Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 81 to 85 of 85

Thread: Differences between mirror types LIE (ENTj) and ILI (INTp)

  1. #81

    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Germany
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    722
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hag View Post
    LIE: chad
    ILI: incel

    What's the female version?

  2. #82
    Perennial Wanderer Phantom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    193
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zero View Post
    I would say ILI, the Ni sounds almost beta, have you been in alot of contact with NF betas?
    Interesting. Are you talking about the Ni section in the questionnaire? Even if I was in contact with them, I wouldn’t know because I’m shit at typing lol. Won’t say my answers were influenced by anything external though.

    What do you mean when you say that my Ni sounds beta?

  3. #83

    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Germany
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    722
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantom View Post
    Interesting. Are you talking about the Ni section in the questionnaire? Even if I was in contact with them, I wouldn’t know because I’m shit at typing lol. Won’t say my answers were influenced by anything external though.
    No I detected strong Ni in the first spoiler text. Hadn't yet read the questionnaire but you remind me of my ILI friend who reads a lot of Sadegh Hedayat, who is also ILI. What you wrote also sounds a bit like Hedayat I would say.

  4. #84
    Smilex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    295
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I would point out that the picture Phantom uses is one you could use as an archetypal image of the INTp soulscape. Also the writing most definitely seems like the passive accepting viewing of thought flow that characterizes INTp-Ni.
    I disagree with beta. There's a clear structure here: "Like it or not, Dubstep is the classical music of today. Not implying that Skrillex is as talented as Mozart but in 2200, our generation will probably be associated with dubstep just like the days of the Renaissance are associated with classical music. Dubstep is a perfect representation of the current generation because it screams what it's all about - technology."

    This structure has a strongly declarative, narratorial style. No questions, no room for the opinions of others. This person is literally creating Te. Making up new facts. "Like it or not, Dubstep is the classical music of today". That's a sentence that when written in Rolling stone magazine could define an era, be repeated for years.

    Contrast to Zero's ENTj-style is clear enough.

  5. #85
    Alomoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    TIM
    LIE ENTj
    Posts
    843
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Fun fact. The music you like is what makes you smarter. Mozart and Skrillex performed equally in the test to people who liked it, but unequally to the people who preferred one. I'd find the test, but no. Not enough effort today.

    Huge difference is tendency to write a ton vs tendency to post large amounts of writing by someone else that is good. One is more efficient, but requires other people to have written about the subject. I've seen a wall of articles posted before on various discords, and that's about typical. I'll post a wall of text, and maybe one article. Other option is that I suck at doing bibliographies, which is likely true.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrenology

    An optimist - does not get discouraged under any circumstances. Life upheavals and stressful events only toughen him and make more confident. He likes to laugh and entertain people. Enters contact with someone by involving him with a humorous remark. His humor is often sly and contain hints and double meanings. Easily enters into arguments and bets, especially if he is challenged. When arguing his points is often ironic, ridicules the views of his opponent. His irritability and hot temper may be unpleasant to others. However, he himself is not perceptive of this and believes that he is simply exchanging opinions.

    http://www.wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=LIE_Profile_by_Gulenko

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •