Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: An Interesting Work Dynamic

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    ILI/ INTp
    Posts
    30
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default An Interesting Work Dynamic

    Our bosses-
    Fred- LSE
    Joe- SLI

    ME- ILI, Fred's Supervisor, Joe's Look-alike
    Jen- ESE Fred's Look-alike, Joe's Supervisor
    Jordan- IEE Fred's Activity, Joe's Dual

    The other day Fred and Joe were interviewing someone new and the three of us are wondering whether or not one of us is getting fired and if so which.
    Jordan does the least amount of work but is in the best position imo
    Last edited by calm; 04-29-2019 at 04:59 PM.

  2. #2
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North Italy
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,449
    Mentioned
    219 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    you are the beneficiary of Joe not lookalike.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  3. #3
    Smilex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    179
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hmyeah, all the relations are named wrong.

  4. #4
    Smilex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    179
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    gdangit, you're fast with your likes @myresearch

  5. #5
    myresearch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    346
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If you think that you are Joe's look-alike while you are actually beneficiary and you are able to label your own supervision correctly, then Jen is ILE. That means Jen is also your contrary (extinguishment) partner. I assume that you labeled dual relation right and activity wrong, so I guess Jordan is EIE, that makes him Fred's superego partner and Jen's beneficiary and your own supervisor. All of the workers and bosses are process types. I think that you and Jen are probably more comfortable around your bosses, however, Jordan is probably having the best time except the times he spent with Fred.

  6. #6
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,281
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by myresearch View Post
    If you think that you are Joe's look-alike while you are actually beneficiary and you are able to label your own supervision correctly, then Jen is ILE. That means Jen is also your contrary (extinguishment) partner. I assume that you labeled dual relation right and activity wrong, so I guess Jordan is EIE, that makes him Fred's superego partner and Jen's beneficiary and your own supervisor. All of the workers and bosses are process types. I think that you and Jen are probably more comfortable around your bosses, however, Jordan is probably having the best time except the times he spent with Fred.
    When I read the op I thought, hmm, looks like a logic question in need of a solution. Then along comes myrearch to solve it. lol

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung

     



  7. #7

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    ILI/ INTp
    Posts
    30
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I edited my post to include my coworker's types. I didn't realize it wasn't included. Maybe it'll make more sense now. No one was mistyped, I typed them myself, made them take tests, and observed ITR correctly as I've been working here for years. Also, Joe is SLI not LSI

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •