Video Questionaire: Type The Krayfish

[myresearch]

Thank you much for providing an explanation, you make a pretty good point.

Also sorry for the confusion. I was moreso referring to mbti ISTP (which would align "better" with LSI I suppose). I realize mbti and socionics are definitely not equivalents by any means, especially with the definitions of the cognitive functions and information elements differing the way they do, however based upon what I have read so far, IE Ne and CF Ne seem to be very similar in definition and focus, so I thought it would be worth mentioning.

According to model g, we all act like our supervisee when we are in our element. Supervisee's social mission block is supervisor's self-affirmation block, so it make sense that you appear to be LSI(Ti+Si) on some occasions according to model g. (See: https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...VICTOR-GULENKO)

Edit: Based on the content and VI of your video, I don't think that your Ne is invisible. Do you think that your Ne is weak?

[Kray]

According to model g, we all act like our supervisee when we are in our element. Supervisee's social mission block is supervisor's self-affirmation block, so it make sense that you appear to be LSI(Ti+Si) on some occasions according to model g. (See: https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...VICTOR-GULENKO)

Ah ok. I'll have to look into that on my leisure.

Edit: Based on the content and VI of your video, I don't think that your Ne is invisible. Do you think that your Ne is weak?

I'd agree with you, I re-watched it myself and I noted that my body language was pretty typical for how I peg higher Ne users to appear. Perhaps my excessively formal typing style or 6 core sort of lends to the appearance of a lack of Ne? I don't think my Ne is weak, socionics wise it's the function I can probably see myself most in, although I can see the possibility of me subduing it. I've questioned in the past if I were quick/adaptable enough for a ExxP temperament though.