Page 157 of 167 FirstFirst ... 57107147153154155156157158159160161 ... LastLast
Results 6,241 to 6,280 of 6676

Thread: Your typing of forum members

  1. #6241
    Manatroid92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Location
    Australia
    TIM
    INxp
    Posts
    380
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Not going to say these are outright wrong or not helpful, but they're not necessarily accurate for establishing a strict type.
    There's also an issues of self-reporting being less reliable than other factors (people might say they're logical, but are actually quite ethical even if they don't realise it).

    I think they are helpful to narrow-down on quadra or club, though.
    For example, someone might get results that indicate they're IEE, when in actuality they are an EIE and don't know it. However, from the results you can probably assume they are likely intuitive, ethical, and/or aristocratic, so that gives you a decent chunk of types to think about.

    Also, determining introversion/extroversion in Socionics is really hard too, most especially when it comes to self-reported tests, because E/I information elements are not about whether you're shy or outgoing.
    And rational/irrational is hard to really judge too, unless you happen to be a very close representation to stereotype.


    That all being said, it's good that the results from both give other possibilities of what your type could be in the results.

  2. #6242
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    TIM
    LIE-Ni
    Posts
    1,280
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Manatroid92 View Post
    Not going to say these are outright wrong or not helpful, but they're not necessarily accurate for establishing a strict type.
    There's also an issues of self-reporting being less reliable than other factors (people might say they're logical, but are actually quite ethical even if they don't realise it).

    I think they are helpful to narrow-down on quadra or club, though.
    For example, someone might get results that indicate they're IEE, when in actuality they are an EIE and don't know it. However, from the results you can probably assume they are likely intuitive, ethical, and/or aristocratic, so that gives you a decent chunk of types to think about.

    Also, determining introversion/extroversion in Socionics is really hard too, most especially when it comes to self-reported tests, because E/I information elements are not about whether you're shy or outgoing.
    And rational/irrational is hard to really judge too, unless you happen to be a very close representation to stereotype.


    That all being said, it's good that the results from both give other possibilities of what your type could be in the results.
    Yes it's true, but I am assuming some research would go in hand with the test result. With a bit of narrowing down and eliminating options, very likely you can find out your type. Tests are certainly helpful (if they are well crafted , that is), the only time where they might miss is if the person taking the test doesn't respond honestly (either consciously or subsconciously), or they have self-identity issues. For 95% of people, they will work and give them them good clues towards their real type, sometimes the type outright even (in the case of the Sociotype test). I'm judging based on my experience with them, and what I've observed of results in threads where the users have posted them. It could also be that I don't like the Ti method of analyzing questionnaires, but I do like the Te method of evaluating evidence of a person's presentation and how it lines up with Socionics workings.

  3. #6243
    What's the purpose of SEI? Tallmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Finland
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    3,858
    Mentioned
    289 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Manatroid92 View Post
    Also, determining introversion/extroversion in Socionics is really hard too, most especially when it comes to self-reported tests, because E/I information elements are not about whether you're shy or outgoing.
    They actually are, as far as the person has a developed type and is a "pure" type without accentuations or contradicting subtypes etc.

    Typically an introvert is insecure about the world and has complexes about it. An extravert is insecure about his inner world. If the conscious type gets over-developed this becomes extreme.

    In reality things are more complicated but the type itself is definitely contributing to introverts and extraverts behaving just as you described. But yes, tests don't work.
    The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.

    (Jung on Si)

  4. #6244
    Manatroid92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Location
    Australia
    TIM
    INxp
    Posts
    380
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tallmo View Post
    They actually are, as far as the person has a developed type and is a "pure" type without accentuations or contradicting subtypes etc.

    Typically an introvert is insecure about the world and has complexes about it. An extravert is insecure about his inner world. If the conscious type gets over-developed this becomes extreme.

    In reality things are more complicated but the type itself is definitely contributing to introverts and extraverts behaving just as you described. But yes, tests don't work.
    Yeah, factors like these are more obvious traits of the respective types. But I think how people perceive themselves as being more introverted than extroverted can be tricky, like some people can be more 'introverted' compared to their social circle, but they are still extroverted types. Subtypes may come into play here, too.

    And insecurity about one's inner-world is one of those distinctions that's a bit nebulous as a means of self-assessment. It's a difference between I and E, sure, but I find it's hard to really quantify. If it was a quality that would be easy to measure in oneself, it would be very easy for someone to determine if they really are introverted or not, and not just shy/socially anxious or something.

