Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
I don't really see why this is necessary. Yes, you do use Ti quite a bit and are interested in a lot of the same areas an LII would be. Yet, you clearly preferred Se in your other video questionnaire. There was no reason to think you value Fe or Si. So the only reason there should be any kind of confusion is if quadra values simply aren't being considered properly.
The main reason I felt it was necessary is because the idea of "valued" isn't clear to me. Is value a conscious thing? Or is it unconscious? I know that ego functions are conscious whereas id functions are unconscious, but it isn't clear to me whether that implies that you use your id functions unconsciously or whether you develop them unconsciously (both could be a possibility). The reason why that's important is because my writing/speech patterns are heavily Ti without my trying. I mean, yes, I do structure my sentences and apply correct grammatical rules, but the vast majority of my speaking/writing is saying what I "feel" sounds right. I don't know if this means I unconsciously value Ti or if I'm just using Ti without valuing it. I think there's a lot of subtlety there that I have to consider.

Another reason for creating another video was that I've had to spend copious amounts of time with who I strongly suspect to be an LSI. While I thought I was Se valuing, her excessive use of Se seems incredibly foolish to me. For example, she works incredibly fast, making many mistakes, but she dislikes going through things slowly and carefully because it's "boring". Secondly, she's very head-strong and immediately conclusive without waiting for more information to be explained. For example, in some of my classes, when a professor makes an assumption without explaining it, she becomes immediately annoyed while my reaction is to wait and see if it's going to be explained. If it isn't, then I'll ask a question. I had a friend in high school who was similar to this, though he made fewer mistakes since he's been trained for a long time to be very detail-oriented.

I find these traits annoying because too many judgements are being made too quickly, meaning that a number of them are likely to be pre-emptive, based on too little information, or down-right false since the user made an error in logic. If the SEE is anything like this, then I can't be certain that they're my dual.

I hope this clears things up.