Quote Originally Posted by strangeling View Post
leading subtype - Role function is more of a polr because they don't have as much of a focused creative. Has stronger use of leading, HA, demonstrative, and Polr, but not role. Producing elements that woof talks about are "subdued".
Creative subtype - Dimensionality seems to fit, as abstract as it sounds. Producing "elements" are there and such. Standard socionics types. Easier to type people like this. Cookie-cutter, etc.

[...]

leading subtype's role is their Polr.
Really interesting take. I think this is definitely a viable possibility.

Calling PoLR the "blindspot" is definitely a viable way of looking at it.

One issue -- you did mention subscribing to the yin/yang view on IEs too. In your model for the leading subtype, by what mechanism would the type have stronger use of both demonstrative and polr, with them being opposites?