Read the Socionics Library.

[domr]

I just found the Socionics library. There is quite a bit of research that hasn't been translated into English. If you are serious about learning this subject then you might want to read some of the articles. Attached below is a link to the function relationships.

http://library.socionic.info/Model-A?lang=ru

http://library.socionic.info/vnutren...heniya?lang=ru

[Capitalist Pig]

Соционическая библиотека

[Bertrand]

I like this place as well

here is DarkAngelFireWolf69's website too

and Strat's

[domr]

What do you guys think of "Internal relations of model A and intertype relations?" This one seems really important.

[domr]

Here is the original article that started everything. I think everyone needs to read Jung's original work and Augustinavitchite's original work. These are the foundations for everything. Basically the old and new testament.

http://socionic.info/ru/aushra/index.html#top

And here is the model of information & energy mobilization (personally I think this article is too NT).

http://socionic.info/ru/t/dvevert.html#top

[Sol]

any theory which is not by Jung and Augustinavichiute is not Socionics and it's better to do not use it

also take into account. all the said by them is hypotheses and hence can be partly wrong. where Augustinavichiute contradicts to Jung - it's either the same from other view or more probably her mistake. the texts of both have places deserving different degree for the trust

[ooo]

And here is the model of information & energy mobilization (personally I think this article is too NT).

http://socionic.info/ru/t/dvevert.html#top

wow where did you find that! nice article and plot twist. she divides the model in columns to start, aha ha )

this site has nice articles too http://socionicasys.org/biblioteka/statji

here Augusta on Jung http://www.socioniko.net/ru/articles/aug-comment.html

[domr]

wow where did you find that! nice article and plot twist. she divides the model in columns to start, aha ha )

this site has nice articles too http://socionicasys.org/biblioteka/statji

here Augusta on Jung http://www.socioniko.net/ru/articles/aug-comment.html

Thanks.
Now I know why her work is called Model (A)ugusta
Her note confirms my own interpretation of Jung's work, that in Model J, Jung believed the other 3 functions were opposite the dominant in I/E.
I'm still a little confused on how she created the blocks, specifically how she named them. That's the last piece of research that I need to understand Model A.

I also found the derivation for ITR
http://en.socionicasys.org/teorija/dlja-novichkov/mezhtimnye-otnoshenija/dualnye

[ooo]

Thanks.
Now I know why her work is called Model (A)ugustinavičiūtė.
Her note confirms my own interpretation of Jung's work, that in Model J, Jung believed the other 3 functions were opposite the dominant in I/E.
I'm still a little confused on how she created the blocks, specifically how she named them. That's the last piece of research that I need to understand Model A.

I also found the derivation for ITR
http://en.socionicasys.org/teorija/dlja-novichkov/mezhtimnye-otnoshenija/dualnye

aha ure funny

ah yeah that's interesting, I think that column division of the static and dynamic elements is a hint to how to build the blocks. E/I elements mix and reflect (exclude) each other. All the functions are opposite the dominant, say Te excludes Ti, and Fe, and Fi, and obviously all the irrational elements similarly. It's about priorities... The idea of blocks comes from mixed models of the mind, there's Freud inside of it too, and the information metabolism of Kempinski .

[domr]