Write Your Own Brief Self Type Description

[vesstheastralsilky]

If you're interested and have the time, write a brief description about how you would best describe your type in a generalized way that could include others. If another brief socionics or mbti portrait is a best fit for you already, you can go ahead and reference that instead. Maybe this will help others and yourself know, through comparisons etc, where you're coming from with your self-typing in relation to what you think your socionics type means wrt functions. There are still differences of opinion out there on what cognitive functions mean. If we don't get basic definitions right, there's kinda no point to any of it.

You can write a long one if you know it's pretty type consistent, if you want.

[vesstheastralsilky]

You can write keywords only if you like. Is there anything you find lacking in type descriptions about yourself?

For myself, the important keywords I would expect to see in a legit profile for my type, but unfortunately are not always represented, would be the following:

deep aesthetic ability and sensibilities, physical sensitivity, deeply emotional, highly sensual, calm with rare bouts of lively humor, imaginative, curious, truth-seeking researcher, contemplative, passive, inventive, down-to-earth, hopeful, compassionate, fairminded, helpful, gracious, logical, speculative, security-minded, comfort-oriented, nonathletic, freedom-loving, zany, nature loving, gentle, soft, kindhearted, altruistic, noncompetitive, peace-loving, interested in spirituality & esotericism, interested in culture studies, conscientious, self-starter, prefers to be independent or lead than be directed, common sense, principled, wise.

[vesstheastralsilky]

No, the descriptions should be distinct enough to describe sociotypes and loose enough so individuals can identify with them.

Ideally so, yet this is not always the case for all types.

[Bento]

Ideally so, yet this is not always the case for all types.

maybe.
But this thread is empty so most users seem to be okay with that. You'll probably get more engagement if you ask the opposite question: whether there are parts they don't identify with.

[vesstheastralsilky]

maybe.
But this thread is empty so most users seem to be okay with that. You'll probably get more engagement if you ask the opposite question: whether there are parts they don't identify with.

Nice Ne point. Others can feel free to comment on that note too of course.

[Beautiful sky]

I let my esfj sister compare us to each other and this is what she had to say

[Alomoes]

I'm a cruddy little market analyst.

Oh yeah, I don't have to. There's a video on it.

https://youtu.be/zSGWoFM64