I have read that Ne creatives enjoy creating opportunities for others more than they do for themselves and I think it's true from personal experience. I'm talking about preference, not skill.
I used to play soccer a lot when I was younger, and I used to prefer the position of a play maker but I wasn't very impressive, just average. But when I reached 15/16 and moved to another team the coach played me as a striker, since I've always felt awkward defending and the striker didn't need to do that. We didn't have a good striker at the time too so he wanted to use me in that position. It felt weird being the focal point of attack and I honestly didn't think I'd enjoy it. My style was actually very close to Messi. I was very self sufficient in terms of setting up myself to score, which is kind of unusual for a striker. And it ended up being one of my best seasons in terms of performance.
I have a huge preference to play supportive characters in games as well, when in reality I do better in other, more impactful, roles.
IRL this was something I had to fight internally in my teenage years: my inclination to enjoy spending a lot of time on thinking of how to improve the lives of others, while settling for being average when I think of myself. Then I had a period when I was very selfish and actually improved rapidly. I think, I'm somewhere in between right now. I recognize my passion for improving things/people, but I'm much more picky in terms of whom/what I spend my time on. I'm also able to screen ungrateful people, or someone who is unlikely to change, as I don't like wasting time or not being given credit or appreciated - which I think where Ne hidden agenda comes in to play.
This is not my theory. I've seen it discussed in some parts elsewhere, "how the creative function of one type interacts with the hidden agenda of their dual". But I wanted to share my personal understanding of it.


Reply With Quote
duals can push through with it.
