Your typing of forum members

[lavos]

i’ve heard of the inert/contact subtype but not the accepting/producing (“accepting/creative” as it says on the survey?) subtype. is there any meaningful difference between them?

Just another name to call them.

Inert - accepting - base - eg. SEE-Se
Contact - producing - creative (can be confused with DCNH) - eg. SEE-Fi

[seeking it]

it is possible that @Elmira is logical, as she self-reports behaviour not so likely for an ethical type (rarely sincerely laughs, smile is as if she is fighting it, does not feel compelled to influence the mood of an interaction). has a more formal, colder, less personable style of communication. somewhat more reminiscent of mine, Miss Messy's and Clarke's than the usual ethicist here.


with a typing thread + video she would get more and more qualified opinions - if her type is close to ESI, LSI for example, then this might not be an attractive prospect for her, because abundance of data for a more objective evaluation (Te) and outside perceptions of her personality and motivations (Ne) have less interest for this type

@Elmira seems ESI alright to me. Se subtype

[seeking it]

@seeking it

If you're sure of being Beta ST and just stuck between LSI-Se and SLE-Ti , find the function you use Fi or Ne

SLE-Ti use Ne very much , LSI-Se suppresses Ne's information and strongly reject it

LSI-Se uses Fi very much, SLE-Ti suppresses Fi's information and strongly reject it

I really am not sure, I do not look at myself in that way or if I try I cannot decide between these two (Ne and Fi).

I did find that I use Ne more readily in arguments etc. with LSI-Ti friend. He takes things personally faster than I do, too. He pulls up a wall sooner i.e. he said his opinions, he has nothing more to say. EDIT: Also he does not reject Ne aggressively though like I often do it. He just plain pays no attention to Ne, he has these very neatly sorted out opinions and that's all, I am not like that, I'm opinionated but ready to argue unlike him

As far as Fi I am very private and closed off, I try to see everything in an incredibly impersonal way, and I have incredibly delayed emotional reactions to some things. But I also have my social limits so I do not go too far with jokes and whatever because I can sense it could be "too much". I am not sure if I sense it via Fi limits/boundaries or Ti limits/boundaries

seeking it is most likely ethical

Lol alright thanks for the input. I could be anything but Ethical though. Sigh

suppression and rejection of information relating to both superego functions is not unusual, not just one.

That's exactly me, I reject both pretty hard. I get aggressive about Ne and I get really detached about Fi feelings

[on a peaceful hiatus]

PussyInASarcophagus - IEI

[Poptart]

PussyInASarcophagus - IEI

Now you’re just trolling

[maresnest]

Just another name to call them.

Inert - accepting - base - eg. SEE-Se
Contact - producing - creative (can be confused with DCNH) - eg. SEE-Fi

thanks, that’s what i assumed but the questionnaire made me think otherwise because they were both separately on there, and i was like, “did i miss something?”
i wonder why the questionnaire has both “inert/contact” and “accepting/producing” subtypes on there since it’s redundant

[youfloweryourfeast]

a lot of LSIs have that type of nose and small face

[youfloweryourfeast]

my father is LSE and once he came over and saw me writing about something to do with personalilty types when i first got into it. (idk what is was exactly since it was a long time ago), but he said "people have too many layers to fit into something like that"
once before i was obsessed with some weird conspiracy things and it was something to do with princess diana. he got really mad saying "that is not real why are you believing in these fake conspiracy things"
i dont even think he was dualized before because he used to be very cold and close minded, now he is more warm still he would probably never look too deply into socionics. i can speak to my eie mother about anything to do with socionics and how it applies to different people in our life. my dad is intellectual though and likes reading but more about real life things like nature or history.

[nifl]

@inumbra
IEI is more likely
his communication style is more like a Fe person - Fi types when they are annoyed are more passive-aggressive than openly scornful or ridiculing of their opponents. same with Lady Lunacy, who thinks she's a Fi base (probably ESE or EIE)
much categorisation into one category is just as much Ti as more varied categorisations. Ti = ''subjective'' logic: lines of reasoning, creation of logical categories, hierarchies etc.
problems with logical consistency is just more common for ethical types in general.

[on a peaceful hiatus]

I wish there were more types on this website, I really do. I also wish I had a more diverse gallery. I'm not here to appeal to others. I geniunly think almost everyone here has the same type. I don't get any benefits from claiming everyone here has the same type, on the contrary. imagine if Gulenko or Jack would type everyone that sends them a video as the same type. their business model would vanish, but I'm not influenced by monetary gain. I just make neutral observations. it is what it is.

[Beautiful sky]

@Subteigh EII AND I owe you a personal apology

[trick]

Can someone tell me what my type is?

[on a peaceful hiatus]

Can someone tell me what my type is?

