^ So you're saying that "I define EIIs as those people who are meek and quiet and does not take leadership roles". Okay.

You're also saying that "EIIs are those spiritual and ethical people, and so therefore may easily take the role of the leader in such spiritual environments". Ok.

Socionics and Gulenko says that "The meekness of an EII that I've observed, is explained by the fact by their Se-PoLR, since Se-PoLR is a weakness in sensing or being territorial in the physical sense. This is because it is the opposite of their Ne. Being good in Ne-imagination must mean that they're weak in their physical sensations". Ok.

But Gulenko tries to make sense of new observations: "If that's true, then how could there exist such a new type of EIIs that I have observed, such as the EII-D, who IS usually meek and ethical, but can also take the role of the leader occasionally, or is in fact quite aggressive? I will explain this fact by introducing the 'subtypes' of EIIs." Ok.