  5. #6245
    H.H.W
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Posts
    1,020
    Mentioned
    56 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    When I go through life I can't say that I have made that observation. Why is it that I feel comfortable expressing my interest in socionics to a random stranger I type as intuitive and they are interested while sensing types don't care about it at all or change the topic after a few sentences or I can't even imagine how I would introduce it? Stereotypes don't come from nowhere.
    Don't forget that you live in Germany

    Germans are generally more disciplined , more strict and serious than other peoples , I doubt that someone there would waste his time reading things about Socionics

    Germany is not the whole world

  6. #6246
    Traversing The Darkness Lady Lunacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Hell
    Posts
    4,017
    Mentioned
    192 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lavos View Post
    I don't understand why there is such a fuss with typings, when we actually have two very good tests that can tell a person's type with great accuracy. Now what needs to be invented is an AI that analyzes photos of people and gives the type (which I think soon could be possible). The only things that don't lie are tests (unles the taker games them) and VI. Especially VI. The rest... Are just Ti's of people and just their opinions (mostly).
    I VI differently than I test. Explain.
    ⊹˳˚ ☾ ˚˳⊹
    xᴇɴᴏᴘʜɪʟᴇ, ʟɪɴɢᴜᴀᴘʜɪʟᴇ, ᴄᴜʟᴛᴜʀᴇ ʙᴜғғ, ᴘsʏᴄʜᴏʟᴏɢʏ/sᴏᴄɪᴏʟᴏɢʏ ɴᴇʀᴅ, ᴀɴᴅ ᴀsᴘɪʀɪɴɢ ᴘᴏʟʏɢʟᴏᴛ.

  7. #6247
    Traversing The Darkness Lady Lunacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Hell
    Posts
    4,017
    Mentioned
    192 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pregnantman View Post
    dr phil-worthy advice. only a fool would turn down this bargain of a deal
    Dr Phil is a narcissistic asshole who I'm shocked understands his alphabet. I'm also not offering any deals, I'm saying "be respectful and don't get moderated when you reply to me, or continue as you are and get moderated when you reply to me." It's not a deal, it's consequences for his own actions. It's me not putting up with peoples' shit. It's called commanding respect, which first comes from having self-respect. You should learn it sometime.
    Last edited by Lady Lunacy; 10-08-2022 at 04:28 PM.
    ⊹˳˚ ☾ ˚˳⊹
    xᴇɴᴏᴘʜɪʟᴇ, ʟɪɴɢᴜᴀᴘʜɪʟᴇ, ᴄᴜʟᴛᴜʀᴇ ʙᴜғғ, ᴘsʏᴄʜᴏʟᴏɢʏ/sᴏᴄɪᴏʟᴏɢʏ ɴᴇʀᴅ, ᴀɴᴅ ᴀsᴘɪʀɪɴɢ ᴘᴏʟʏɢʟᴏᴛ.

  8. #6248
    Traversing The Darkness Lady Lunacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Hell
    Posts
    4,017
    Mentioned
    192 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aster View Post
    Oh well shit I didn’t really mean you as a mean girl. I’m just saying it seems something like a mean girl would say as in the movie mean girls
    Ahh. Yeah, I can't relate to that type of mean girl. Those are the kinds of bitches I've always put in their place all my life, defended others from, etc. Bullies. So, if two has a mean girl side, no wonder she hates me.

    Honestly, it's good to be hated sometimes. If no one hates you, you're doing something wrong.
    ⊹˳˚ ☾ ˚˳⊹
    xᴇɴᴏᴘʜɪʟᴇ, ʟɪɴɢᴜᴀᴘʜɪʟᴇ, ᴄᴜʟᴛᴜʀᴇ ʙᴜғғ, ᴘsʏᴄʜᴏʟᴏɢʏ/sᴏᴄɪᴏʟᴏɢʏ ɴᴇʀᴅ, ᴀɴᴅ ᴀsᴘɪʀɪɴɢ ᴘᴏʟʏɢʟᴏᴛ.

  9. #6249

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    Memo Ibarra
    Posts
    799
    Mentioned
    123 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)

    Default

    How in the actual hell is @Lady Lioness even remotely Beta NF? Literally, everything she says comes from a Fi standpoint, first and foremost. She prioritizes her own values and judgment over the group, and she doesn't care if she "upsets" the atmosphere (Fe ignoring) to get to the point concisely and say what needs to be said (Se creative). She also seems to care a great deal about protecting herself from harmful relations (-Fi, Gamma Quadra). I have never actually seen her explore alternative possibilities either, she's set on doing things her way (Ne PoLR). Never saw her use Demonstrative Ne, nor Fe or Ni well. I don't actually understand, functionally how you all see it in her.

  10. #6250
    Traversing The Darkness Lady Lunacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Hell
    Posts
    4,017
    Mentioned
    192 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Dane Horlock View Post
    How in the actual hell is @Lady Lioness even remotely Beta NF? Literally, everything she says comes from a Fi standpoint, first and foremost. She prioritizes her own values and judgment over the group, and she doesn't care if she "upsets" the atmosphere (Fe ignoring) to get to the point concisely and say what needs to be said (Se creative). She also seems to care a great deal about protecting herself from harmful relations (-Fi, Gamma Quadra). I have never actually seen her explore alternative possibilities either, she's set on doing things her way (Ne PoLR). Never saw her use Demonstrative Ne, nor Fe or Ni well.
    Accurate as fuck. Lol. I'm this much of an ESI meme. Although I'm a bit blind in the "doesn't explore alternatives" area. Not sure what alternatives I'm not exploring.

    I don't actually understand, functionally how you all see it in her.
    Aster is accurate about how I am, but I think she just mixes up types of passion, which is actually really easy to do and understandable.
    ⊹˳˚ ☾ ˚˳⊹
    xᴇɴᴏᴘʜɪʟᴇ, ʟɪɴɢᴜᴀᴘʜɪʟᴇ, ᴄᴜʟᴛᴜʀᴇ ʙᴜғғ, ᴘsʏᴄʜᴏʟᴏɢʏ/sᴏᴄɪᴏʟᴏɢʏ ɴᴇʀᴅ, ᴀɴᴅ ᴀsᴘɪʀɪɴɢ ᴘᴏʟʏɢʟᴏᴛ.

  11. #6251

    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    TIM
    SLI
    Posts
    653
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Lady Lioness
    >Avoid, avoid, avoid, then blow up and overreact hardcore.
    this is generally an introvert thing, IME - conflict in the Se sense is related materials, physical things, power, control of resources
    also superego functions are the most painful, so strange behaviour is most usual in those areas

    types are stereotypical, it's the only way to communicate about tendencies in people. when a person claims something about a type, they don't mean that everyone of that type conforms to that behaviour (hopefully). they are merely collections of, on average, more usual behaviour, not absolutes, for a specific type (such as Fi types being more concerned with their likes/dislikes than other types on average). everyone diverges from the descriptions to some degree, some more, some less. the type a person has is just what description they match with the most. notwithstanding that socionics itself is speculative and may be wrong about many things.

  12. #6252
    In unforgiving night God came Vex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Bakery
    TIM
    IEI-CN™
    Posts
    578
    Mentioned
    97 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Your typing of forum members

    I’m gonna stir the pot too and say Lady Lioness is like, EIE. And also cp 6.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    IEI-C 9w8 952
    I am being cancelled. For being so sexy and fun and intelligent and hot.

    BORN TO TYPE
    WORLD IS A SOCIONIKA
    心理学 Type Em All 1991
    I am jung fan

    410,757,864,530 PEOPLE TYPED




  13. #6253

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    Memo Ibarra
    Posts
    799
    Mentioned
    123 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lady Lioness View Post
    Accurate as fuck. Lol. I'm this much of an ESI meme. Although I'm a bit blind in the "doesn't explore alternatives" area. Not sure what alternatives I'm not exploring.
    I should rephrase that to mean that you don't seem like a 'what if?' person; someone who explores multiple options for the sake of it and just sticks to the relevant ones. I've never seen you try and push the boundaries of what is realistically possible, potentially with your thought. You keep it realistic, and don't explore overly complex ideas, and blow them out of proportion. You're decisive, and you know what you want and you explore your options within that realm.


    Aster is accurate about how I am, but I think she just mixes up types of passion, which is actually really easy to do and understandable.
    Yeah, and I also think that she relies on vibes too much when typing people, and not so much the theory of functionality. Or how someone actually reacts in a given situation in the context of socionics and how it works. She may intuitively be right about people, yes, but not always in the context of the functions and the types on this forum.

  14. #6254

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    2,906
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think the differences in perception of the type of @Lady Lioness ultimatively comes from the school or research you follow in socionics. She has read different sources. @Aster, @Pirouette and me simply follow Gulenko's school of thought about the types, and he portrays Beta as the warrior quadra full of passionate emotions. he even symbolizes this quadra with two knights on the front page of his website:

    https://socioniks.net/

    Gamma on the other hand is symbolized with capitalistic skyscrapers. he views Beta as youthful, passionate people (and if you are denying that Lady is not a passionate person you are denying reality imo) that fight against all odds for a goal that is difficult to achieve, while Gamma is characterized as pragmatic, egoistic, dispasionate, efficiency-driven and oriented towards material gain. this youthful spirit that Gulenko writes about is observable in many works of art



    so it's basically just a difference in perspective that cannot really be brigded. you either trust in gulenko's school or follow a different system
    the majority of people who browse this site are IEI. intuition of time is the function that is interested in the psychological state of human beings. typology is a field dominated by INxx, especially IEI.

  15. #6255
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    TIM
    LIE-Ni
    Posts
    1,280
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lady Lioness View Post
    I VI differently than I test. Explain.
    VI takes precedence. Among the test results, there should be one that you VI as. That would be your type.

  16. #6256
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    TIM
    LIE-Ni
    Posts
    1,280
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    I think the differences in perception of the type of @Lady Lioness ultimatively comes from the school or research you follow in socionics. She has read different sources. @Aster, @Pirouette and me simply follow Gulenko's school of thought about the types, and he portrays Beta as the warrior quadra full of passionate emotions. he even symbolizes this quadra with two knights on the front page of his website:

    https://socioniks.net/

    Gamma on the other hand is symbolized with capitalistic skyscrapers. he views Beta as youthful, passionate people (and if you are denying that Lady is not a passionate person you are denying reality imo) that fight against all odds for a goal that is difficult to achieve, while Gamma is characterized as pragmatic, egoistic, dispasionate, efficiency-driven and oriented towards material gain. this youthful spirit that Gulenko writes about is observable in many works of art



    so it's basically just a difference in perspective that cannot really be brigded. you either trust in gulenko's school or follow a different system
    The views about the quadras are biased. Made by alpha NT's, who are not good at analyzing people but inanimate objects, came up with those.They are stereotypes. Gamma in particular is the most misunderstood quadra (understandable as well since it's the opposite quadra of the alpha NT's who write those descriptions). I noticed this bias very soon when I came to Socionics. Wonder why other people don't notice. I guess some gammas probably notice it too, but they don't say anything it seems

  17. #6257

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    2,906
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lavos View Post
    The views about the quadras are biased. Made by alpha NT's, who are not good at analyzing people but inanimate objects, came up with those.They are stereotypes. Gamma in particular is the most misunderstood quadra (understandable as well since it's the opposite quadra of the alpha NT's who write those descriptions). I noticed this bias very soon when I came to Socionics. Wonder why other people don't notice. I guess some gammas probably notice it too, but they don't say anything it seems
    I mean you are entitled to your own opinion like everyone else but if you can't understand that people here place much more importance on a person that has analyzed personality types for decades compared to you who has never published anything significant and seems to completely rely on your intuition for typings, I dunno, you need to question yourself a little bit. most people here learn the theory in a casual way, and many just want to follow the person that is considered the absolute expert in the field and not a nobody that may or may not be right or gifted. Almost everyone here thinks they have the true insights into all of this but very few people actually make the effort of publishing articles about their thoughts. for now you are just a random person that occasionally gets a type right.
    the majority of people who browse this site are IEI. intuition of time is the function that is interested in the psychological state of human beings. typology is a field dominated by INxx, especially IEI.

  18. #6258
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    TIM
    LIE-Ni
    Posts
    1,280
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    I mean you are entitled to your own opinion like everyone else but if you can't understand that people here place much more importance on a person that has analyzed personality types for decades compared to you who has never published anything significant and seems to completely rely on your intuition for typings, I dunno, you need to question yourself a little bit. most people here learn the theory in a casual way, and many just want to follow the person that is considered the absolute expert in the field and not a nobody that may or may not be right or gifted. Almost everyone here thinks they have the true insights into all of this but very few people actually make the effort of publishing articles about their thoughts. for now you are just a random person that occasionally gets a type right.
    You're starting to grate on me. It is irrelevant if a person has supposed expertise, if what they are asserting is incorrect. This just shows how easily swayed by popular opinion, con men, titles, and supposed "expertise" you are. The truth is independent from who asserts it, it stands on its own. That you are unable to discern it, and have to rely on the opinion of these "experts", is your problem. But I have good news(I guess); a lot of people are just like you.

  19. #6259

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    2,906
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lavos View Post
    You're starting to grate on me. It is irrelevant if a person has supposed expertise, if what they are asserting isincorrect. This just shows how easily swayed by popular opinion, con men, titles, and supposed "expertise" you are. The truth is independent from who asserts it, it stands on its own. That you are unable to discern it, and have to rely on the opinion of these "experts", is your problem. But I have good news(I guess); a lot of people are just like you.
    what truth are you even talking about? oh I know, it's your truth. "if only all these sheep could see what I can see". you treat your own opinion as the end all be all, only you can see through all the things. get a grip, man. why don't you go to a scientifc community and tell them about all the revelations you have? socionics will be accepted in no time. you are truly an all-knowing deity, or maybe just another Ni dom that thinks his fantasy is reality.
    the majority of people who browse this site are IEI. intuition of time is the function that is interested in the psychological state of human beings. typology is a field dominated by INxx, especially IEI.

  20. #6260
    H.H.W
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Posts
    1,020
    Mentioned
    56 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    maybe just another Ni dom that thinks his fantasy is reality
    Don't you think you're like that ?

  21. #6261
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    TIM
    LIE-Ni
    Posts
    1,280
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    what truth are you even talking about? oh I know, it's your truth. "if only all these sheep could see what I can see". you treat your own opinion as the end all be all, only you can see through all the things. get a grip, man. why don't you go to a scientifc community and tell them about all the revelations you have? socionics will be accepted in no time. you are truly an all-knowing deity, or maybe just another Ni dom that thinks his fantasy is reality.
    I don't pretend for anything I assert, for people to take it at face value. I want to believe (perhaps incorrectly) that people are intelligent enough to verify things. Or at least I want to make it so. And you're one to talk; who types half of the forum IEI. For sure, you're one to talk about "delusions"...

    There are a lot of stupid people in positions of influence. That doesn't make it right or should be accepted. Wake up dude. You don't know anything.

  22. #6262

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    2,906
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Missmessy View Post
    Don't you think you're like that ?
    you know, the same with you. I wish you were more humble. how long have you been studying socionics now? maybe half a year? and already you see yourself as an expert that needs to constantly criticize me even though I have you on ignore on chat and here because I can't read the nonsense you write. you switch your type like you switch your clothes. it is clear that you don't understand the theory, but you keep debating as if you are an expert. and yes, I get annoyed by that over time.
    the majority of people who browse this site are IEI. intuition of time is the function that is interested in the psychological state of human beings. typology is a field dominated by INxx, especially IEI.

  23. #6263

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    2,906
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lavos View Post
    I don't pretend for anything I assert, for people to take it at face value. Wake up dude. You don't know anything.
    Quote Originally Posted by lavos View Post
    You're starting to grate on me. It is irrelevant if a person has supposed expertise, if what they are asserting is incorrect. The truth is independent from who asserts it, it stands on its own. That you are unable to discern it, and have to rely on the opinion of these "experts", is your problem.
    you literally are implying that Gulenko is wrong and that you are the person who knows the truth. don't pretend like it's otherwise.
    the majority of people who browse this site are IEI. intuition of time is the function that is interested in the psychological state of human beings. typology is a field dominated by INxx, especially IEI.

  24. #6264
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    TIM
    LIE-Ni
    Posts
    1,280
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    you literally are implying that Gulenko is wrong and that you are the person who knows the truth. don't pretend like it's otherwise.
    Can't Gulenko be wrong about something? Or the fact that he is "Gulenko" automatically makes everything he states correct, in a foolproof manner?

  25. #6265

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    2,906
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lavos View Post
    Can't Gulenko be wrong about something? Or the fact that he is "Gulenko" automatically makes everything he states correct, in a foolproof manner?
    I am not saying he can't be wrong. I even disagree if you have noticed with my IEI typings. the things that is annoying about you is that you just claim "well, I know the truth, and people who follow him are sheep for trusting him", yet you have yet to post any sophisticated explanation for your thoughts, outside of "I use this very obscure model by some random person with weird plus/minus signs and that's the right one.
    the majority of people who browse this site are IEI. intuition of time is the function that is interested in the psychological state of human beings. typology is a field dominated by INxx, especially IEI.

  26. #6266
    WinnieW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    TIM
    alpha NT
    Posts
    1,675
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lavos View Post
    VI is true, alpha NT's might not like it much because they do not value +Ni/-Ne (pattern recognition, underlying/hidden phenomena).
    Interessting. Wouldn't that mean that in consequence of that only gamma NT and delta NF types are able to use VI in a reliable way to type other people?

    Ok, I posted an image of myself here.
    Maybe you can use VI to tell what type I am.

  27. #6267

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    2,906
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WinnieW View Post
    Ok, I posted an image of myself here.
    Maybe you can use VI to tell what type I am.
    you look ethical
    the majority of people who browse this site are IEI. intuition of time is the function that is interested in the psychological state of human beings. typology is a field dominated by INxx, especially IEI.

  28. #6268
    WinnieW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    TIM
    alpha NT
    Posts
    1,675
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Missmessy View Post
    Germans are generally more disciplined , more strict and serious than other peoples...
    Maybe not if you're a member of the alpha quadra. Oops... that applies to me as well.

  29. #6269
    H.H.W
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Posts
    1,020
    Mentioned
    56 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    you know, the same with you. I wish you were more humble. how long have you been studying socionics now? maybe half a year? and already you see yourself as an expert that needs to constantly criticize me even though I have you on ignore on chat and here because I can't read the nonsense you write. you switch your type like you switch your clothes. it is clear that you don't understand the theory, but you keep debating as if you are an expert. and yes, I get annoyed by that over time.
    After reading your response and remembering how many times you said you are an expert , I remembered the common phrase:

    The person who knows a lot about something won't call himself as expert because he knows how much responsibility he has , only the person who knows little will call himself an expert

    And btw , I haven't ever called myself an " expert " and I won't ever , not because I know a lot of things, but because I don't have plans to master socionics and I'm here for different reasons that are not of your business

    It seems like you don't know what does the word " Forum " means

    Here's a good definition, please read it many times until you realise what does it mean, instead of complaining about how much annoying are I , Coeruleum Blue and other members who criticize you because of your useless method of typing


  30. #6270
    Self-proclaimed typing expert Poptart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Posts
    2,477
    Mentioned
    173 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Warning: Pot Stirring

    Idk why everyone gets mad at alive for over-typing IEI when Gulenko has the same problem (instead with beta rationals) ツ

    Literally this forum:
    Attached Images Attached Images

  31. #6271
    WinnieW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    TIM
    alpha NT
    Posts
    1,675
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    you look ethical
    Ok, if this is the case, I'll accept it. But then my type is neither LII nor ILE.

  32. #6272

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    2,906
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Missmessy View Post
    And btw , I haven't ever called myself an " expert " and I won't ever , not because I know a lot of things, but because I don't have plans to master socionics and I'm here for different reasons that are not of your business

    It seems like you don't know what does the word " Forum " means

    Here's a good definition, please read it many times until you realise what does it mean, instead of complaining about how much annoying are I , Coeruleum Blue and other members who criticize you because of your useless method of typing
    how many types have you considered for yourself yet? SLE, ESI, LSI, maybe others I have missed? how long do you think it will take till you have had all 15 types? but it can't be IEI, Alive can't be right, it's the "absolute worst typing"
    the majority of people who browse this site are IEI. intuition of time is the function that is interested in the psychological state of human beings. typology is a field dominated by INxx, especially IEI.

  33. #6273

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    2,906
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poptart View Post
    Idk why everyone gets mad at alive for over-typing IEI when Gulenko has the same problem (instead with beta rationals) ツ
    Gulenko simply says Beta is the quadra that is interested in socionics, while I go even further and say only one type finds this theory very interesting. I do not know why people think sensing types or Te valuing types care for this theory. I think it's ridiculous to assume every type is equally interested in an obscure theory like this. socionics would have long been mainstream if that were the case
    the majority of people who browse this site are IEI. intuition of time is the function that is interested in the psychological state of human beings. typology is a field dominated by INxx, especially IEI.

  34. #6274
    H.H.W
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Posts
    1,020
    Mentioned
    56 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    you switch your type like you switch your clothes. it is clear that you don't understand the theory
    Changing my type :

    1- is not of your business

    2- doesn't take away my right to discuss with you (since we are in a public forum)

    and even Socionics real experts mistyped themselves, some of them you typed them completely different from their self-typing , does this mean that they do not have the right to deal with Socionics ?

  35. #6275
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    TIM
    LIE-Ni
    Posts
    1,280
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WinnieW View Post
    Interessting. Wouldn't that mean that in consequence of that only gamma NT and delta NF types are able to use VI in a reliable way to type other people?

    Ok, I posted an image of myself here.
    Maybe you can use VI to tell what type I am.
    The image is a bit of poor quality for VI purposes, but I'd guess ILE-Ti. Those will be the most capable potentially, but actually anyone who has ability with that IM will have capability. I actually think it is more -Ne than +Ni, but both can be used. My ILE-Ne uncle has good VI capability based on some things I've heard him say, and he gets it through Ignoring position. The ignoring in accepting types is somewhat proficient and contains both +/- elements. In producing types, it only contains one (but gives the impression of using it more frequently, and has a higher tolerance for it--but not actual ability).

  36. #6276

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    2,906
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Missmessy View Post
    Changing my type :

    1- is not of your business
    it indicates irrationality
    the majority of people who browse this site are IEI. intuition of time is the function that is interested in the psychological state of human beings. typology is a field dominated by INxx, especially IEI.

  37. #6277
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    TIM
    LIE-Ni
    Posts
    1,280
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    Gulenko simply says Beta is the quadra that is interested in socionics, while I go even further and say only one type finds this theory very interesting. I do not know why people think sensing types or Te valuing types care for this theory. I think it's ridiculous to assume every type is equally interested in an obscure theory like this. socionics would have long been mainstream if that were the case
    Have you thought any other possibility, like for example, just that beta types are over-represented in society? Don't see any logical reason why they ought to be more interested in Socionics than the rest.

  38. #6278
    H.H.W
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Posts
    1,020
    Mentioned
    56 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    how many types have you considered for yourself yet? SLE, ESI, LSI, maybe others I have missed? how long do you think it will take till you have had all 15 types? but it can't be IEI, Alive can't be right, it's the "absolute worst typing"
    After reading more in Socionics and do my video questionnaire only Beta ST and LII

    I used to change my type a lot when I thought I'm an ethical type because no ethical type really suited me

    ESI was the only ethical type which suited me somehow but after reading about similarities between Fi and Sx instinct , and after analysing the way I dealt with Fi the whole of my life I excluded it

    SLE and ILI are excluded too , I'm for sure no type other than LXI : Ti ego , Fi role and Fe suggestive describes me well ( though it took me time to realise that since I'm not that person who cares about his personality that much )

    And to be honest, it's almost settled in favor of the LSI, but I prefer to wait a bit before considering it completely

    Now , if you have a good reason to type me IEI ( away from Ni+ and art that I explained why they're false in the Alive list of IEI thread ) then I won't mind you give them
    If you don't, it's better to not make yourself a joke in the forum more than that

  39. #6279
    Self-proclaimed typing expert Poptart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Posts
    2,477
    Mentioned
    173 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    Gulenko simply says Beta is the quadra that is interested in socionics, while I go even further and say only one type finds this theory very interesting. I do not know why people think sensing types or Te valuing types care for this theory. I think it's ridiculous to assume every type is equally interested in an obscure theory like this. socionics would have long been mainstream if that were the case
    No one here is assuming that the types are uniformly interested in socionics.

    Different types can approach the same topic for different reasons.

    If you can’t imagine why a Te-valuing type would care about socionics, then I suggest learning more about those types. Maybe get to know some Te peeps irl.

  40. #6280
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    TIM
    LIE-Ni
    Posts
    1,280
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    For the record: Missmessy has really good Te, so I doubt she is IEI. The fact she wavers with her self-typing, can perhaps be attributed to youth, and low +Ne/-Ni (perhaps even PoLR).

    +Ne/-Ni is the element responsible for asserting what something "is" or "isn't".

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •