IEE-Fi versus EII-Ne

[Pookie]

Semantics & Metaphor.




You just contradicted yourself. 1 is blocks. 2 is temperament.



C4/C2/U4/U2 are even. Leading/Role/Demonstrative/Mobilizing

If half the functions were stronger creative subtypes would be stronger than leading subtypes. leading subtypes would have total function strength of 20 while creative would be more than 20. That doesn't work.



That's exactly how Jung explained it. In Socionics, the strength of the functions comes from the dimensionally. So to bolster a function means to increase it's strength.



I never said it does. Like I said, it makes leading ~3.7D instead of 4D and all functions get scaled accordingly. Order is the same but strength changes.



That doesn't make any sense. Role function opposes creative. +P vs -J. If you were to strength both, it would negate the changes in temperament.

Plus in reality, creative subtypes appear more balanced and have a better use of both suggestive and vulnerable functions.



Again you don't seem to even understand basic Model A block theory. SE+ has completely different blocks than IE+ or EI-

Oh, you just don't know much, ok. You're not arguing my conclusions, your arguing structural axioms. Not going to make sense to you until you read it yourself.

Your reading comprehension might be why everyone who's been here for 5-10 years is disagreeing with you. The bolded doesn't contradict. Semantics doesn't mean meaningless it means meaning. Creative is an even numbered function, Base is odd. Creative and Base subtypes don't strengthen the same functions. Maybe you don't mean that, but your words say that. Which is why I said your being sloppy with your words.

[domr]

@Pookie

That's exactly correct. I am arguing axioms because your conclusions don't follow the axioms which means they are not real.

As I said, I define even as C4/C2/U4/C2. I'm not using the illogical geometric black/white figure model because it's not correct.

[Pookie]

@Pookie

That's exactly correct. I am arguing axioms because your conclusions don't follow the axioms which means they are not real.

As I said, I define even as C4/C2/U4/C2. I'm not using the illogical geometric black/white figure model because it's not correct.

Define C4.

[domr]

Define C4.

Conscious LV4/D4 i.e. Leading Function

C4/C2/U4/U2 are even. Leading/Role/Demonstrative/Mobilizing

Example: SE-

     Subjective | Objective
            S-4 | E-3 [Ego]
Conscious   I-2 | L-1 [Super-Ego]
----------------|-----------------
Unconscious E-4 | E-3 [Id]
            L-2 | I-1 [Super Id]

This is the psyche of the SE- type. If you want to create a subtype then you need to modify this diagram. That's the axiomatic way to create subtypes. With this system the only way to do that would be the change the function strength.