@Troll Nr 007, Wow that chart really shows me how mixed up DarkAngelFireWolf69's understanding is compared to mine. I can agree with many but not all of his delineations except he has split some into two, can't distinguish Se from Si (both his descriptions are in fact Si) for example, and has just about all his labels wrong.
I liked the socionics website link @thehotelambush recently cited as a reference. Now, where is that ... The data in there started from pure definitions and then expanded with logic, not collecting datasets and pinning the wrong labels on the functions like DarkAngelFireWolf69 has done. Just because someone is very diligent doesn't necessarily mean their work should be taken as truth. *sigh* how frustrating. This kind of thing only continues to befuddle typeseekers. Though I suppose a theory may require much work and refining from many until it is perfected.


