Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 55 of 55

Thread: IEE-Fi versus EII-Ne

  1. #41

    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    TIM
    Sanguin Spiritualist
    Posts
    237
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    Define C4.
    Conscious LV4/D4 i.e. Leading Function
    Quote Originally Posted by domr View Post
    C4/C2/U4/U2 are even. Leading/Role/Demonstrative/Mobilizing
    Example: SE-
    Code:
         Subjective | Objective
                S-4 | E-3 [Ego]
    Conscious   I-2 | L-1 [Super-Ego]
    ----------------|-----------------
    Unconscious E-4 | E-3 [Id]
                L-2 | I-1 [Super Id]
    This is the psyche of the SE- type. If you want to create a subtype then you need to modify this diagram. That's the axiomatic way to create subtypes. With this system the only way to do that would be the change the function strength.

  2. #42
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,936
    Mentioned
    484 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm impressed anyone got pookie to talk so much

  3. #43
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,936
    Mentioned
    484 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    more gulenko heresy


  4. #44

    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    TIM
    Sanguin Spiritualist
    Posts
    237
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Bertrand

    Gulenko is totally clueless to intuitive ethics @1:40, also called maturity. People learn and grow and they develop other aspects to themselves besides the leading function. Does he not understand Model A has 8 functions and not 1?

    Ambivert does not exist because a person would be indifferent between functions. It would freeze them. The entire reason we have function strengths is to get around this indifference problem.

  5. #45
    wasp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    TIM
    ZGM
    Posts
    1,558
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm going to borrow "depth of interactions" because that's a good point

    so I actually think there are more base similarities between IEE-Fi + EII-Fi and IEE-Ne + EII-Ne

    tl;dr IEE-Fi is what would happen if you fed EII-Fi a bunch of MDMA, whereas EII-Ne is what would happen if you fed IEE-Ne a bunch of Xanax

    IEE-Fi seeks depth in their interactions, but they do so while "planting seeds" across a wide spectrum (work, school, extracurriculars) in stereotypical Ep fashion, but they're still not Dostoevsky, so it doesn't magically become a matter of deepening emotional bonds between other people, it's just making friends on an individual basis across a wide spectrum, and they do so in almost a Dostoevsky way - think Huxley motivation (Ne) Dostoevsky method (Fi)

    EII-Ne seeks depth in their interactions, and they might collect their friends from various places (work, school, extracurriculars), but eventually they'll want to bring those friends into a single place, so there's an attachment at play (and by that I mean static bonds, Fi) and their means of communication is less about kindness, even if it's still there, it's more about connecting through common interests - think Dostoevsky motivation (Fi) Huxley method (Ne)

    I don't usually like using forumites as examples, but in this case, I remember I recognized more immediate similarities between Raver and Subteigh, than I did between Subteigh and myshkin, but after I spent more time on the forum, I began to see growing similarities between Subteigh and myshkin
    awldjkwepierpgokqweølfqøerlkfdaergnhtm¨å¨æ''-we-fqpoeufasdøflthøljwtlhkjrøtlhhhhhhhhhhsapfoeporipr
    "WELL I'M SORRY THAT I LIKE TO HAVE OPEN COMMUNICATION IN MY RELATIONSHIPS" - Galen 2k13

  6. #46
    Delilah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    1,469
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've read 2 EII-Ne subtype descriptions, one by Gulenko and the other one i can't recall who it was written by (Meged? rings a bell? ). Anyway, the differences weren't very clear to me. Are there any other subtype descriptions i am missing out on? Thanks
    "Inasmuch as it is nothing but pure communicability, every face, even the most noble and beautiful, is always suspended on the edge of an abyss"

  7. #47
    Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    4,938
    Mentioned
    220 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Delilah View Post
    I've read 2 EII-Ne subtype descriptions, one by Gulenko and the other one i can't recall who it was written by (Meged? rings a bell? ). Anyway, the differences weren't very clear to me. Are there any other subtype descriptions i am missing out on? Thanks
    Read the Fi-EII and Fi-IEE descriptions and see if any of them fit you:

    http://www.sociotype.com/socionics/t...INFj/subtypes/
    http://www.sociotype.com/socionics/t...ENFp/subtypes/

    Both are at the bottom.
    “We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-9w1-4w5

  8. #48
    Delilah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    1,469
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Raver View Post
    Read the Fi-EII and Fi-IEE descriptions and see if any of them fit you:

    http://www.sociotype.com/socionics/t...INFj/subtypes/
    http://www.sociotype.com/socionics/t...ENFp/subtypes/

    Both are at the bottom.
    Hey Raver,
    thanks for the links. I'll read them. However, I'm very intrigued by the EII-Ne subtype. Both, for seeing if it fits and for understanding that subtype better. Are there any other ones out there? I kinda vaguely recall having read something by Beskova (i think that was their name....?) a few years back and can't seem to locate it now. Thanks.
    "Inasmuch as it is nothing but pure communicability, every face, even the most noble and beautiful, is always suspended on the edge of an abyss"

  9. #49
    Delilah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    1,469
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by consentingadult View Post
    What problem are you trying to solve here? Are you perhaps trying to find out whether you are IEE or EII yourself?
    @consentingadult: only partially my interest in this started as i was wavering between 3 Fi-ego types, and then continued to read as it was still intriguing and i made the thread after i realized that even having read the subtype articles i was having difficulties differentiating between EII -NE and IEE for instance. Thanks for your comment.
    "Inasmuch as it is nothing but pure communicability, every face, even the most noble and beautiful, is always suspended on the edge of an abyss"

  10. #50
    inabox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    210
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Delilah View Post
    I see your point. I was wondering though for instance why IEE-Fi can't be more similar to ESI rather than SEE? If all what you're saying applies, then if you take into account the thinking style "hologrpahic" too, and, assuming that that is preserved as well, than wouldn't IEE-Fi be more similar to ESI? Just wondering
    I'm Fi-IEE - sometimes I relate a lot to ESIs more than SEEs despite being us both being EPs. I read about a Fi-SEE who felt the same about EIIs.

  11. #51
    a two horned unicorn renegade Heretic 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Sol's emo club
    TIM
    ILE-C-I
    Posts
    4,844
    Mentioned
    209 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by inabox View Post
    I'm Fi-IEE - sometimes I relate a lot to ESIs more than SEEs despite being us both being EPs. I read about a Fi-SEE who felt the same about EIIs.
    Yeah. IEE's and ESI might both perceive offensive humor as very bad.. They are both "feel good" people. Like everyone should be OK with it. SEE's usually have much less problem with division and I might say that this even applies to EII's in some limits and these are not really so much "feel good" people.
    Measuring you right now

  12. #52
    stare into me flames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    As seen on T.V.
    TIM
    E I E I OOOOO Sx/So
    Posts
    1,776
    Mentioned
    242 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by inabox View Post
    I'm Fi-IEE - sometimes I relate a lot to ESIs more than SEEs despite being us both being EPs. I read about a Fi-SEE who felt the same about EIIs.
    I think it’s because IEE and ESI both share -Fi and SEE and EII both share +Fi. Being ethical types, their style of ethics is probably the most important thing that bridges their relationships with people - including the two Ep types who aren’t ethical base. IEE and ESI are both the type of people you’d expect at a protest, for example, because of the nature of -Fi. SEE and EII are more harmonic, I think, even if SEE is more bold than IEE (they still try to get along generally and aren’t as hostile as -Fi; I’ve noticed my IEE friend has a quick temper and there’s a line you can’t cross with her otherwise she’s ruthless and ESIs are famously the same way).
    And I'm what you desire, like a siren in the night



    Quote Originally Posted by Starfall
    Everyone, pls give Bled some likes. He craves the likes much like Suedehead craves the cock.
    7w6 2w3 8w9 - The Free Spirit

  13. #53
    stare into me flames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    As seen on T.V.
    TIM
    E I E I OOOOO Sx/So
    Posts
    1,776
    Mentioned
    242 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Anyways, I think the difference between IEE and EII is pretty big regardless of subtype. IEE is a lot more risqué and morally ambiguous; not that they don’t have morals but you’ll notice they do and justify things that an EII never would. Basically, differences in temperament which can be stark.
    And I'm what you desire, like a siren in the night



    Quote Originally Posted by Starfall
    Everyone, pls give Bled some likes. He craves the likes much like Suedehead craves the cock.
    7w6 2w3 8w9 - The Free Spirit

  14. #54
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    24,960
    Mentioned
    608 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    I’m quite, calm, not a lot of energy and I don’t show much excitement and enthrallment
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
    Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  15. #55
    inabox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    210
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flames View Post
    Anyways, I think the difference between IEE and EII is pretty big regardless of subtype. IEE is a lot more risqué and morally ambiguous; not that they don’t have morals but you’ll notice they do and justify things that an EII never would. Basically, differences in temperament which can be stark.
    I think Fi-subtype IEE (and Fi-SEEs I suppose) are less inclined to be morally ambiguous. At least I perceive that difference between myself and Ne-IEEs (with one of them I was like, the f-k? But then all types can have uhh moral ickiness). But still, immnot morally unambiguous as my Ne-EII sister whom I look up to.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •