VI gallery
Nice, terrible typings
Einstein as EII??
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I still have doubts in fish's type as EII
videobloggers are better for examples
oh wow some of these certainly are... odd.Originally Posted by hayla55
I don't get the animal pics but they're funny enough for me to not be bothered.
seriously?
Napoleon is the type portrait of SEE in russian theory, why LII?
The weird thing is that I agree with some but... seeing Napoleon as LII and Gaiman as LSI is the equivalent of typing me SLE-Se to be fair
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
the only word that can describe a site claiming that Alexander the Great and Renee Zelwegger are the same Socionics Type is, as follows:
GARBAGE
And that's what www.pinterest.com/sociotypes amounts to in terms of quality: garbage.
I could go on and on pointing out the ridiculous typings and the total lack of coherence but that one just about sums it up. These groupings are ludicrous and no amount of logic, intelligence, common sense or facts can make these groupings work. I've rarely seen worse.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote