The issue I have is that that sounds like the MBTI interpretation of NiTe (contingency planning, mostly) rather than the socionics interpretation. I'm rather certain of being NiTe in MBTI, yet the same can't be said about socionics since neither profile really hones in on planning with respect to type. DarkAngelFireWolf69 talks about it, but model G tries to reconcile MBTI and socionics, which would naturally lend itself to easier typing for someone who knows MBTI in depth. At the high-level, contingency planning would be linked to rationality, though.
Also, I do certainly value intelligence as well as competence. I should have phrased that better in my video. Competence is the ability to complete a task well, which I like since it leads group projects to be much easier. Intelligence is the ability to solve novel problems with little experience (I know it's more complicated, but that's the definition I'll use for now), which I like in others since it allows for a greater ability to converse intellectually. I'll add this as a footnote in the op.
EDIT: My opinions on planning and socionics have changed at this point.



Reply With Quote