✦✦✦ Socionics Links ✦✦✦
✦✦✦ Enneagram Links ✦✦✦
A Socionics Test
Other Socionics Tests
Socionics Test Rating Project
Socionics types and Music Preference
Post Interesting Psychology Articles
Personality Traits of American Cities
Personality Traits Correlations
A Biased Reading List
Google Scholar Alerts
We Are What We Watch
Post Random Pictures Thread
Post Interesting Articles Thread
Best Countries To Emigrate To, Possibly
I feel like typing pinterests
I mean maybe he does, but like I said I haven't had a lot of interactions with him in chat. I only noticed that he very often says hi. I completely ignore chat unless I choose to write stuff (I generally "blank out" anything that is not important for me at a given moment including messages, profiles etc.), and I try to only voice typings when I've reached a certain level of certainty. right now I'm unsure about his type so I will refrain. just wanted to give my two cents since he seems to look for some answers.
I'm going to type you with any type you want if you pay extra 20 €.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Your life is too short to actually do anything useful with it without being wasteful.
It’s summertime now. We should all move onto AP.
Nah, kidding. You can have the best of both worlds. If you dare.
"Now is the time to get serious about living your ideals. How long can you afford to put off who you really want to be? Your nobler self cannot wait any longer. Put your principles into practice – now. Stop the excuses and the procrastination. This is your life! You aren’t a child anymore. The sooner you set yourself to your spiritual program, the happier you will be. The longer you wait, the more you’ll be vulnerable to mediocrity and feel filled with shame and regret, because you know you are capable of better. From this instant on, vow to stop disappointing yourself. Separate yourself from the mob. Decide to be extraordinary and do what you need to do – now." - Epictetus
If you're not chickenshit, I'll see your ass in class this Saturday and I'll make sure to let the other students know how you've been riding on G's coattails and don't know shit about socionics basics or even Quadra values.
I don’t even remember what mine is
hmm I also picked a readable font with just the tiniest hint of stylistic element I guess in a color I like
I bold my font because it's easier to read. I am not sure if I am more introverted or extroverted, tbh. I think, though, that I prefer to spend more of my time alone even if I enjoy social interaction to a point and prefer work where I am mostly left alone though I can work well in a team provided that the team isn't full of dickheads and morons or slackers. I forgot to add snitches to the list, unless it's something serious (like when my coworker figured out two of our other coworkers in our department were stealing merchandise. Surprisingly one of those alleged thieves still work for the company...it's amazing what ass kissing will do for someone).
@ashlesha btw, your art choice says Se-Ni over Ne-Si to me. You also seem to like minimalistic but weighty/meaningful...framing of things. In words or otherwise. General vibe you give.
Your “curiosity” - a few - reminded me of things I’ve been curious about and looked up videos/articles on but I wouldn’t put them on Pinterest haha
@SlytherinPower by VI I think SEE (saying this since you seem to be looking for type opinions a while back)
im not very trained in VI and I’m terrible at spotting little sensory details like that but I get the general gist from what cognitive types vultology so that’s where I’m coming from on this. If other authors like DarkAngelFireWolf69 published more in detail VI methods they use I would be curious to look into them as well. I suspect there might be overlaps, which is why I am currently okay using the CT model.
also VI need not always be accurate lol. Your type is upto you ultimately
Last edited by asd; 04-06-2021 at 10:26 PM.
Singu - IEI
I haven't really read any of his posts about Karl Popper and I don't know who that is.
These are my impressions any way, I may or may not be accurate. I do not mean any offense.
Maybe IEIs behave differently around Beta STs, maybe this is just type heterogeneity, but - actually! Maybe he is being playful and "seeking understanding." idk his interactions with Ti egos.
I think you think they are dripping with Fi because on the surface they are moralistic, but I don't think he is that personally invested in them - again the argumentation style of a non Fi lead type. Low D valued Fi? You are typing him Te ego?
