Well, it's about my memory of my interaction with you. You write that I intimidated you by askinge details about your sex life. Now, there's a history and context missing from that statement. I don't just walk up to people and ask them right away about their sex lives. Or if something similar happened, than there may already have been a conversation in which you were divulging your sex life. I recall asking for more detail about sthing you posted for sone else, yet I don't remember you directly refusing interaction but ghosting me instead. What stayed with me about you is that you were a very elusive, sneaky person who came forth with a bold statement, then were unwilling to back it up.
I feel that your magnification of this voyeur aspect is to deflect from your exploitation of Enneagram theories for building your social facade online. While it can be impossible that you just didn't feel like answering a stranger, more facts point towards the latter. Facts like you being part of 9 forum groups; then, having your visitor messages and friends page hidden (I'd wager you have a lot, seeing how well you get along with others). These, along with having had various monikers, all suggest that you very consciously lead a very active social life here on 16types. Heck, you may even have multiple accounts.
And your helpfulness may be also for gaining social status. But insider you're very pragmatic, would leave these people with your debts if found a better group.



Reply With Quote