You seem Ni base from your introduction. Nice Lain pics. Videos could help but not everyone is open to doing that. I'm leaning towards IEI for you

[nifl]

Can someone tell me what my type is?

make a typing video

[trick]

What's a typing video? Is that a video in which I show myself? I won't do that - so unfortunately that's not an option.

[Beautiful sky]

What's a typing video? Is that a video in which I show myself? I won't do that - so unfortunately that's not an option.

You don’t have to do a video to get your type. You do have to start viewing my videos and trying to understand the functions and what they mean

[Beautiful sky]

What's a typing video? Is that a video in which I show myself? I won't do that - so unfortunately that's not an option.

So far I’ve only made Ne-Ni
Fe-Fi

https://youtu.be/TEGUpHDd3FQ

https://youtu.be/kR1WvXgqfGU

Understand which one you use constantly ask people around you which ones show up and ask many people including your parents

[BrainlessSquid]

I just came here to say that @Tallmo is INTj
He's always classifying information and correcting people's incorrect logic, has a directive TJ approach to people, high focus on Ni, clearly introverted, clearly thinker, intuition is more prominent but always subjected to his judging, always getting to logical conclusions not necessarily fully supported by sensory and intuitive background, relies too much on theory, because it's the most valued aspect of interpretation of data.

You're welcome

[Beautiful sky]

I just came here to say that @Tallmo is INTj
He's always classifying information and correcting people's incorrect logic, has a directive TJ approach to people, high focus on Ni, clearly introverted, clearly thinker, intuition is more prominent but always subjected to his judging, always getting to logical conclusions not necessarily fully supported by sensory and intuitive background, relies too much on theory, because it's the most valued aspect of interpretation of data.

You're welcome

Ok so now why wouldn’t you consider how Ti in Tallmo would work as an ISFp

[Beautiful sky]

You seem Ni base from your introduction. Nice Lain pics. Videos could help but not everyone is open to doing that. I'm leaning towards IEI for you

Alive is definitely LII
Quick to make that Judgement lol

[BrainlessSquid]

Ok so now why wouldn’t you consider how Ti in Tallmo would work as an ISFp

I've tried that in the past, but the pieces didn't fit together, I knew there was something wrong. Now I know

[BrainlessSquid]

Alive is definitely LII
Quick to make that Judgement lol

Alive is definitely Ti lead and seems Ne valuing even though he narrows everything down to one single possibility lol

[Beautiful sky]

I've tried that in the past, but the pieces didn't fit together, I knew there was something wrong. Now I know

In comparison Tallimo doesn’t make Judgements right away but mulls over information for a while

[on a peaceful hiatus]

No one here is a sensing type

[Beautiful sky]

No one here is a sensing type

Lol

[BrainlessSquid]

In comparison Tallimo doesn’t make Judgements right away but mulls over information for a while

He is older I guess, also with high focus on Ni, so naturally a highly introspective person. His experience might have told him how dangerous it can be to make such assumptions without too much pondering and analysis

[Beautiful sky]

He is older I guess, also with high focus on Ni, so naturally a highly introspective person. His experience might have told him how dangerous it can be to make such assumptions without too much pondering and analysis

High focus you mean role function Ni?

[BrainlessSquid]

High focus you mean role function Ni?

No, it's not a role function at all

[Tallmo]

I just came here to say that @Tallmo is INTj
He's always classifying information and correcting people's incorrect logic, has a directive TJ approach to people, high focus on Ni, clearly introverted, clearly thinker, intuition is more prominent but always subjected to his judging, always getting to logical conclusions not necessarily fully supported by sensory and intuitive background, relies too much on theory, because it's the most valued aspect of interpretation of data.

You're welcome

Thanks, I'm flattered. But unfortunately I am just a SEI with Ti mobilizing and Normalizing subtype who has gone through normal western analytical education (I have a masters degree in languages, it took me 10 years to get it). And studied typology for the last 15 years.

[Beautiful sky]

No, it's not a role function at all

Why not? Did I say roll function geez I mean activation

[on a peaceful hiatus]

(I have a masters degree in languages

do you remember how I mentioned a couple of times that Ni+ has a potential interest in languages? I do.

[pixie dreams]

What's a typing video? Is that a video in which I show myself? I won't do that - so unfortunately that's not an option.

Right? I said the same thing. I don't understand why socionists want videos or pictures to type people, like bitch that seems so weird. I'm definitely not sending my personal info like that on a sketchy website full crazies and weirdos.

[pixie dreams]

I wonder if @Alive is EII. Noticing the image focus of visitors here and the Ni-ish lean while actually being secretly critical of it in an Fi way?

/hides/

I think it's quite common for male EII to mistype LII.

(Disclaimer: socionics is a model, not a clear depiction of reality.)

But! It just seems odd to me that a 4d Ti would think most people here are the same type. So little differentiation and categorization, and my 2d Ti smells a rat, a disavower of the Ti, who scoffs upon it, a rat with a head cold!

Usually the LII is annoying due to their excessive categorization and ability to tell this from that from this from that. It's precious when they say everything is the same, bc gosh, in that case it really might be. But that is not the case here, so... What is left?

Dude your brain... You're on a different level. I WAS THINKING THE SAME THING WTH.

Alive being EII makes so much sense because really he's making Fi associations and not Ti cateforizations. You noticed that?

And personally from what I've seen Alive likes to play victim or helpless when in reality that's far from the truth. Sure it's silly to get mad over typing everyone IEI but Alive deliberately seeks out conflict with people and acts oblivious and helpless to it, when it's really his own fault.

[Beautiful sky]

do you remember how I mentioned a couple of times that Ni+ has a potential interest in languages? I do.

That’s pure Ti of you because Ti is and I will quote for others:

“ I would say it's a very specialized and personal method of evaluating problems and potential solutions. It's weighing different options and selecting the one that seems to offer the most benefits with the least expenditure of effort or danger.”

So you took what someone else said and applied it to your self

[on a peaceful hiatus]

Right? I said the same thing. I don't understand why socionists want videos or pictures to type people, like bitch that seems so weird. I'm definitely not sending my personal info like that on a sketchy website full crazies and weirdos.

you don't have to. nobody is forcing you to upload a video. people ask for their type, and a video provides more info than a bunch of words. you have Ni paranoia, imagining all the potential downsides of it. as for your EII post, I have no idea what your thought processes were when you wrote that. you use words like Fi or Ti but I'm not sure if you know what they mean.

[pixie dreams]

Ouch my fee fees.˖♡ It'll be okay Alive uwu

[Beautiful sky]

This series is also great at explaining the functions. Be sure to scroll through the comments section too since lots of knowledgeable people contribute their insights.

https://youtu.be/4qZ7mwbZXT4

[nifl]

I just came here to say that @Tallmo is INTj
He's always classifying information and correcting people's incorrect logic, has a directive TJ approach to people, high focus on Ni, clearly introverted, clearly thinker, intuition is more prominent but always subjected to his judging, always getting to logical conclusions not necessarily fully supported by sensory and intuitive background, relies too much on theory, because it's the most valued aspect of interpretation of data.

You're welcome

logic is more likely, yes
LSI is my hunch atm

@trick @Sahira
a typing video is by far the best option, because there is higher quality of data and more varied forms of it - how you act, what you say etc. reading a questionnaire in that can be good, but a questionnaire is quite useless on its own, mostly because most people who want to get typed here lurk and read about the theory before posting, which means that self-reports are often consciously or unconsciously censored or manipulated according to what type the typee thinks is most attractive/correct.
paranoia about consequences of/general uneasiness about showing yourself on here is more likely for introverts, non-valued Ne, sensors. most of us are just interested in socionics, promise

Sahira talks more like an ethical type, most likely Fe. the profile pic leads the thoughts to ESE/SEI

[Tallmo]

logic is more likely, yes
LSI is my hunch atm

Yes, based on what I write here, Ti base would maybe make sense. I've said it before. It's just funny for me to see how people make conclusions based on a very limited sample, a certain persona that one develops over time when talking about typology. We adapt and develop, and this is hard to take into account in the forum, we don't know each other well enough and people are also often quite young in the forum and take the descriptions very literally. The result is a typing that doesn't make sense at all, if you knew the person in real life. What seems like strong thinking is actually weak valued thinking applied on experience or learned material. Or subtype thinking. It's also easier to fool people in text, because vague, weak ideas can be worked upon so that they look convincing and strong. When the text is read it sounds natural, as if it was produced by a different base type.

Then there is the talk about Ni. @Megatrop says that I have "high focus on Ni". This is not true. He seems to link Ni to certain themes, talking about certain things that he feels is "Ni". But talking about psychology or spirituality is not necessarily Ni, although it can be it. Ni is very abstract, something like "philosophical intuition". Most subjects can be talked about in many ways, using different functions, and this also goes for psychology and spirituality.

One more thing. SEI is a type that often has trouble putting his ego functions to use. Some can do it, but many get stuck. Instead they might learn to go in a more Ti direction. They become slightly neurotic, forgetting their own type. Especially for men it can be a way forward, although it's also uncomfortable. So there are reasons for why some people appear to be another type.

[on a peaceful hiatus]

Megatrop sees that you are clearly interested in theoretical, abstract concepts, which is not what sensing types are about. In my opinion, you could be presented with an objective test that tells you you are not SEI and you would still think it would be wrong. You have committed yourself to your self-typing, like so many people here. No alternative is valid, because you have ignoring Ne.

Almost no one here values Ne. Having spend so much time on this website, I'm very sure about that.