I don't really see why this is necessary. Yes, you do use Ti quite a bit and are interested in a lot of the same areas an LII would be. Yet, you clearly preferred Se in your other video questionnaire. There was no reason to think you value Fe or Si. So the only reason there should be any kind of confusion is if quadra values simply aren't being considered properly.

Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
Well, @FarDraft, from your user name and your convos in chat and the phrasing of the writing in your posts, you resemble most of the LII's whom I know and none of the ILI's whom I know.

However, you don't look like any of those LII's, but instead rather strongly resemble a couple of the ILI's. Except for the smiling. ILI's don't smile very much.

I actually place a lot of faith in both of these typing methods and I'm puzzled that they so strongly disagree in your case.

It might be time to return to the basics of Socionics and try to determine which functions you prefer to use.
I really wish you would stop doing this. Comparing people to people you know isn't a valid argument, especially when we have no reason to think you're typing those other people correctly in the first place. That and VI (essentially another example of comparison typing) are pretty much your only typing methods. I already gave a comprehensive "basics of socionics" answer in the other thread. (But careful, this method requires actually watching more than 30 seconds of the video.)