Also I find it funny someone would get defensive about getting someone else's opinion of their type given that the same person is also the OP of this thread...
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Uneducated guess
https://www.urbandictionary.com/defi...ucated%20guess
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@Wavebury: I don't think it's worth getting into a debate. She is very rigid and has a short temper. Likely N-sub
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
If I may, that maybe true for a six years old LII ! Our weak functions evolve through time and by the time one has achieved adulthood he will acquire enough experience in those weak functions to well... function in society otherwise one might suffer from a form of handicap (cognitive development disorder) and that would be detected by the caregivers (most likely) and/or the school system. Teachers are good in detecting both mental retardation and precocity. Imho, It's not serious to assume that the PolR or suggestive are kinda like the "autistic" functions of a TIM ad vitam, that would be a literalistic interpretation of the Model (snapshot chart/ Organigram) applied to real People.![]()
This one is interesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUxfLyrbv5k
I was like well... what is so special without translation.
Then I read the translated commented section
LOL. Yes. Very much so.Fear, disgust and contempt are portrayed inadequately or hardly at all.
Another SLI pokemon
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
NO Private messages, please. Use Discord instead.
The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule".
DCNH as far as I interpret it is more how you go through life and respond to intense situations. N-subs build their environments around rules to minimize potential danger while D and C don't care much about caution. everyone can LARP as a D-Sub online.
@Beautiful sky, what is the difference between "confirm" and "confirm final"? https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-forum-members
Is it the same as between an educated and uneducated guess?
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
In the comments back in Gulenko's personal account on YT someone mentioned someone else's account, so I went there and managed to dig out two more videos.
EIE - "N or H sub" by G.'s own words
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WT5-_YgsECg&t
ILI, apparently
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQTnIRZgo_k
It doesn't say what type for her on G's channel but I suspect IEI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKwqvZNwAWQ&t=
Sicuramente cercherai il significato di questo.
Weird. I thought out of all those examples on G’s personal channel, She would be the IEI. Then I put on the subtitles and put them on English translate, and the things she says about herself doesn’t match with IEI, imo. Very confusing. Someone Halp!I’m confused!
But really, now idk. :|
Well, it's pretty rash to categorize someone in a sociotype based only on what the person says in a 2 minute video badly translated. Those videos are ment to look at the temperament. She is definetly Dynamic:Receptive-Adaptive, among these I think IEI is a good fit; she shows a good amount of +E.
You shouldn't compare her to yourself. Since neither she nor you are the general representant of an IEI.
oh I wasn’t comparing, or being rash. I just mean the things she said there in that video clashed with what I know of types from reading G’s typology book. I’m sure these examples are meant to be harder. maybe they are meant for students to guess or something. I watched the other ones, too, and it all seems to be them talking about jobs and their age, and values, and no answer on type. It’s almost like a game. Some are practically shouting out quotes from his book under certain types and relating it to their lives.
She could be IEI, still.
@Wavebury seems to have some insider knowledge. What do you know/think of this one?
LIE-N?
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
NO Private messages, please. Use Discord instead.
I do not get all the content. Translation is not coherent.But subtype leaves very little room for guessing. LSI seems OK too. I d not quite get what he talks about his weaknesses and strengths. Actually, I looked at it very oppositely at first due to translation.
Originally Posted by LSI
Last edited by mr provocateur; 02-01-2023 at 05:36 PM.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
NO Private messages, please. Use Discord instead.
Yes, the translation is not good. At this point I just select a bunch of translated words that correspond phonetically to what the person is saying! It's all about energy anyway ahahah !
Edit : Updated my post so that the quote corresponds to Sanguine Miasma Updated post.
ESE found
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
NO Private messages, please. Use Discord instead.
I actually don't know, and this is what Google translate spat out when I ran the text in the description of the video through it:
So I'm guessing it's some kind of exercise for his students?What sociotype is Victoria? Pay attention to the movement of the eyes, body movements, the nature of the smile and microexpressions.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
NO Private messages, please. Use Discord instead.
SLE
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
NO Private messages, please. Use Discord instead.
I realize the description of the other video (of the EII woman) also doesn't say what type she is, it was a student of SHS who said on a Discord server that she had gotten typed EII. @Aster that was my insider knowledge.![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ohmZOHcfk0 This one I know got ESI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHpVPMusCps And this one got LIE
I don't know their subtypes though, nor the types of the other people, sorry.![]()
Tatiana (ESI) reminds me @Adam Strange 's famous ESI Interior designer (and girlfriend) ! Same type same Profession (maybe they look alike too !) ! She has a very charming and warm energy too ! That video is in SHS site since a while and I was curious about her type without actively searching for the answer though. Mystery solved, thank you for that !
sol - IEI-N
nifl - IEI-N
These two are obvious identicals. I wonder how they will interact with each other
Beautiful Sky - IEI-N
plz send some creative subtypes
Also Adam Strange is in my opinion an IEI
more correct would be:
Sol - EIE
nifl - IEI
i followed his example in using basic theory (especially ITR, when i observed the effects IRL and the significant concordance with the theory) and VI when considering my type and after reading his advice; we have mirror types : therefore the similarity
Alive, logical types generally have good sensibilities for assessments of facts and categorisation in order to not throw conflictors and superegos of IEI into that type, especially with the abundance of data at your hands. furthermore these differences in people are perceived clearly and their importance is not rejected with Ne in LII.
as seen on your picture you do not have the visage of LII, either - it looks irrational. this was already evident in your video with WellArmedCat
Last edited by nifl; 02-09-2023 at 05:22 AM.
Nah, you two are too similar to be different types. Maybe it's not so obvious to you, but I think everyone else notices it. It's like that example of ben shapiro and brett cooper who are also behaving in very similar ways.