Why do you think he's not personally invested in them, is there any proof of this or did you just make this up because you don't think they make sense compared to your personal values? The reason you could speculate it's valued but crappy Fi is the simplicity of the moralistic arguments. I was considering ILI, the benefit partner of EII, before the argumentation got really sloppy.
Ti is impersonal, not moralistic. Categorical moral judgements stem from Fi. You can observe the back-and-forth with xerxe (an ILE) for example, and see how they fundamentally disagree.
However, to summarize, his kind of shitty moralistic argumentation is something I've seen in Fi leads trying to use their role Ti. You can tell it's all personal values disguised as a logical argument based on some ultimate scientific truth (bonus points for quoting random studies to fortify your opinions).
For example, I posted that one of the foundational principles of BDSM is that it's "safe sane and consensual." I linked to it. It was completely ignored whilst he continued the same argument as before, conflating abuse with BDSM - common mistake! But when solutions or answers to "problems" seem to be ignored, as a general trend in behavior, I ask myself if this person is Te PoLR. This is usually accompanied by confusing (lack of) reasoning, things don’t really follow from one thing, posts are impervious to what seems obvious to me.
I didn't "make anything up," I simply observed his behavior. I am not being deceptive.Why do you think he's not personally invested in them, is there any proof of this or did you just make this up because you don't think they make sense compared to your personal values? The reason you could speculate it's valued but crappy Fi is the simplicity of the moralistic arguments. I was considering ILI, the benefit partner of EII, before the argumentation got really sloppy.
He goes back and forth playing with - only one kind - of logic. Maybe its weak logic, you are right. But IEI and EII have same strength of Ti.
It doesn't have anything to do with my personal values either.
You can tell it's all personal values disguised as a logical argument based on some ultimate scientific truth (bonus points for quoting random studies to fortify your opinions).
I know what you are talking about but I don't think he does this.
Last edited by asd; 04-13-2021 at 09:23 PM.
I'm not saying you're being deceptive on purpose but it's far-fetched to claim their behavior is pure trolling and not sincere moralizing.I didn't "make anything up," I simply observed his behavior. I am not being deceptive. He goes back and forth playing with - only one kind - of logic. Maybe its weak logic, you are right. But IEI and EII have same strength of Ti.
It doesn't have anything to do with my personal values either.
More commonly, lead XX types may think someone with PoLR XX (same function) is going around in circles. But it need not be limited to that.
I have never said it was either pure trolling or sincere moralizing though, lol. I guess the best way to put it is IEIs are semi-invested (personally) in the arguments but not as much as EII. Again - general trend, need not always hold true, there will be exceptions, and so on. But despite all that...yeah.
You did conflate "playful" with "trolling," (and that it must be the case with IEI) but I didn't respond to that since I considered it evident enough that's not what I was saying/ is a black-and-white interpretation of it. But anyways, just to clarify.
Based on the history of Singu moralizing around the forum all the time instead of randomly in a thread or two for the lulz speaks for them being fully invested, not "semi-invested".
Thus any argument that Singu isn't being sincere in their opinions means that it's actual trolling, as in trying to make others take the bait and believe they're actually serious with their arguments. That's not playfulness.
Singu - SLI
Si subtype - has no Ni or Ne
Ti demonstrative: argumentativeness without actually listening, needs to be right, mostly when he isn't
Normalizing : wants to enforce (not always appropriate to the situation) Fi "standards"
so/sp & sx last: social PC tendency, doesn't understand human desires and sexuality
enneagram 5: does a lot of research, appeals to authority
I rarely feel alone. I rarely talk to anyone, yet in my head i have the most amazing, the most fantastic discussions with the people in my life. In real life, what most people talk about is several orders of magnitude lesser than their inner experiences. Most people never reveal the singularity of their subjective experience.
Maybe I should learn to explore other people's consciousness. Maybe I should aim for a real space between me and others. Instead of cultivating monologues and fantasies. It's hard, but the alternative to this seems to be madness. ~ lkdhf qkb
Life is soup. I'm fork