Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: SURVEY - MBTI and Socionics Correlations

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FarDraft's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    TIM
    INTp 5
    Posts
    365
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Deleted.
    Last edited by FarDraft; 12-16-2018 at 12:29 AM.
    ----- FarDraft, 2020

  2. #2
    IQ over 150 vesstheastralsilky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    TIM
    ~°~
    Posts
    1,488
    Mentioned
    77 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    EDITED

    The last long MBTI test I took came up with INTP. I have usually tested INFP or J or INTP or J on self-tests.

    My real type is SEI-Si. This is due to cognitive analysis of functional meanings, my own deeply involved years of multifaceted research, intertype relations with all types, some parts of profiles with added reasoning, and Model A. And vi from multiple sources.

    I find self tests to be biased toward Se over Si and assume S types are less imaginative than many like myself can be. I will make a post about more on my experiences with having Si lead soon.
    Last edited by vesstheastralsilky; 11-26-2018 at 04:53 AM.
    ~* astralsilky



    Each essence is a separate glass,
    Through which Sun of Being’s Light is passed,
    Each tinted fragment sparkles with the Sun,
    A thousand colors, but the Light is One.

    Jami, 15th c. Persian Poet


    Post types & fully individuated before 2012 ...

  3. #3
    IQ over 150 vesstheastralsilky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    TIM
    ~°~
    Posts
    1,488
    Mentioned
    77 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vesstheastralsilky View Post
    EDITED

    The last long MBTI test I took came up with INTP. I have usually tested INFP or J or INTP or J on self-tests.

    My real type is SEI-Si. This is due to cognitive analysis of functional meanings, my own deeply involved years of multifaceted research, intertype relations with all types, some parts of profiles with added reasoning, and Model A. And vi from multiple sources.

    I find self tests to be biased toward Se over Si and assume S types are less imaginative than many like myself can be. I will make a post about more on my experiences with having Si lead soon.
    Update: the 1st MBTI tests I took multiple times between the ages of 15-19 scored me as INFP. Yet consider also this: ISFP is the Artist in MBTI, it takes a lot of imagination and idea orientation wrt space to create good art e.g. composing songs singing or painting or dancing, and these things have been a part of my behavior ever since earliest youth. I am squeamish and keenly body sensitive more than most. There must be a million other reasons at this point I chose SEI even though adapting to adulthood and life circumstances just to get by in the USA forced me to develop many other functions. Intertype relations was the final deciding factor for many many relationships. Also I used to make people I knew take type tests for years. So I have seen some type accurate and others spin their results due to subtypes and socialization adaptation factors and test biases.

    I also believe I reached Jungian full individuation of my psyche by age 40. I relate to ISFP INFJ INTP ISTP and INTJ profiles most.
    Last edited by vesstheastralsilky; 11-26-2018 at 01:40 PM.
    ~* astralsilky



    Each essence is a separate glass,
    Through which Sun of Being’s Light is passed,
    Each tinted fragment sparkles with the Sun,
    A thousand colors, but the Light is One.

    Jami, 15th c. Persian Poet


    Post types & fully individuated before 2012 ...

  4. #4
    Darn Socks DirectorAbbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southwest USA
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    7,123
    Mentioned
    381 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm already taking a survey that will address this correlation, among other things. I assure you I will be thorough, including seeking correlations with reinin dichotomies.

    LSE
    1-6-2 so/sx
    Johari Nohari

    Quote Originally Posted by Ritella View Post
    Over here, we'll put up with (almost) all of your crap. You just have to use the secret phrase: "I don't value it. It's related to <insert random element here>, which is not in my quadra."
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquagraph View Post
    Abbie is so boring and rigid it's awesome instead of boring and rigid. She seems so practical and down-to-the-ground.

  5. #5
    Darn Socks DirectorAbbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southwest USA
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    7,123
    Mentioned
    381 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FarDraft View Post
    I see. I'll leave this thread up since I'm sure there are many people who would like to participate in such a survey but do not have the time to answer so many questions.
    Sure, leave the thread up as you ask some specifics I won't be addressing.
    But if someone doesn't have time to answer all my questions, I can use whatever they do provide. Some data is better than none.

    I'm LSE-Si1 N. LSE I've known since the day I learned socionics existed. Si took a long time to figure out and it's not a strong subtype. I don't really know DCNH, but people say I'm N.
    I'm not clear on my MBTI type. I've gotten ISTJ, ISTP, and ESTJ. I figure I can take the average and go with ISTJ. I'm definitely an ST type. And it tends to mistake me for an introvert. But irl people do too.

    Quote Originally Posted by FarDraft View Post
    Also, please let me know when you have the results of your survey. I'm interested in seeing these patterns.
    I'll make a whole thread about it.

    Quote Originally Posted by FarDraft View Post
    I will probably take part in your survey in some time.
    Alright. Please do so this week. I'd like this to be my last week of gathering responses.

    LSE
    1-6-2 so/sx
    Johari Nohari

    Quote Originally Posted by Ritella View Post
    Over here, we'll put up with (almost) all of your crap. You just have to use the secret phrase: "I don't value it. It's related to <insert random element here>, which is not in my quadra."
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquagraph View Post
    Abbie is so boring and rigid it's awesome instead of boring and rigid. She seems so practical and down-to-the-ground.

  6. #6
    Honorary Ballsack
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    3,361
    Mentioned
    110 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I usually score INTJ in both, but I tend to have the low energy of INTPs in both. Description wise, INTP in both.

