@Dionysius The Return
you said: Taylor Swift and those girls are not EIEs, they're all cold and not very expressive. among those girls - the middle one - you thought you saw an IEE, a Fi type. conclusion: you see a person which you consider to be cold and not very expressive, and yet you also consider that person to be a Fi type. this is a contradiction with the dichotomy of ethics, and this was what my response was about.
that is perhaps what you meant, but is not what you said. i agree that EIEs have an emotionality that is more direct and outwardly oriented than IEEs.I meant the mentioned 3 girls are cold and not expressive enough to be EIEs.
intuitiveTaylor Swift is LSI
the middle one is probably a logical type, perhaps ILE.
last one is perhaps an intuitive too, maybe logical maybe not, i don't perceive her as ''cold'', just not smiling.
yep. their restraint is in their relatively greater focus on the subjective emotional situation of others, in shying more away from agitated and potentially rude/unpleasant emotionality. but they are still ethicists and extraverts.Yes, IEEs can be pretty expressive, but even then, there's some Fi restraint to their emotional expression, compared to an EIE.
when you assign to a person an attribute of ''being cold and not expressive'' and from that exclude EIE, but not Fi, then you deny that they are opposites/incongruent with each other in almost all cases. Fi types are as a rule both warm and expressive, and emotional restraint is usually in specific situations where it is demanded (Fe types can do this too, having easy control over their own feelings) or felt as necessary (such as when trying to distance from a person that is disliked), not habitual like with logicians.In a nutshell: the classification of not cold and expressive is an attribute of EIE, and not that "being cold and not expressive" is an attribute of Fi.