Typing

[The Reality Denialist]

I'm interested, how do you see SLE more (or less?) discrete than LSI? Or different in what way in terms of discreteness?

I don't really hear LSI's calling a or b without considering boundaries (as in while "thinking on their feet"). [I tend to put those discrete things on rest. For example discrete math is clearly my least favorite area.]

[Sisyphean]

I don't really hear LSI's calling a or b without considering boundaries (as in while "thinking on their feet"). [I tend to put those discrete things on rest. For example discrete math is clearly my least favorite area.]

Since you mentioned it Discrete Mathematics was actually the only math class I ever really enjoyed a lot lol but I have a sneaking suspicion that just a decisive vs judicious thing

[Myst]

I don't really hear LSI's calling a or b without considering boundaries (as in while "thinking on their feet"). [I tend to put those discrete things on rest. For example discrete math is clearly my least favorite area.]

Er, a or b? I'm missing context, please say more.

Since you mentioned it Discrete Mathematics was actually the only math class I ever really enjoyed a lot lol but I have a sneaking suspicion that just a decisive vs judicious thing

I don't think the Socionics model can be used well for such fine details of cognition heh

[The Reality Denialist]

Er, a or b? I'm missing context, please say more.

By not filtering things through binary logic if you will all the time. I'm not saying that they do not do it at all. I see it more flexible but then others might see it as following its own continual train of thought.

Like this

instead of n=1, 2, 3,...

[Myst]

By not filtering things through binary logic if you will all the time. I'm not saying that they do not do it at all. I see it more flexible but then others might see it as following its own continual train of thought.

Like this

instead of n=1, 2, 3,...

I've never known anyone who truly just had binary logic all the time lol

Am I following you though, 1st example here is adding extra math or boundaries or whatever you meant, which is necessary to be a proper LSI in your opinion? And second one is SLE discreteness or?

[The Reality Denialist]

I've never known anyone who truly just had binary logic all the time lol

Am I following you though, 1st example here is adding extra math or boundaries or whatever you meant, which is necessary to be a proper LSI in your opinion? And second one is SLE discreteness or?

LSI seems to weight things much more within boundaries than SLE but of course SLE has to do it to some extent. The actual quality of it depends on the individual.

[Myst]

LSI seems to weight things much more within boundaries than SLE but of course SLE has to do it to some extent. The actual quality of it depends on the individual.

Do you see it with me?

I think @Oppai Anschluss definitely draws boundaries/limits a lot tho'. Have you got any example, say in his writings here in the thread, where you see it as just 1, 2, 3...?

[The Reality Denialist]

Do you see it with me?

I think @Oppai Anschluss definitely draws boundaries/limits a lot tho'. Have you got any example, say in his writings here in the thread, where you see it as just 1, 2, 3...?

You are definitely trying to see beyond. Maybe one could say that is better Ni. When I made a thread about difference between up/down vs left/right recognition he was more fixated to actual rules of the task (which noted the time difference) than comparing relation t(left+right)/t(up+down) [which in my opinion is better metric]. That is just my subjective judgement.