My Recommended Introduction.
Hello, the16types.info members!
Good to be here. This is the introduction the site had recommended I make. I am an ESI in Socionics, and an MBTI ISFP. I look forward to theorizing with you all and developing a better understanding of the psyche!
Moralist
welcome
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Hey
Enjoy the site
Thank you!
Thank you!
sup
----- FarDraft, 2020
@FarDraft
Sup
Hi
How do you know you are ESI?
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
ISFP is SEIOriginally Posted by Moralist
preferences of MBTI are dichotomies in Socionics. they are compatible
No its not, stop being idiotic and attempting to ruin other people on their self typings in socionics through your lack of insight.
ISFP can vary in terms of socionics types
Stop being ignorant
You aren't a logical type
ISFP and ESI is quite common combination
Last edited by Breather; 05-18-2019 at 11:37 PM.
You reject the evident that types are the same in Socionics when in MBT are described by the same traits and identified primarily by same traits, as MBTI preferences compatible with Socionics dichotomies.
When you'll have a reasonable instead of senseless emotions and evident absurd then you'll be interesting, incompetent noob.
You're resorting to name calling whilst rejecting the obvious evidence that MBTI doesn't equal same socionics type
Why don't you conduct a survey?
It'll easily prove my point
There are plenty of IEI's who are ENFJ and ENFP in MBTI for example, there are plenty of LSE's who are ISTJs and ESTPs etc
Any combo is possible between mbti and socionics , it's not definitive mbti type = socionics like you would have to lack depth in one of the theories to come up with a shallow conclusion like that.
This is one example that has been conducted
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
