commanding, tough, challenging, or confrontational for brief periods of time without taking himself too seriously, as a sort of show or game'), obviously Se does actually play a part and serve some purpose, and so using the word "forbid" goes too far.

    Lastly, in a lighthearted social situation where ESE briefly became a bit intense and confrontational, an LII would not be utterly put off because they'd more than likely be able to cognitively discern the "lack of seriousness" involved with an occasional, demonstrative "flair up" of a function that is usually not a recurring, important aspect of their duality. You aren't LII, and so flexing Se around you wouldn't be an issue. As I've mentioned to you once or twice before, in certain scenarios, benefactors can be perceived as douchebags that demonstratively do "too much" from the perspective of their beneficiaries.
    if you knew the difference between valued and unvalued functions you'd know why forbid fits in this context.

    and since you wanna be anal about it, no Se doesn't manifest the same way in quasis, or they'd be identical. the role of Si is exactly there to forbid Se take the lead. yes, Se is delivered, but since Si is valued, Se doesn't play the role that it does in SEEs, which is, again, a social manifestation of power, as in " laugh at my dumb jokes goddamn"

  30. #30
    Alonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    TIM
    SLE-C; E864 SX-SO
    Posts
    1,088
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    if you knew the difference between valued and unvalued functions you'd know why forbid fits in this context.

    and since you wanna be anal about it, no Se doesn't manifest the same way in quasis, or they'd be identical. the role of Si is exactly there to forbid Se take the lead. yes, Se is delivered, but since Si is valued, Se doesn't play the role that it does in SEEs, which is, again, a social manifestation of power, as in " laugh at my dumb jokes goddamn"
    1.) lol Ummm, no. I know the difference between valued and subdued functions; but if you knew the difference between "forbid" and more appropriate words like subdue/limit/suppress, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

    2.) Nowhere did I say or imply that Se plays the same role in ESEs as it does in SEEs; I've actually gone out of my way to mention ESE's demonstrative Se usage, which usually occurs under niche, specific circumstances befitting its IE. I'm not the one here who doesn't know how to properly convey nuance.

  31. #31
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alonzo View Post
    1.) lol Ummm, no. I know the difference between valued and subdued functions; but if you knew the difference between "forbid" and more appropriate words like subdue/limit/suppress, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

    2.) Nowhere did I say or imply that Se plays the same role in ESEs as it does in SEEs; I've actually gone out of my way to mention ESE's demonstrative Se usage, which usually occurs under niche, specific circumstances befitting its IE. I'm not the one here who doesn't know how to properly convey nuance.
    1) they're not called subdued, they're called unvalued. forbid indicates how something can't happen because of a threshold, which is the case here.

    2) which is why you agreed on the comment about how a SEE behavior was characteristic of ESEs, makes sense.

  32. #32
    Dalek Caan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    196
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sbbds View Post
    Yeah, there are some people who *want* to have more fucked up darkness in their lives, and can’t appreciate that others want to relish the bits of joy and dopamine that pop up in this often otherwise disturbed, dark world... The laughter ruins their quality of life.
    So true story. I used to work with an SLE and if I was in a bad mood, he'd expect me to be act congenial and it would irritate me and I'd disengage more. I think from his perspective, I was wallowing in being depressed or something. Socionics works people. Different strokes.

    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    ^precisely

    ESEs don't command people to laugh, they have no Se, SEEs just do that to establish a form of hierarchy, and even this prodding is meant to be fun for them... guess it comes natural having ILIs as duals
    🤨
    Androgynous Robot Dreamer - Not really human, but good at pretending.

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    blame the merry quadras

  33. #33
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    EII typed by Gulenko
    Posts
    4,671
    Mentioned
    339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dalek Caan View Post
    So true story. I used to work with an SLE and if I was in a bad mood, he'd expect me to be act congenial and it would irritate me and I'd disengage more. I think from his perspective, I was wallowing in being depressed or something. Socionics works people. Different strokes.



    I didn’t say anything about trying to change others’ behaviour. I described other people coming along and acting on passive people being happy, which is the opposite of this. If you’re going out of your way to tell me this just because of my sociotype in spite of what I really said, I’ll take the wild guess to say you’re probably just a dick and deserved it.

  34. #34
    Dalek Caan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    196
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sbbds View Post
    I didn’t say anything about trying to change others’ behaviour. I described other people coming along and acting on passive people being happy, which is the opposite of this. If you’re going out of your way to tell me this just because of my sociotype in spite of what I really said, I’ll take the wild guess to say you’re probably just a dick and deserved it.
    ahh, my bad, I wasn't implying anything bad about what you said. I just wanted to relay an experience between me and an SLE and I thought it related to what you said. And think it's cool to see these connections, so maybe I was a little too zealous in responding. Really just trying to give an example of how an SLE could view me that way and how it related to my experience...

    damn, maybe it's time I take a break from the forum.
    Androgynous Robot Dreamer - Not really human, but good at pretending.

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    blame the merry quadras

  35. #35
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    EII typed by Gulenko
    Posts
    4,671
    Mentioned
    339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dalek Caan View Post
    ahh, my bad, I wasn't implying anything bad about what you said. I just wanted to relay an experience between me and an SLE and I thought it related to what you said. And think it's cool to see these connections, so maybe I was a little too zealous in responding. Really just trying to give an example of how an SLE could view me that way and how it related to my experience...

    damn, maybe it's time I take a break from the forum.
    Protip 1: Come up to people with something negative (that could relate to them) and you’re bound to get a negative response. How old are you?

    Protip 2: Tell an SLE bothering you to fuck off, problem solved. We usually don’t want to be around people who don’t want to be around us.

    See you later.

  36. #36
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    oh well same thing then

    obviously I meant that if you value Si, you won't use Se to convey the same amount of info of a Se valuer, Si forbids that be the case, along with all the other functions in all their nice places.

    Quote Originally Posted by Alonzo View Post
    How do you still not understand that everyone is capable of everything? That's basic, fundamental, rudimentary shit. Again, just because you push back and say whatever nonsense, does not make it so. It's best to just shut up and not make yourself look more foolish than you already do.
    and you're saying that after you agreed on a comment about how a specific SEE behavior was instead typical of another type... aha, lol

  37. #37
    Alonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    TIM
    SLE-C; E864 SX-SO
    Posts
    1,088
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    oh well same thing then

    obviously I meant that if you value Si, you won't use Se to convey the same amount of info of a Se valuer, Si forbids that be the case, along with all the other functions in all their nice places.
    1.) Yup, it was the same thing and you said it wasn't, which is why you were wrong.

    2.) Nah, nothing you say can be counted as "obvious"; you're not allowed the luxury of the benefit of the doubt because a lot of the shit you say does not readily make sense. My second post addressed you explicitly on the matter of diction and speaking more clearly/precisely. Had you initially included (which you did not) that bit about ESEs not using Se to "convey the same amount of info" (which is accurate) as opposed to your assertion that Si "forbids them to push people into wtv is the mood of the environment, else they would alienate their duals," (which is inaccurate), then the conversation would have taken another turn.

    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    and you're saying that after you agreed on a comment about how a specific SEE behavior was instead typical of another type... aha, lol
    You still haven't grasped the notion of a qualifier, huh? Marep said that it sounds "MORE like what a ESE would do," and yes, I agreed with that. "More" ≠ "instead"; it's not a black or white, all or nothing term--it speaks to a gradient. I said nothing false or untrue > I do think that the behavior you mentioned is more typical of ESEs even though both ESEs and SEEs are capable of the behavior (i.e., "everyone is capable of everything"). Save your "ahas" for someone you can actually best.

  38. #38
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    1) none calls them subdued, but wtv, just proving my point:

    2) u bring up the subdued functions and don't even know what the term implies; if something is subdued something else is submitting it, basic logic 101.

    Mr qualifier that can't get basic linguistic shades, Marep's post was contradicting what I said, reinforced by stating that the people I mentioned couldn't be SEE; you've then further made the same point when saying that ESEs can behave wtv way it fits the environment (wrong, because Si). so you either agreed on something which is false, or you're just making a fuss out of your own ass, as usual.

    Quote Originally Posted by Alonzo View Post
    Subdue ≠ Forbid
    your ignorance is really of no help, so either you change your attitude, or you can fuck the hell off.

  39. #39
    Alonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    TIM
    SLE-C; E864 SX-SO
    Posts
    1,088
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Were your parents low IQ siblings that Muay Thai kick boxed while smoking crack and meth in an asbestos laced tenement underneath active power lines and across the street from a polluted water source? Because I’m desperately trying to account for how someone could be so outrageously stupid.

    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    1) none calls them subdued, but wtv, just proving my point:
    The source you quoted calls them "subdued", you fucking moron >

    Subdued functions are the remaining four functions that oppose our preferences; as a result we try to limit the use of these functions. The mental-subdued (weak) functions are found in the Super-ego block (functions 3 and 4), and the vital-subdued (strong) functions are in the Id block (functions 7 and 8). Since these functions are what we suppress as much as we can, in situations where we must use them they tend to produce dissatisfaction and distress in ourselves. Subdued functions are sometimes called non-valued although some socionists prefer not to use this name.
    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    2) u bring up the subdued functions and don't even know what the term implies; if something is subdued something else is submitting it, basic logic 101.
    How the fuck do you get up in the morning without immediately collapsing? Because there's evidently next to nothing functioning properly in that empty shallow husk sitting atop your neck. This whole time I've been arguing about your inadequate and inaccurate word choice. How the fuck are you going to attempt to rewrite history when evidence to the contrary is only a few posts above? lol Amazing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Alonzo View Post
    Something you clearly don't know is that one's diction matters as far as being intelligible and properly understood. For example, when you say "no Se," it sounds as if you're invoking MBTI phraseology, and MBTI as a system comes with different concepts, theories and paradigms. Also, to say that Si "forbids" ESEs to "push people" is also problematic; to "forbid" means to make something/some action impossible and seeing as how theoretically there are 7 other functions that to some degree play a role in the psyche and how ESEs have 4D demonstrative Se (where 'the individual is able to be convincingly commanding, tough, challenging, or confrontational for brief periods of time without taking himself too seriously, as a sort of show or game'), obviously Se does actually play a part and serve some purpose, and so using the word "forbid" goes too far.
    Quote Originally Posted by Alonzo View Post
    1.) lol Ummm, no. I know the difference between valued and subdued functions; but if you knew the difference between "forbid" and more appropriate words like subdue/limit/suppress, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
    Quote Originally Posted by Alonzo View Post
    Subdued functions are those that oppose our preferred functions and they are sometimes referred to as non-valued/unvalued functions; and so, again, you are wrong. And your usage of the word "forbid" was still inaccurate; Si limits Se's expression but in so much as ESEs are still capable of utilizing Se (and with 4D strength), then it can't be "forbidden"--clearly then, there is a Si "threshold" that can be surpassed, even if it's not a usual, customary or particularly comfortable occurrence.
    I'm not the one who is confused here.

    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    Mr qualifier that can't get basic linguistic shades, Marep's post was contradicting what I said, reinforced by stating that the people I mentioned couldn't be SEE; you've then further made the same point when saying that ESEs can behave wtv way it fits the environment (wrong, because Si). so you either agreed on something which is false, or you're just making a fuss out of your own ass, as usual.
    =j"#¤&853nåöädukfn3729eöpöäåöli

    Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
    your ignorance is really of no help, so either you change your attitude, or you can fuck the hell off.
    Or you could nose dive from the highest point on a bridge, hit the water, wildly flail about and deeply inhale as much as possible. You are a societal drain--less you, more oxygen for those who deserve it.

  40. #40
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alonzo View Post

    =j"#¤&853nåöädukfn3729eöpöäåöli
    translation: I have no points so look at me use my trite insults to win a discussion

    yeah, no need you repeat that, you're embarrassing yourself.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •