Your typing of forum members

[Robert Dane Horlock]

I don't often pay attention to dates. If something is old, I assume it could just as well be a slow moving thread. I don't really see time as super relevant when it comes to a forum format. Maybe I'm wrong about that, though.

Alright, fair enough. I usually just estimate dates, I don't track time wildly. But yeah, time doesn't matter as long as you're not gonna necro 17 year old threads lol.

[myresearch]

Take a look at Gulenko subtype again, I realize that some type may get a higher change with some subtype and vice versa:

Exp: SLE introvert subtype would be easier to have N subtype more than H subtype: with N subtype, they already have 3D Si, 3D Ti and 1D Fi, when with H sub, they only have 3D Si, 1D Fi and 1D Ni.

ILI is a very introvert type, even with an extrover sube, they still less extrovert than other type

Exp: ILI - D would focus on 3D Te, 1D Fe and 1D Se, and with ILI - C: 3D Ne, 1D Se, 1D Fe
While with ESI D: 3D Fe, 3D Se, 1D Te. ESI C: 3D Se, 3D Fe and 1D Ne.

ESI more extrovert than ILI.

Interesting take. Since G hasn't declared too much info about how enhanced functions affect other IEs, I am not sure how it plays out in the eyes of him.

But based on seeing same type, same sub type people, I think they don't focus on all enhanced functions of an archetype.

So I think even DC subs can be inert sub in terms of two sub model and HN can be more extrovert, it depends on enhanced IEs.

[Ocean Man]

What type is @Stray Cat? He's kind of a pussy, I can't see Beta ST for him at the moment.

[Robert Dane Horlock]

What type is @Stray Cat? He's kind of a pussy, I can't see Beta ST for him at the moment.

Probably a Delta Extrovert, if not ILE.

[Ocean Man]

My typings so far using Model G from just interfacing with people randomly when I'm bored etc.

@Stray Cat LSI
@Robert Dane Horlock Most likely Beta ST
@Lady Leviathan EIE-C
@Rusal EIE-H
@EIE H EIE-H or EIE-N
@one Most likely Beta NF

There are some others too.

[Ocean Man]

If you get more info, curious which NF and which subtype

If you make a muted video with just your eyes moving while talking (cropped), I can try typing from that for fun.

[Ocean Man]

My typings so far using Model G from just interfacing with people randomly when I'm bored etc.

@Stray Cat LSI
@Robert Dane Horlock Most likely Beta ST
@Lady Leviathan EIE-C
@Rusal EIE-H
@EIE H EIE-H or EIE-N
@one Most likely Beta NF

There are some others too.

@Adam Strange LIE or ILE in Model G, never seen a video of him
@Armitage LSI in denial
@cyberpunk SLE - needs some Ni in his life
@Tallmo SEI-N most likely
@godslave EIE

[Ocean Man]

@Adam Strange LIE or ILE in Model G, never seen a video of him
@Armitage LSI in denial
@cyberpunk SLE - needs some Ni in his life
@Tallmo SEI-N most likely
@godslave EIE

@AWellArmedCat EIE-H, gaslit by @Alive into thinking he's an IEI
@roger557 LSI, a really weird boomer LSI with some kind of fixation on fecal matter - literally asks people how they take a shit
@Subteigh Possibly IEI, good sense of humor
@Disturbed LSI-H

[Miss Maverick]

I've never been able to see One as ILI. Seems more like an Ethical type, even (very high Agreeableness, partly), and Fe valuing. Doesn't seem Gamma, either.

[Miss Maverick]

Regarding the EIE typing for me, considering me to be any kind of Fe valuing type is rather silly. It's clear I care nothing about maintaining, or even being considerate/mindful of, emotional atmospheres. I have awareness of them, but I literally ignore them. One pays far more attention to them than I do, even.

[Ocean Man]

Regarding the EIE typing for me, considering me to be any kind of Fe valuing type is rather silly. It's clear I care nothing about maintaining, or even being considerate/mindful of, emotional atmospheres. I have awareness of them, but I literally ignore them. One pays far more attention to them than I do, even.

Last I checked you were a pretty creative expressive person, I never typed you EIE out of malice or to troll you - an Ne PoLR doesn't work for you since you don't have one. You are also a Dynamic type, you write about things as being in motion, suffer from boredom (i.e. being a person of time, not space) etc. That's all I really have to say about it. Pretty obvious to me you aren't LSI or ESI. Look into IEI if EIE doesn't fit, also a Dynamic type.

And yeah, @one is also Beta NF.

[Leo]

@Adam Strange LIE or ILE in Model G, never seen a video of him
@Armitage LSI in denial
@cyberpunk SLE - needs some Ni in his life
@Tallmo SEI-N most likely
@godslave EIE

Thanks. Yes, I do need Ni, though I'm not sure how it looks.

[Ocean Man]

Which Beta NF

Originally I thought IEI-C. But maybe EIE-H, you seem to be Process over Results and actively want more data.

[Miss Maverick]

Last I checked you were a pretty creative expressive person, I never typed you EIE out of malice or to troll you - an Ne PoLR doesn't work for you since you don't have one. You are also a Dynamic type, you write about things as being in motion, suffer from boredom (i.e. being a person of time, not space) etc. That's all I really have to say about it. Pretty obvious to me you aren't LSI or ESI. Look into IEI if EIE doesn't fit, also a Dynamic type.

And yeah, @one is also Beta NF.

If you knew me you would not be saying that, lol my Ni is absolute 1D shit. I'm also results > process, serious > merry, democratic > aristocratic (very strongly, aristocracy would go against my own values), negativist > positivist but I try to be balanced, constructivist > emotivist, decisive > judicious, have very little tolerance/patience for theory/abstract and prefer concrete/practical/factual........points such as "gets bored" don't really hold any weight in comparison to these kinds of things. IDK, tbh I'm kind of an ESI meme, but I don't care what people type me as. What I care about is the way I'm treated (whether that be when I'm being typed or otherwise).

EDIT:
Yeah, I'm not new to Socionics. Already "looked into" several types and ruled out IEI, which was one I did consider before. I trashed it because I could not relate to the Ni, Fe, etc, lol.

EDIT II:
No idea why you think I'm dynamic > static, but I'm definitely not. That is actually something that causes problems in my life at times, and I've talked about that in some of my posts before.

Well, at the end of the day, you don't know me at all, and no one knows me better than I know myself.

[Ocean Man]

If you knew me you would not be saying that, lol my Ni is absolute 1D shit. I'm also results > process, serious > merry, democratic > aristocratic (very strongly, aristocracy would go against my own values), negativist > positivist but I try to be balanced, constructivist > emotivist, decisive > judicious, have very little tolerance/patience for theory/abstract and prefer concrete/practical/factual........points such as "gets bored" don't really hold any weight in comparison to these kinds of things. IDK, tbh I'm kind of an ESI meme, but I don't care what people type me as. What I care about is the way I'm treated (whether that be when I'm being typed or otherwise).

EDIT:
Yeah, I'm not new to Socionics. Already "looked into" several types and ruled out IEI, which was one I did consider before. I trashed it because I could not relate to the Ni, Fe, etc, lol.

EDIT II:
No idea why you think I'm dynamic > static, but I'm definitely not. That is actually something that causes problems in my life at times, and I've talked about that in some of my posts before.

Well, at the end of the day, you don't know me at all, and no one knows me better than I know myself.

You're not gonna like this, but I'm pretty sure I know a Supervision ITR. With that said, I also know you aren't my Activator, or my Dual. If you're ESI, I'd be pretty surprised since I've only met one in my entire life and she liked me more than her own son.

All I can do for you is suggest you just get typed by Gulenko. Good luck with this whole typology deal.

[Miss Maverick]

You're not gonna like this, but I'm pretty sure I know a Supervision ITR. With that said, I also know you aren't my Activator, or my Dual. If you're ESI, I'd be pretty surprised since I've only met one in my entire life and she liked me more than her own son.

All I can do for you is suggest you just get typed by Gulenko. Good luck with this whole typology deal.

Typing via ITR is a ridiculous method. Especially when this entire thing is theoretical and ITRs might not even exist in reality. If you prioritized information well, you would also not see ITR typing as more dependable than other aspects of the typology system.

EDIT:
You've got person A and then B, and you're assuming the type of B based on whatever you type person A as. So...not only are you assuming someone's type based on another's alleged type, but you're also then assuming how that ITR would act, plus assuming they will interact with every single (Dual/Supervisor/Etc) in the same manner as opposed to being on an individual case by case basis. Why in the hell would you do that while ignoring things like dichotomies and Information Metabolism Elements as they pertain directly to the individual? Makes 0 sense. All you're doing is postulating many things when you go that route.

[Ocean Man]

Typing via ITR is a ridiculous method. Especially when this entire thing is theoretical and ITRs might not even exist in reality.

Already experienced them, they exist. Again, you aren't my Activator or my Dual. This is why Gulenko uses his Control Te and charges $ for responses when it comes to people like yourself.

Now please stop talking to me, you are super annoying. If you want someone that is Activated by your Fe and thinks you're awesome go talk to @cyberpunk he already said he thinks you're hot in his post-history.

[Miss Maverick]

Already experienced them, they exist. Again, you aren't my Activator or my Dual. This is why Gulenko uses his Control Te and charges $ for responses when it comes to people like yourself.

Now please stop talking to me, you are super annoying. If you want someone that is Activated by your Fe and thinks you're awesome go talk to @cyberpunk he already said he thinks you're hot in his post-history.

You've got person A and then B, and you're assuming the type of B based on whatever you type person A as. So...not only are you assuming someone's type based on another's alleged type, but you're also then assuming how that ITR would act, plus assuming they will interact with every single (Dual/Supervisor/Etc) in the same manner as opposed to being on an individual case by case basis. Why in the hell would you do that while ignoring things like dichotomies and Information Metabolism Elements as they pertain directly to the individual? Makes 0 sense. All you're doing is postulating many things when you go that route.

In other words, your logic is retarded and you suck at typing people.

Nice try, but I've never shared a picture of myself.

[Ocean Man]

SUPERVISION INTENSIFIES

Again, you're not my Activator.

[Miss Maverick]

Again, you're not my Activator.

It's cute how in denial of being wrong you are. In a pity kind of way, really.

If you don't want to talk to me, don't initiate a conversation next time, mr oh so logical supervisor of mine.

[Ocean Man]

It's cute how in denial of being wrong you are. In a pity kind of way, really.

If you don't want to talk to me, don't initiate a conversation next time, mr oh so logical supervisor of mine.

Uh huh. Do you know how Supervision works? You're the Supervisor because Fe Base supervises Fe PoLR/Brake and also drains the Supervisee (me) of energy.

I'm going to be the one blocking you this time, because while you accuse other people of being narcissists, it's actually you that is. Plot twist.

[VewyScawwyNawcissist]

@Lady Leviathan

i confused ur avatar for this pony from afar

[VewyScawwyNawcissist]

@Xelor WHATS MY TYPE

[Ocean Man]

@Xelor WHATS MY TYPE

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierson%27s_Puppeteers one of these, I guess.

[Miss Maverick]

@Lady Leviathan

i confused ur avatar for this pony from afar

lmao
fwendship is magic!!!

if I was in a better mood I'd come up with something funny but I'm not

[Ocean Man]

Lol can you guys just stop bickering and VI this: @Xelor @Lady Leviathan and others?

Intuitive Eye expression, but no directional movements - so kinda useless.

[Adam Strange]

Pretty sure: Introvert.

Less sure: low Se.

Possibly, but maybe not: xxxp.

[Robert Dane Horlock]

@Xelor - Yeah, in G's System (not model A), I would have probably pinned myself as an LSI or SLE.

[Emily]

@kittendioxide is IEI

[Miss Maverick]

Lol can you guys just stop bickering and VI this: @Xelor @Lady Leviathan and others?

ILI-Fe

[AWellArmedCat]

@AWellArmedCat EIE-H, gaslit by @Alive into thinking he's an IEI
@roger557 LSI, a really weird boomer LSI with some kind of fixation on fecal matter - literally asks people how they take a shit
@Subteigh Possibly IEI, good sense of humor
@Disturbed LSI-H

Lol I've thought I was IEI since way before joining this forum, it's not because of @Alive that I didn't change my stated TIM. I still am seriously considering your opinion that I'm EIE-H, and may yet come around to that view at some point. My thoughts generally need awhile to percolate before I'm ready to make a decision one way or another.

As always I appreciate any comments on my type. Thanks for including the DCNH you believe me to be as well

[Miss Maverick]

Xelor = Ti PoLR

[Ocean Man]

@decqueen IEI over EIE
@one EIE over IEI
@ariesangel EIE-C

[Ocean Man]

Is there any recent info that made you sway that way

There's a saying that comes to mind about how magicians aren't supposed to reveal their tricks.

[Manatroid92]

There's a saying that comes to mind about how magicians aren't supposed to reveal their tricks.

True, but you never get to appreciate how clever a magician’s tricks actually are if they’re never revealed.

[Ocean Man]

True, but you never get to appreciate how clever a magician’s tricks actually are if they’re never revealed.

@Manatroid92 I think you're EIE-H

My brain just kind of naturally understands Socionics with very little effort, other systems require more time.

[Manatroid92]

@Manatroid92 I think you're EIE-H

My brain just kind of naturally understands Socionics with very little effort, other systems require more time.

Interesting, though I’m a bit skeptical. The temperament doesn’t really fit me, I’m very certain I’m an introvert, and I feel I’d maybe be closer to Pe than Je. Though I’m certainly Fe-valuing (and pretty sure I am intuitive).

I have a Type Me thread if you want VI evidence, or anything else to use as fuel for speculation:
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...re-Manatroid92

[Emily]

@decqueen IEI over EIE
@one EIE over IEI
@ariesangel EIE-C

Although it's still a possible probability , I would like like to know why
Especially that I'm thinking about IEE again

[Tallmo]

So do you mean that LSI would have clear Se, LII clear Ne, EIE clear Fe, etc?

LII-C will also have clear Se. It's independent of type, it doesn't contradict Se polr. Meaning they can be mobile and interact with the environment more than other subtypes.

[Tallmo]

@Tallmo SEI-N most likely

yes, That's right, SEI with N sub. I've been N for my whole life, although it has somewhat changed over the years, I'm not as identified with it as I maybe used to be. And I used to have the most intimate relationships with D subs, but I find it's getting harder and harder to deal with Ds. It's possible that my subtype is not fully developed because of lack of direction in work etc. It would be really interesting to hear G:s opinion on my subtype and possible accentuations.