Vor-Syn Cog, or why socionics might be inconsistent

[PrelapsarianAdam]

Vortical-Synergetic Cognition is associated with thinking in terms of evolution in time. is the function used with evolution in time according to the internal logic of Socionics. So there must be a cause-and-effect relationship between and Vortical-Synergetic Cognition.

My first hypothesis was that is in the ego block of all VSC types and not in the ego block of all nonVSC types. Counterexample: SLI is VSC but doesn't have in the ego block.

My second hypothesis was that is a valued function of all VSC types and a non-valued function of all nonVSC types. Counterexample: ESE is VSC but doesn't value . It has as most vulnerable function.

So I don't think Socionics is internally consistent.

[Exodus]

Cognitive styles are not part of the fundamental fabric of socionics. What we should conclude from this is that cognitive styles are not consistent with classical socionics, much like many of DarkAngelFireWolf69's newer ideas.

[FDG]

?

you do understand that cognitive styles are derived from Reinin dichotomies, and not directly from functional preference, right?

[sbbds]

Vortical-Synergetic Cognition is associated with thinking in terms of evolution in time. is the function used with evolution in time according to the internal logic of Socionics. So there must be a cause-and-effect relationship between and Vortical-Synergetic Cognition.

My first hypothesis was that is in the ego block of all VSC types and not in the ego block of all nonVSC types. Counterexample: SLI is VSC but doesn't have in the ego block.

My second hypothesis was that is a valued function of all VSC types and a non-valued function of all nonVSC types. Counterexample: ESE is VSC but doesn't value . It has as most vulnerable function.

So I don't think Socionics is internally consistent.

They’re all dynamic types who have conscious . You’re welcome.

[FDG]

They’re all dynamic types who have conscious . You’re welcome.

You're right about that, but that's still not the source of v-s thinking style, which is rooted in positivism-dynamic-result.
I'm not even sure where the op got his idea from.

[sbbds]

You're right about that, but that's still not the source of v-s thinking style, which is rooted in positivism-dynamic-result.
I'm not even sure where the op got his idea from.

It’s not an idea, it’s an inability to find the source info or read carefully enough to have seen it I guess. Hence why he was still searching for a pattern.