  7. #7
    Fay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Europe
    TIM
    NF
    Posts
    1,283
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    MBTI - INFP
    Socionics - IEI Ni Creative Subtype

    I think MBTI is only about dichotomies and the functions are only secondary. I work with functions more when it comes to socionics, and the basic dichotomies/temperaments as well. My biggest argument for IEI against EII right now is that I mostly relate to Ip temperament and am definitely irrational type.


  8. #8
    Honorary Ballsack
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    3,361
    Mentioned
    110 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Freya View Post
    MBTI - INFP
    Socionics - IEI Ni Creative Subtype

    I think MBTI is only about dichotomies and the functions are only secondary. I work with functions more when it comes to socionics, and the basic dichotomies/temperaments as well. My biggest argument for IEI against EII right now is that I mostly relate to Ip temperament and am definitely irrational type.
    Same. Ip temperament as well. I don't think the quadra should be taken very seriously as they are mostly speculative in theory and should not be the basis of one's self-identity. Actually, I think dominant function and temperament are generally good indicators overall. After that I think interests and other traits are more relevant.

  9. #9
    Kiba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    ISTp SLI-0,1Te sxsp
    Posts
    3,419
    Mentioned
    413 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    ISTP in most tests.
    SLI all the tests 1Te or 0(no sub) from tests, D subtype from reading DCNH descriptions.
    Tests, VI, theory, descriptions, information elements, IRs.

  10. #10
    DRANG NACH BETA NF Oppai Anschluss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    In the place
    TIM
    Beta ST 683 sx/so
    Posts
    397
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ISTP on most tests

    LSI 1-2 Se from most tests, C subtype from reading LSI subtype descriptions. Been told to consider LIE, as well

    Discussion with more informed members, reading about aspects of information elements in different positions, survey answers, and descriptions of how different types of programs communicate
    Beta ST 6w5 8w9 3w4 sx/so

    Every problem on earth can be solved by the liberal application of ordnance

    "Ultimately, man should not ask what the meaning of his life is, but rather he must recognize that it is he who is asked. In a word, each man is questioned by life; and he can only answer to life by answering for his own life."


  11. #11
    Xaiviay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    TIM
    SEI-Fe1 9w1 sx/sp
    Posts
    468
    Mentioned
    69 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm interested in this, too. I think there's too much confidence in the J/P switch for the introverts and it confused me badly when I first came to Socionics.

    My MBTI type: ISFP - came to that from a year of studying Myers Briggs functions and considering various types. I could see myself using all 8 functions, and it was hard to tell which ones were most dominant. First test result got me INTJ, and I was very much stuck in analyzing mode during that point of my life, but over time it didn't sit right with me. Then I considered ENTJ (that consideration didn't last long LOL), then INFJ, then INTP, then ENFP, then INFP, then ENTP (as you can see, I went all over the place).....being a sensor was the last thing I wanted for myself, lol, but once I admitted that possibility, ISFP seemed like an obvious choice. It was the last type I wanted to see myself as, but it really was most in alignment with how I naturally think and act - being attuned to the physical environment and how it makes me feel on an aesthetic/emotional/personal level, constantly. And, being skilled at manipulating the physical environment to my personal artistic preferences.

    My Sociotype - SEI - came to Socionics and at first assumed I must be ESI, but that confused the crap out of me because I had already experienced conflict with confirmed LIEs, and duality with confirmed ILEs. Eventually I realized there wasn't necessarily a J/P switch and settled into my SEI typing quite happily. SEI sounds a lot like MBTI Fi+Se, to me, I don't know where people get the J/P switch from! Imo, MBTI does a slightly better job of explaining the ISFp personality than Socionics does, in terms of it's 'free-spirited-ness', even if it's Socionics that gets the information elements and intertype relations correct. Socionics makes ISFp sound plain and homely, but we are weird/crazy/nerdy alpha-quadra types at heart, even if we're not always confident at expressing it. We want to abandon tradition and try things just for the sake of pleasure and novelty, otherwise we wouldn't even be Ne-suggestive.

    I'm curious if other SEIs relate?

    And I've had people try to tell me that since I'm SEI, I must be ISFJ in myers briggs...but that typing sounds so very Gamma-quadra to me?? I can't relate to it at all, I'm not service-oriented, traditionalist, dutiful/disciplined (wish I were - that's a good quality), concerned with hierarchy and societal structures, preoccupied with morality, longing for structure and routine and 'the right, prescribed way' of doing things - none of the qualities attached to ISFJ.

    I've since questioned my Sociotype many times, especially considering ESE and SEE, but SEI pans out as the most accurate. I've thought it through in terms of Information Elements, all of the translated type descriptions online that I can find, and each intertype relation.

    Subtype Fe1 - I relate to both SEI subtype descriptions a lot honestly, but just slightly more to the Fe-subtype description. I don't know my DCNH subtype for sure right now.

  12. #12

    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    TIM
    SLE.Wait...Shit, EII
    Posts
    329
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    for myself it's quite easy, I don't use MBTI anymore, it's plain junk wich was made by some bunch of psychollogical fallacy, melted with moral POV, a discret need to discredit sensor and making INFP as god while the author probably mystiped herself because she was trying to feel it's cool to be P instead of J.

    there is no correlation to be made, MBTI should just be abandonned.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •