Im shipping Sol and Myst as new couple what do u guys think
Im shipping Sol and Myst as new couple what do u guys think
I think she would kill him.
no kill me first
"WELL I'M SORRY THAT I LIKE TO HAVE OPEN COMMUNICATION IN MY RELATIONSHIPS" - Galen 2k13
All the gifs, the pictures... it seems Se valuing to me. Your focus is on the aesthetic. Those pictures also tend to have sharp and bright colors. To my eyes these images come across as "heavy". It's not something calm and warming. I don't think an Ne lead would place so much value into these things. In my head Ne is the function that constantly seeks for something new, totally different. You seem to be very focused on these korean (?) dudes. But you really don't give me Se lead vibes. It may just be the role. But for the moment I think EIE>IEE.
Truthfully, it’s hard to see you guys together. You like Introverts, and @Chae is anything but introverted.
She also seems very diplomatic, while you are less so.
Just hard to see it.
> She also seems very diplomatic, while you are less so.
I suspect the physical abbility to touch me by other means would influence on her tactics.
I lOve wAtEr
And not only "dudes" (what an ugly word) - girls, too. Pay more attention to my gayness
Not Se lead, but Se role, but also EIE? Make up your miiiind. What I question is: where's the ? I don't meet many criteria for the element. Like I don't plan or look ahead for more than an hour And my interest in Aylenesque esoterics only comes from the fact that it looks good and makes decent sense to me. Aesthetic back and forth. Obviously, I'm a 3, surface counts, and I'll make sure you won't overlook me. Make what you want out of that. I take every typing that has "vibes" in it with a grain of salt anyways you know what I'm saying
Last edited by Chae; 03-13-2018 at 01:26 PM.
Cholerico-sanguinic temperament as well, by the way.
If you identify yourself with sanguinic-choleric temperament and IEI, then you are most likely the Fe-subtype. The Ni-subtype is very unlikely sanguinic or choleric.
I don't identify myself with any. What i've said so far was pure shitposting. I think the four temperaments system is pretty silly, but it's similar to buzzfeed quizzes: Nice to have around when you'd like something to bash and/or identify with for the fun of it.
It's difficult for me to pay attention to such things. I tend to forget personal informations like country of origin, name and sexual orientation. Now that I think about it there's a lot of members of which I don't know the gender, for example Myst and Winnie.And not only "dudes" (what an ugly word) - girls, too. Pay more attention to my gayness
Yup, not Se lead. Se leads are pretty easy to spot, and you're not one of them. I think Se is a big part of you. It's pretty clear you're one of the most extraverted people here on the forum, and it's not only explainable with the lead function. It's the product of two extraverted functions combined. EIEs got unconscious Ti and semiconscious Se. Jungian disciples like von Franz clearly explain the influence of the inferior function. It's true there are some ambiguities, and there's much less material from "experts", but since I give great relevance to the polarity of the functions (no, I don't call them IE. Jung called them functions, and since I'm not a blind socionics follower, I call them that way) I give great value to the HA too. If your creative function is Ni, it means that Se will obviously leak into conscience on various occasions. Very extraverted people just have a stronger HA, and the same happens with very introverted people. The creative kind of gets bypassed.Not Se lead, but Se role, but also EIE? Make up your miiiind.
Anyways, what I get from you is an high energy level, and a great sharing of emotions, personal evaluations, pictures etc etc. I just think your feeling is higher than your intuition. But I don't exclude IEE. I still think it's the second most likely (and it's very likely). I say that for me it's 60% EIE and 40% IEE.
And I understand your despise for typings based on "vibes", but it's just a word I use for "all the impressions I got from you". And of course, I elaborate these impressions inside my head. But I understand your irritation. I get irritated too when people don't explain their reasoning.
^ Se described this way could apply to several types out of context. I am not even challenging your typing of Chae since typing is very subjective. I am just wondering what the rational behind the part in bold actually is. Why would creative be bypassed?Se as Mobilizing Function
The individual tends to feel capable of achieving his goals, but hesitates on whether the path he is choosing is the right one. In these cases he needs to feel the support of others in order to be motivated to finally choose. He likes to be involved in competitive and challenging endeavors and to see his will and personal power develop as he overcomes obstacles together with other people. However, he depends on others to provide the gusto and motivation for these endeavors.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Yes, it's an MBTI concept. As I said, I don't firmly believe in singular systems. Model A is too rigid and doesn't give great explainings for unhealthy people. I prefer Grant's stack, and I believe in theories like loops and grips. What socionics has over MBTI is the stuff that they got from Jung without ruining it without a reason. It's right Pi-leads are p. Plus, socionics got rid of ridiculous stereotypes, and the functions ain't uniquely explained like "Si=memory".
New Additions: TheHotelAmbush, Soupman, Falsehope, Zero, Hitta, Avebury, Anglas, Strangeling, Nanashi
Revision: Totalize (Se/Fi > Te/Ni)
ILE-Ti: Myst, Transkar, LuchoisLurking, JWC3, MadCity, Troll NR 007, Falsehope
ILE-Ne: Geneiouws, Lagerdemon, Cubazoan, Nickelslick, Hitta
ESE-Fi: Chipsnunderwear, Suz, Inumbra, Subteigh, Kalinoche, FlutteringShyx
ESE-Si: Mu4, Wacey, Xerx, Esaman, KrigtheViking, Hacim
LII-Ti: N0ki, Muddy, Reactance, User Name, Bertrand
LII-Ne: Kimuchi/kimu, Zero
SEI-Si: johannesbloem, chriscorey, the whole English
SEI-Fe: BnD, crazedrat, dinky, Neokortex, Pallas Athena
SLE-Se: herzy, mercutio, ananke, idontgiveaf
SLE-Ti: agee, kill4me
LSI-Se: Spider, Missbabydoll, Pole, Aramas
IEI-Fe: Allie, Pink, SisofNight, Cassandra, Fay, Summer Princess
IEI-Ni: Starfall/Fox, Glam, Elina, Strrrng, Velvet, Penny Dreadful
EIE-Ni: Gilly, Darya, Bain, Sarinana
SEE-Se: Woofwoofl, Handjob, Number9Large
SEE-Fi: Lucas, Aquagraph, Chae, Vogue Paris, Totalize
LIE-Ni: Ineffable, Moonraker, Avebury
LIE-Te: Ashton, FDG, Expat, Invisiblehim, Narc, Anglas
ESI-Se: DiscoJoe, EJArendee, Jet City Woman, MisterNi, Scarletluxx, Amber/Rosewood, Strangeling
ESI-Fi: Lungs, Golden, Ouronis, Radio, Suedehead, Galen, Kore/Persephone, Delilah, the Locust
ILI-Ni: Scapegrace, Korpsey, Krieger, Cpig, InvisibleJim
ILI-Te: Marie, Mensupermateriam, Aestrivex, Crispy, Soupman
SLI-Si: Words, Stray, Scarper
SLI-Te: kim, daft punk, directorabbie, pookie, Jessica, may, supremacist
LSE-Te: Absurd, JimBean
LSE-Si: William, JackOliverAaron/Echidna1000, BurningIce, Timmy, Smilingeyes, Laurie’s Crusader
IEE-Ne: Elizathomason, UDP, Sapphire, Syrup De Gem, Pinoline, Azbestos, Nanashi
IEE-Fi: Finale, Airman/airborne, Adam Strange, Prince Andrei, Niffer
EII-Ne: Aylen, Epheme, Wasp
EII-Fi: Maritsa/beautiful sky, silke, sol, zero, mikemex, IBTL, Contra, Tela/Arachne, Olimpia, TheHotelAmbush
Last edited by Kill4Me; 03-23-2018 at 12:40 AM.
Last edited by Muddy; 03-16-2018 at 03:15 AM.
HotelAmbush (EII) supervises Myst (ILE) on the Se PoLR of INFj's and INTj's thread:
It's called a "model" and can be checked experimentally on your behavior prognosis, while before staying as hypothesis.
Your strange not understanding of what Socionics is used for may relate to your possible weak nonvalued Ne. Such types are more nervous when other people think about their internal motives. So being on this forum it would be more comfortable for you to think it's like about other.
> It doesn't give Ni like that.
It's Ne. And it's what psychology does indirectly or directly. The last, as you may use N methods for your opinion too, like in nonverbal typing.