She's SEI or IEI
She's SEI or IEI
1.) Hilarious that you have the unmitigated gall to tell me to "observe better" and yet you evidently struggle with cataracts your damned self:
2.) Aren't you the same (evidently) face blind autist that thought he must be a IEI because he allegedly favors Colin Farrell (who does happen to be IEI), when in actuality, to those who can actually see (with the corresponding mirror neurons), they do not favor each other. lol If that's what passes for your "observation" skills, then I'll have no parts of them. Besides that, you've yet to put forth anything about him that would substantively indicate a Ni lead. And do you know why? Because he doesn't show much Ni, if at all, in his posts. Why, again you ask? Because he's a SEI.
Talk about subpar "Ni". FOH.
Perhaps it is that I not see with my eyes...
ok cool @Megatrop, say thanks to your sis for enduring to do all the tests lol
I wouldn't doubt the results of these tests, girl can actually be a LII-Ne, if you're sure she's an introvert and say she behaves so warm only with close people, that's a possibility. By functions, it makes more sense that she's a LII than an ILE, because her Te is not strong, while the demonstrative function should rank as high as our base or creative.. so LII makes sense, with Ni as demonstrative.
I agree with Adam that you guys looked so much IEE and SLI, but my ILE dad too can be mistyped for a F(eeler), and he does too dress neat and always with taste... so I can see why people are opting for Si.
Unfortunately the fact that you're talking Portuguese can't tell us much more about the functions you 2 are using, so I think we can rely on these tests.
If you want to add be a bit more of sadism to this, hand her the sociotype.com test, it's easier compared to the ones she did before ... but I think the result can already be confirmed. Thanks for your time!
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ation-Elements), but I don't write like Si-egos either. However my writing is pretty much of Ne-ego as you can verify in my posts and compare to that website. Also, Sol thinks I'm Ne-ego, so when he says dumb, he's probably refering to Ne-dumbness if that makes sense to you. So analyzing my writing, one would be led to Ne instead of Si, that's still intuition
Last edited by Megatrop; 05-05-2019 at 01:12 AM.
Ok, I got ENFP on the test indicated by ooo. But I identify like 85% with EII-Ne (not with ENFP), and almost 100% with IEI-Fe, except for the extroverted part. So EII-Ne is a good candidate.
2.) Furthermore, everyone uses everything, as in, every function will show up in one's diction and speech patterns at some point; if anything, it's a matter of degree and frequency. Therefore, of course, Ne should theoretically show up in your posts (and SEIs, in particular, are Ne-valuing, btw), but do you know what manifests with far greater strength and frequency? Fi and Fe, which would make sense for a Fe sub type due to the greater dimensionality of those functions. Subsequently, you'd have to possess 3D Si or Ni, which differs in scope to 4D Si or Ni. And guess what? More than you piecing together information, patterns, theories, and metaphors in order to synthesize some broad, big picture insight or point (Ni), I see you recalling specific memories and anecdotes that relate to some past experience (Si) in order to draw a conclusion. Stop fighting it. It really is perfectly fine to be a SEI. If it's important for you to be a "genius" or some "visionary," (both of which seem rather dual seeking to me, fwiw) SEIs are also capable of this, as you've shown via your musical talents, for example.
3.) And no, your (low Ti) rendering of Sol's "point" does not make sense to me, which speaks more to SEI > SLI.
And if that girl is your sister, than it makes even more sense why you believe yourself to be an intuitive. Activation relations can function like a sped up dualization process, which is why they can be draining after a while > there's so much energy and information being transferred on the complimentary information elements of the other party. My mother and a few close relatives are SEEs and when I was growing up, I swore on everything holy that I wanted to be a comic book artist, painter, or some brand of performance artist (acting, singing, dance, martial arts); for a long time I believed my Se and Fi to be stronger and more competent than they actually were, in large part because my subconscious dual seeking functions were being electro-shocked regularly; they had become a more "present" and "aware" part of my consciousness over time (which could be "positive" or "negative," depending on intensity and any resultant "confusion"). It was only after heading off to University and regularly encountering more of my own kind in activities frequented by us where I then thought..."wait a minute...Se+Fi 'things' are great and wonderful and cool and I'll still partake of them, but I feel more internally at ease with Te+Ni related stuff"--that's where I really felt at home.
Something to think about.
@Mega, by those results you can be ENxp, but you should take other tests too, which is fair because your sis did ;p come on boy!
oi, there's a test around, it's very long (but it used to be even longer!) if you don't have anything to do this morning, maybe give it a try? https://www.aimtoknow.com/test_beta
do more tests lol, then let's make a chart
Whatever dude, rock out with your cock out. Be whatever you want to be. "Belief is free"; it's just problematic as fuck when the underpinnings of those beliefs are rooted in untruths and falsehoods. These typing systems can only truly work when the deeper subsystems (read: sociotypes and IR) are acting on the appropriate code. How we get mistypings, that then lead to disillusionment, dissatisfaction and abandonment the system, is from people assigning and ascribing false "values" to traits they don't actually possess, to begin with, which has a ricocheting effect across the system and amplifies the dysfunction. But go on ahead, be a IEI who ducks and dodges Ni abstractions like an aikido master.
I typed you IEE but after your vid I saw you are an introvert. I think you are EII and she could be LII. My best friend is LII.
I think Megatrop might be ILI or EII. It is not unheard of hanging with super egos. Sometimes I find them quite OK.
Measuring you right now
Winning is for losers
It's wrong, totally wrong. SEI's are capable of being highly intelligent. I know plenty of SEI's who are more intelligent than me.
I do think Megatrop might be SEI but I also think the sp 9 may come into effect here for people who are typing, sp 9 intuitives are concrete in general. That's a big misunderstanding of the theory.
I think the girl is EIE
I don't think it's a dual
@Megatrop Every type is great trust me, if you're here to figure out your type in its entirety though then I would suggest hearing out everyone's perspective. You seem like a great guy btw.
I have a hard time understanding why people keep labeling Mega as a S when he clearly doesn't relate to it/ doesn't score as a S/ doesn't do overly S stuff. Intuitive is probably the only certainty that I have about him, along with Introverted. p/j is a bit tricky to pin down... and T/F might be just as tricky too. if sister is really LII, it doesn't look like they're neither "identicals", nor "look-alike". she could be another type though, and if you were the LII... she could be an extroverted instead (?).. LII's too have clear principles and aim to be good people... I can see that in himself... gosh so many variables.. btw INxx is what I'd feel sure about, for now
meanwhile he types all SEI as EII
something about the way they are asked that's different from other mbti tests
there are always problematic ways in which E/I are defined
Yes I'm INFj in both systems and no mbti tests (like I've said a million times before) are not designed to give you a functional result. There is one currently and I took it it said you are INFP but most likely INFJ. Yeah welcome to MBTI
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
2.) What (conscious) Fi lead would say this?
3.) Moreover, besides what he says/claims to be into re: hobbies and interests, can you pinpoint anything in his posting history that would encapsulate an "intuiting" process? I just can't find any intuition in what he actually says and does, which should be distinguished with what he claims to say and do. We need evidence, "receipts" of the intuition. I'm an Ni creative and yet my Ni is on full display throughout this thread. I can not help myself. If he is now a EII (based off of recent test results), where is the creative Ne???
2.) Having said that, a EII would still have strong (unconscious) 3-4D Ni, and I'm not still not seeing any "intuiting" on your part.
3.) In another post, you said that you don't like to think about your values. But what makes a EII a EII is strong, conscious Fi that prompts them, in part, to most definitely ponder/consider/ruminative over/classify/categorize their highly personalized value system. Now that doesn't mean that they shout it to the rooftops and openly declare it everywhere; but they damn sure know how they feel about something/what they believe in.
fair points indeed, but after reading his questionnaire I didn't have the impression "SENSOR", instead I thought he could be an intuitive... I thought he was a S after watching the video in here instead, but I wouldn't type someone based on VI, nor on the impressions they send me~ ~ because I can't read those : )
btw, I'm not sure how to evaluate those things you reported in red... you're right to label them, but there might just be more to the picture which he's not revealing (?)... it's true that a Fi lead should have some values, or at least wouldn't mind thinking of those things... and it's true intuitives can opt for less practical occupations to satisfy their mental wanderings... but lol... I mean, you could be right, but maybe there's some EII out there who wishes to become a billionaire from being an engineer while not thinking much of what would really make them happy inside... lol, it's a possibility we can't discard