LII? Or something else?
Such a likable woman
creative sub seems clear
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lqmZcVYlzg4
Kaija Saariaho - composer
LII? Or something else?
Such a likable woman
creative sub seems clear
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lqmZcVYlzg4
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
mb LSI
Kaija Saariaho - INFJ - Dostoyevsky
She truly sounds like process type to the max. I think LSI might make a lot of sense. Her thoroughness throughout her procedure is very LSI like quality. She almost makes her creative process bureaucratic.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
I was just thinking the same here as khcs. That she might be EII after all. C-EII is a very resonable typing for her.
I can't really see LSI. But it's an interesting typing considering they are super egos.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
based on your video alone I would say LSI. I also think that she's a normalising subtype.Originally Posted by Tallmo
Hmmm, N-LSIs are quite common, but I've never met anyone who reminds me of her.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Actually, now when I watched this interview, I can suddenly see LSI
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I need you to help me. What exactly did she say that made you think "yeah 120% type"?
Meticulous methods and wants some drama. The last made drop ILI as an option.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Interesting, so possibly N-LSI. I agree with soundofconfusion that maybe C was wrong. I somehow assumed it. But she kinof seems C at times.
Her music is pretty dark and dramatic:
Trans (2015):
Nymphea Reflecion (2001):
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Err... I made a typo. I'm sorry. What exactly made you say "yeah, 120% process type"?
Process types at least in Gulenko's terms are not fast people. They dwell on things long time and lots of times they have certain procedure.
I think she does not fit in Gulenko's creative LSI profile (it has such words as rescuer and good at courtship).
I need to dig up it from somewhere.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote